Updated 09:38 pm.EST, Fri November 20, 2009

Opinion|Fri, Oct. 23 2009 09:22 PM EDT

Feminism Unfulfilled

By R. Albert Mohler, Jr.|Christian Post Guest Columnist

"The woman's movement wasn't about happiness." That judgment, attributed to feminist Susan Faludi, seems to be the blunt assessment shared by many other women. As numerous recent studies now indicate, a remarkably large percentage of women describe themselves as increasingly unhappy.

This issue came to light last month in a fascinating essay by Maureen Dowd of The New York Times. Dowd, whose columns often reveal the nation's Zeitgeist, cited the fact that a number of major studies indicate that "women are getting gloomier and men are getting happier." She asked: "Did the feminist revolution end up benefiting men more than women?"

A very similar set of questions arises from TIME magazine's current cover story and special report, "The State of the American Woman." As the cover of the magazine explains, "A new poll shows why they are more powerful - but less happy."

Reporter Nancy Gibbs traces the vast changes brought about by the feminist revolution. "It's funny how things change slowly, until the day we realize they've changed completely," she observes. As she documents, these changes are easily visible in contemporary America:

In 1972 only 7% of students playing high school sports were girls; now the number is six times as high. The female dropout rate has fallen in half. College campuses used to be almost 60-40 male; now the ratio has reversed, and close to half of law and medical degrees go to women, up from fewer than 10% in 1970. Half the Ivy League presidents are women, and two of the three network anchors soon will be; three of the four most recent Secretaries of State have been women.

Along the way, Gibbs also traces more fundamental changes. With remarkable understatement she simply notes "the detachment of marriage and motherhood" among other transformations. "Women no longer view matrimony as a necessary station on the road to financial security or parenthood," she explains.

Nevertheless, "Among the most confounding changes of all is the evidence, tracked by numerous surveys, that as women have gained more freedom, more education and more economic power, they have become less happy."

Gibbs cites a growing body of research that documents this trend toward unhappiness. In "The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness," [pdf file] published in the American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, economists Betsey Stevenson and Justin Wolfers explain that women in the 1970s "reported higher subjective well-being than did men." Now, the opposite is the case.

The big question raised by these studies is this: Has feminism produced unhappiness among women? That question is inescapable when seen in light of the historical context. The great transformation of society by feminism took shape only after the 1970s. As a political and social movement, feminism has been stunningly successful. In the span of a single generation, the society has been overwhelmingly transformed. But, over the same period, women report themselves less happy, especially as compared to men.

As Gail Collins notes in her new book, When Everything Changed: The Amazing Journey of American Women from 1960 to the Present, the pace of this transformation has been absolutely stunning. "The cherished convictions about women and what they could do were smashed in the lifetime of many of the women living today," she observes. "It happened so fast that the revolution seemed to be over before either side could really find its way to the barricades." Continue »

Pages: 12
Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Tue Oct 27, 2009 10:45 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    ..i see your points sisters...almost everyone who marry don't have a godly idea of their proper roles in marriage. GOd seldom has anything to do with their marriages so the results are very disappointing. In other words people in their wrteched sinful sate try to be good but can not endure over the long haul in their own strengths when they are tried and tested.....Pain and sufering are intended to wake us up to see hat something is terribly wrong within ourselves. THey are intended to lead us to turn to GOd and acknowledge His Lordship. THey are intended to bring us to CHRIST our Savior.

    Everyone, i suppose , who ever lived ,desired success and victory in their lives. They sought meaning and significance in their existence. ANd the only way they can find that purpose is in the Creator Himself...who afterall is the Supreme Righteous Judge of all peolple and the Rewarder of all who diligently seek Him.


    The Biblical Position on Women's Roles
    -------------------------------------------------------------
    John Macarthur
    http://www.biblebb.com/files/MAC/womensroles.htm

    --good read, by the way
    God bless!

