Here's a little factoid:

Originally the term "catholic" (lower case "c") defined the early church as "universal." So to be called a catholic Christian was acknowledging your part in the entire body of the church, spanning time and place alike. It wasn't until the institution of the Roman Catholic Church (upper case "C"), over four centuries later, that the term began to refer to catholicism. Given our heritage (and not Roman Catholic), we are all catholic Christians, belonging to the universal church body of Christ. - God Bless

I agree, the whole ideal of all these denominational church just divides the body of Christ. The best way is just to go back to the scriptures. God gave us the Word so that we can read and understand it for ourselves. Why do we need a bunch of people interpreting the Word of God for us, when it is right there for us to interpret ourselves. I guess that's why early Christianity started off with house Churches. But in the 4th Century when these Big Churches developed and got into political power they made house churches illegal. As the matter of fact, Rome tried to make the translation of the bible into a secular language illegal in the 14th Century. Then even during the times of the reformation, Luther and Calvin, discouraged house churches. These were all ways for a group of "elites" to force their interpretations on the rest of us. I say what we need is more non-denomination, more house fellowships, more small groups, and more bible study groups.

:). I love America... Theres always something new and exciting happening in this country, we're always making history. We are in a historical moment folks. What do you think is going to happen?

Very good point Dan, I didn't think of doctrinal differences. Sadly, they do have that which is why I probably diverted from a specific denomination. I guess what I was trying to say is that we should quit writing doctrine and rely on scripture. I'd like us all to do what the bible says rather than relying on traditions or someone else's interpretations.

I understand your sentiments Shuck. There should be greater unity among Christians. However, in the example you cite from First Corinthians, it can be assumed there were no significant doctrinal differences between Paul, Peter and Apollos. There can be some fairly significant doctrinal differences between those calling themselves Baptists, Methodists, Pentecostals, etc. Knowing the name of the church allows you some insight into their beliefs. Labels shouldn't separate us, but labels help me know what's inside the can.

I guess I'd be categorized as one of the "changes in affiliation" Christians having switched from Baptist to non-denominational. I don't see how this is a bad thing though. We should never call ourselves Baptists or Methodists or any other demonination. We should always be of the Christian denomination.

1 Corinthians 10-13
I appeal to you, dear brothers and sisters, by the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ, to live in harmony with each other. Let there be no divisions in the church. Rather, be of one mind, united in thought and purpose. 11 For some members of Chloe’s household have told me about your quarrels, my dear brothers and sisters. 12 Some of you are saying, “I am a follower of Paul.” Others are saying, “I follow Apollos,” or “I follow Peter,” or “I follow only Christ.” 13 Has Christ been divided into factions? Was I, Paul, crucified for you? Were any of you baptized in the name of Paul? Of course not!

I am one of those 2 out of 3 Jehovah's Witnesses that left the WatchTower Cult, as have all but two members of our 5 JW generation family.

If interested in discovering the "real Jehovah's Witnesses" as revealed by the American Judicial System:


SUMMARIES OF NEARLY 1000 JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES LAWSUITS & COURT CASES

The following website summarizes 500 U.S. court cases and lawsuits affecting children of Jehovah's Witness Parents, including 350 cases where the JW Parents refused to consent to life-saving blood transfusions for their dying children:

DIVORCE, BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS, AND OTHER LEGAL ISSUES AFFECTING CHILDREN OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES

http://jwdivorces.bravehost.com


The following website summarizes nearly 500 lawsuits filed by Jehovah's Witnesses against their Employers, including JWs hurt on the job and who refused blood transfusions, etc.

EMPLOYMENT ISSUES UNIQUE TO JEHOVAH'S WITNESS EMPLOYEES

http://jwemployees.bravehost.com