Updated 03:46 pm.EST, Mon November 23, 2009

Society|Fri, Aug. 21 2009 12:13 PM EDT

S.D. Doctors Must Tell Women Abortion Ends a Human Life

By Nathan Black|Christian Post Reporter

Women seeking an abortion must be told that the procedure ends a human life, a federal judge ruled Thursday, upholding part of a South Dakota law.

U.S. District Judge Karen Schreier said doctors must disclose to pregnant women that "the abortion will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being."

But she rejected other portions of the state's 2005 informed consent law that required doctors to tell women that abortion increases the risk of suicide and that they have "an existing relationship with that unborn human being."

"A legal relationship requires two people. The United States Constitution does not recognize an unborn embryo or fetus as a 'person,' in the legal sense," Schreier stated.

Assistant Attorney General John Guhin praised the ruling, commenting, "I think the most important part of the statute has been upheld."

Leslee Unruh, founder of the Alpha Center pregnancy counseling center in Sioux Falls, plans to appeal the judge's decisions on the suicide and relationship disclosures but still sees the overall ruling as a major step for the pro-life cause.

"This is the unraveling of Roe [v. Wade]," Unruh told The Associated Press. "We take the human being part and go to the Supreme Court and put the human relationship in. That knocks out Roe v. Wade."

Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota filed a lawsuit against the state in 2005, alleging that the language in the law was "ideologically charged" and unconstitutional.

The informed consent law was blocked by Schreier from going into effect until the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit lifted the preliminary injunction in July 2008.

Planned Parenthood called Schreier's latest decision a "major victory" despite the judge's decision to uphold the "human being" portion of the law.

Just weeks before this week's ruling, the state Department of Health sent Planned Parenthood a notice warning that South Dakota's only abortion clinic could lose its license and be shut down. Health officials said the wording of the clinic's disclosure form must match the language required by the informed consent law.

Sarah Stoesz, CEO of Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, said the clinic will submit a plan Monday on how the clinic intends to comply with the 2005 law.

Meanwhile, the Department of Health will review the judge's decision and implement it, Guhin said.

"We've taken the view, at least with regard to the human being disclosure, that since the 8th Circuit ruled they've been obligated to comply, which is over a year ago," he said, according to AP.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:37 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    "The 14th amendment clearly states that only those "BORN or naturalized" in the United States are entitled to equal protection under the law. Fetuses are not born. Fetuses are sure as heck not naturalized."

    If you saw your child moving around in its mothers womb you sure won't be claling it a fetus....

  • Mon Aug 24, 2009 9:40 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. show No? What? hide

  • Sun Aug 23, 2009 7:18 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    So, homoo, is your real name Tom, or Bert? Maybe William Huggins?

  • Sun Aug 23, 2009 6:18 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. show So which one is it? Does a fetus qualify as being 'born,' or do they administer naturalization tests in utero now? hide

  • Sat Aug 22, 2009 10:30 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Not sure everyone has seen this post, and we want all brothers to have a chance to consider it before we turn the page. So we're gonna post this a couple more times where different brothers are speaking on fresh topics before we move on. We trust we have your approval. -------------------------------------------------------------- When you're involved in some place, it sometimes isn't as apparent to you as it should be how much the environment has gradually decayed. (This is how the western world has decayed since the 1970's, without most people noticing just how bad.) Christian newcomers arrive to the place you've been in for some time, and they are shocked how unchristian this place is and wonder what you are doing here. We are told to not be a part of the world, but not to take ourselves out of the world. We are to let our light shine. With unbelievers, I believe God has clear instructions on how true Christians are to handle them and their questions. With those who are argumentative about what we preach, we are to give them a couple of warnings, Then if they persist in their perverted arguments, we are to turn away from such ones. If we don't, we grieve and risk losing God's Holy Spirit which guides us. If we continuously disobey God in this matter, we certainly and needlessly place ourselves in a spiritually dangerous position. Is that God's Word or not? I ask you brothers these three questions, However solid you think you are in your faith, are you putting your spirituality in danger by continuously engaging with someone who is repeatedly arguing with your scriptural teaching and is obviously a Hater of God and His Good Teachings? Are there any scriptures that clearly tell us what God's Word is regarding what we are counselled to do by God when dealing with unbelievers who oppose God's Word we are sharing with them and repeatedly argue against us over the same issues? Are there any scriptures that clearly tell us the danger we are putting ourselves in by not following God's Will when dealing with unrepentant and rebellious unbelievers? Brothers, let us consider these questions for a moment and let God's Holy Spirit guide us to a solution that finds us obedient to God's Good Counsel. TGF The most loving thing you can do for your family is to pull them out of the public school system and keep them far away from apostate churches. hide

  • Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:46 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    It's always wonderful to see the will of the people upheld by our court system.

  • Sat Aug 22, 2009 8:57 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Predict it won't stand on appeal hide

  • Fri Aug 21, 2009 7:13 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    "This is the unraveling of Roe [v. Wade]," Unruh told The Associated Press. "We take the human being part and go to the Supreme Court and put the human relationship in. That knocks out Roe v. Wade."

    Praise God! We may just be winning this fight for our country, brothers and sisters! Keep up the good work! Hallelujah!

  • Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:56 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 2

    Once again H316 has it wrong. If you look at the debate surrounding the 14th amendment, you'll see that its applying to illegal immigrants. Protection by US laws only applies to people born in the USA or to naturalized citizens. It has nothing to do with fetuses!

  • Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:56 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 2

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Way to go Homo! You tell 'em! Matter of fact I think infanticide should be made mandatory for everyone. The world is entirely too overpopulated! We should do what China does and abort all the little girls. Now THAT would be the "final solution"! All great secular nations have adopted infanticide and genocide! Why not us? Why NOT us??? Of course China has developed another small problem. All the males can't find women to marry. Buuuuuuttt no matter. The Communists are well ahead of the curve, helping to lower the "carbon footprint" of future generations. Oh wait, what future generations? hide

  • Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:50 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 3

    Flagged as inappropriate. show "Fetuses are not born. Fetuses are sure as heck not naturalized." That's because they are sucked out of the womb and killed before they have a chance to be born. hide

  • Fri Aug 21, 2009 4:31 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 6

    Flagged as inappropriate. show The 14th amendment clearly states that only those "BORN or naturalized" in the United States are entitled to equal protection under the law. Fetuses are not born. Fetuses are sure as heck not naturalized. hide

  • Fri Aug 21, 2009 3:02 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 2

    S.D. Doctors Must Tell Women Abortion Ends a Human Life

    Nuh uh! HUMAN???

    Who knew?

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a