  • Mon Oct 26, 2009 6:06 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Well said, Tamara! I've known guys who refused to ever change their baby's diaper.. and it's a shame. I have a weak stomach and it took me over 3 years to get used to those diapers but I still did it - and my husband willingly helped when he was home. We should be actively help each other.. now some things my husband is better suited for than me. I like to say he "fixes it and I make it look pretty." It's one thing to refuse a job because of a gender related thing, it's another to actually not have that skill.. but you can use your gifts to help each other. The same way, at a job it shouldn't matter man or woman as far as salary goes. Some jobs pay more because of what it is, who does it shouldn't make the difference as long as they're qualified for it.

  • Sun Oct 25, 2009 7:34 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    Feminism is much more practical than that for most of us. For those of us who work, we have seen our salaries come closer to men's, and that makes me happier. And the problem isn't feminism. It's men - men who think that they can't do "women's work" - like change a diaper, get up with a baby, fix a meal or wash a dish. It will take more than one generation to end the slavery men have forced upon their wives in the name of Christianity. Personally, I prefer to strive towards being the woman in Proverbs whose business dealings made her husband proud rather than being the sahm the Donna Reed's of this world told us we should be. That's not Christianity.

  • Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:03 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 3

    booboo....great and GOd bless you :O)


    P.S. I noticed there is someone who continiously thumb me down whereever i post..God bless you,too,by causing you to see the error of your ways..i forgive you, just so you know :O)

  • Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:56 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Jehovahnissi - "Booboo" is the name of one of my cats.. which I got from the 70s/early 80s show Laverne & Shirley (Booboo Kitty). Glad you like it. Thx for the welcome and I will check on that site you mentioned..

  • Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:21 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 4

    ...God is grieved when people,specially women and chilren, are abused by those who are responsible to take care of them...

    ...I am reminded of the story of Hagar, a woman slave, who was used and abused. In her lonely plight GOd met her at her deepest need and she called Him--



    El Roi - God Who Sees
    ==========================================



    Where do you run to when you feel mistreated and alone?
    Where can you find comfort? Does anyone see your need?

    The Name of the LORD is a Strong Tower --
    The righteous run into it and are safe. (Pr 18:10)



    For a deeper study this link will truly bless you:
    http://www.preceptaustin.org/el_roi_-_god_who_sees.htm

  • Sun Oct 25, 2009 12:12 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Thank you also, booboo. FYI, i use that name for my granddaughters...it is a name of endearment to me...

    welcome, by the way, to CP.

  • Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:56 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Thank you, Jehovahnissi. I hope you didn't think I was trashing you, I honestly didn't understand. But what you said made a lot of sense.

    lpepperw, it's sad that feminism misses a lot as far as other women go. How women are treated on tv, how Muslim women are treated, the list goes on. I homeschool and we just read about the Yanomamo, that little girls are being bought as wives, using even a dog as payment to the family! My two daughters and I prayed for these little girls this past week. So much is left out and it's sad. But I guess that's where missionaries come in.

  • Sat Oct 24, 2009 5:02 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 5

    Booboo,

    I agree with you regarding true biblical submission. Not until one is regenerated or born again from GOd can this attitude be understood and applied in life.

    Since the fall we ceased to see ourselves as a creature of God but rather as autonomous beings separate from God.

    The two , man and woman, struggle for control, and as a result, neither lives for the best interest of the other - the very nature of sin itself.

    Ephesians 5:21 talk about how this can be remedied, however. To be "subject to one another out of reverence for Christ." Only when both people are working for the good of the other can a relationship once again thrive and be closer to what was originally intended by God.


    I like Matthew Henry's commentary on this:

    ...Observe here how mercy is mixed with wrath in this sentence. The woman shall have sorrow, but it shall be in bringing forth children, and the sorrow shall be forgotten for joy that a child is born, Jn. 16:21. She shall be subject, but it shall be to her own husband that loves her, not to a stranger, or an enemy: the sentence was not a curse, to bring her to ruin, but a chastisement, to bring her to repentance. It was well that enmity was not put between the man and the woman, as there was between the serpent and the woman.


    Gen 3:16 -Matthew Henry

  • Sat Oct 24, 2009 3:14 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    The Women's Rights movement was never intended to be like pro-abortion. It was about allowing women to vote, equal pay, things like that.
    Feminists see things like submission to be the same as like slavery, or allowing a man to abuse her. But that's not true submission. The Bible says for the husband to love his wife and treat her as Christ treats us; He gave His life for us. The man is to treat his wife as lovingly. Jesus spoke to women at a time when it was not acceptable for a Rabbi to speak directly to a woman, but rather he spoke to her husband about what she wanted to say or ask him.
    Jehovahnissi, forgive me but I don't understand what you mean about a woman to be in a "state of sorrow." Do you mean we're to be sorrowful all the time? Or are you just saying about the pain in childbirth?
    We're all sinners, we're all under the curse, both men and women. The difference is as Christians, we serve the Lord and someday all the horrible things of this world will pass away and we won't have to deal with any kinda sorrow or pain anymore.

  • Sat Oct 24, 2009 2:44 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 5

    The thing about American Feminists that has surprised me,
    is the lack of care and concern for oppressed women in Muslim
    Countries.

  • Sat Oct 24, 2009 1:52 am Agree: 4   Disagree: 5

    GEN 3:16
    =====================
    John MacArthur

    **The Curse on the Woman--Part 1
    http://www.biblebb.com/files/mac/gen316curse.htm

    **The Curse on the Woman--Part 2
    http://www.biblebb.com/files/mac/gen316curse2.htm

  • Sat Oct 24, 2009 1:23 am Agree: 4   Disagree: 5

    "..It is equally tenuous to maintain that the phrase "and he shall rule over you" was given because Eve had usurped the authority and leadership role of Adam when she took and ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. The sin of the first woman was not that she took the lead without seeking the prior counsel of Adam. No such prior consultation was needed, for she herself knew God's commandment prohibiting them from eating the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (2:17). The woman's sin was that she exalted herself above her Creator. She took it upon herself to determine, together with the counsel of the serpent, if God's law was good or bad, if it was right or wrong. Her sin had nothing to do with denying Adam his rightful role of leadership in their marriage or with grasping a role that belonged to her husband. The only role that Eve usurped was that of God's, a usurpation that is characteristic of all acts of sin of all people living in all times of the history of mankind.
    Woman may desire to dominate or rule over man, but it is not a part of the punishment pronounced upon woman; it is just the essence, character, and result of all sin against God. Self-exaltation and pride always result in the desire to dominate and rule. Every person to some
    extent desires to dominate and rule over others--not just woman over man."


    WOMAN'S DESIRE FOR MAN: GENESIS 3:16 RECONSIDERED
    -----------------------------------------------------
    Copyright © 1986 by Grace Theological Seminary; cited with permission.


    faculty.gordon.edu/.../Articles-Books/Busenitz-Gen3-GTJ.pdf

  • Sat Oct 24, 2009 1:14 am Agree: 4   Disagree: 5

    Gen 3:16
    ===============


    Unto the woman He said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire [shall be] to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.


    ---------------------------------------------------------


    We have here the sentence passed upon the woman for her sin. Two things she is condemned to: a state of sorrow, and a state of subjection, proper punishments of a sin in which she had gratified her pleasure and her pride.

    ...Observe here how mercy is mixed with wrath in this sentence. The woman shall have sorrow, but it shall be in bringing forth children, and the sorrow shall be forgotten for joy that a child is born, Jn. 16:21. She shall be subject, but it shall be to her own husband that loves her, not to a stranger, or an enemy: the sentence was not a curse, to bring her to ruin, but a chastisement, to bring her to repentance. It was well that enmity was not put between the man and the woman, as there was between the serpent and the woman.


    Gen 3:16 -Matthew Henry

    --------------------------------------------------------

    This passage is a judgment oracle. It announces that conflict between man and woman will become the norm in human society. It does not depict the NT ideal, where the husband sacrificially loves his wife, as Christ loved the church, and where the wife recognizes the husband’s loving leadership in the family and voluntarily submits to it. Sin produces a conflict or power struggle between the man and the woman, but in Christ man and woman call a truce and live harmoniously (Eph 5:18-32).

    Net Bible
    --------------------------------------------------------

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Gifts
  • Health
  • DVD
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links