Today's Christian News Online - The Christian Post
Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. (JN 8:32)
Jun 16,2009, 11:37AM

"And if there's life on other planets..." Reflections on God and E.T.

Is it possible that there is intelligent life out among the stars? And if there is, what would be the theological implications of this fact? Many Christians have assumed that there could not be intelligent extraterrestrials, and that if some were discovered then this would somehow constitute a challenge to the Christian faith.

But that apparently wasn't the view of Larry Norman, the father of Christian rock. Norman always sang about interesting, relevant and unusual topics. In his classic song "UFO" (off the album In Another Land) he likens the returning Christ to an "unidentified flying object". In keeping with this cosmic theme, Larry then sings: "And if there's life on other planets, then I'm sure that he must know. And he's been there once already, and has died to save their souls."

Is Larry correct? Could there be intelligent aliens out there? And if there are, are they fallen like us? (Or, are they fallen because of us?) Were they made in the image of God? Do they too need a savior?

These are some of the questions raised in the fledgling discipline known as exotheology. While I will attend to some of these interesting questions in subsequent posts, here I will focus on another issue: the extent to which the search for intelligent extraterrestrial life often serves a quasi-religious role for the "scientifically" minded.

Aliens have long carried a quasi-religious fascination for the general public. For instance, Spielberg's classic film E.T. has some of the most striking christological parallels in all of cinema: so striking in fact that one could almost consider the film an allegory of the Christ story. Consider that E.T. comes from the heavens to bring healing to a broken family. He performs miracles, including bringing things that have died back to life. In a Garden of Gethsemane scene, he goes out into the woods the night before he is taken prisoner and "phones home". Then he is taken into captivity, dies, is resurrected, and ascends back to the heavens in a space ship.

While the religious allusions that pervade E.T. may simply be part of the rich texturing of storytelling in a premiere family film, the fact is that many people imbue aliens with quasi-religious status. And we need not think only of those devotees of crop circles and alien abductions. Even many hardened scientists who would blanch at the idea of God as non-scientific become positively mystical when contemplating intelligent life from unknown worlds.

Consider how many scientists speak of E.T.s as having potentially godlike attributes. Physicist Paul Davies has speculated that "super-advanced aliens would appear [to us] as gods." Indeed, Michio Kaku has speculated that a super-technological alien society could have even created our universe!

If aliens could have created the world, many scientists hope they could also fix the world. Carl Sagan, who for years spearheaded the "search for extra-terrestrial intelligence", was known to be driven in part by a hope that contact with aliens could bring to us new discoveries that could greatly alleviate the suffering of our world (a form of salvation). Thus he wrote of first contact:

"To me, such a discovery would be thrilling. It would change everything. We would be hearing from other beings, independently evolved over millions of years, viewing the Universe perhaps very differently, probably much smarter, certainly not human."

I agree that first contact with alien life would truly be extraordinary. But would such a discovery deal with the existential crisis? Could it constitute our salvation? Such speculations remind me of the famous quip by G.K. Chesterton: "When man stops believing in God, he will believe in anything at all."

"And if there's life on other planets..." Reflections on God and E.T.
Is it possible that there is intelligent life out among the stars? And if there is, what would be the theological implications of this fact? Many Christians have assumed that there could not be intelligent extraterrestrials, and that if some were discovered then this would somehow constitute a challenge to the Christian faith.
Most recent comments
1.June 28,2009, 12:47AM
A very interesting discussion. One point I believe that is overlooked is that if there is alien life, there is a 99.99% probability that it is far more advanced than our own. We are only 100 years removed from a "primitive", non-technological society that was barely above the stone age. The univers is 13.7 billion years old. If we allow 5 billion years for stars to form the elements needed for life, we still have 8 billion years for intelligent life to develop in the heavens. We are just starting our search for truth and God in the heavens, and reality. Science is telling us that "reality" is an illusive concept according to quantum mechanics. If there are aliens out there, most likely they have advanced to the point of knowing most of the "truths" we are seeking now, and probably would not need evangelizing. Another interesting idea that I encountered in an astronomy course many years ago is that if there is intelligent life in the heavens, it must be very similar to us because there is a reason we have two eyes, for perspective, a nose positioned just above the mouth to detect bad food, walking upright, and other characteristics. When the lecturer finished, the class was convinced that any intelligent life must necessarily look exactly like us. I don't buy the "exactly" part but I believe there is some truth to the premise.
--aepling
2.June 23,2009, 10:59PM
RD,

Some may say it would count against Christianity but since Scripture is silent on the matter, it would be a hollow and uninformed opinion, nothing more. Scripture says that man is the apex of His creation, not the center of the universe. Not all believed that because man is the apex of creation that the universe rotated around the Earth (just look at Dante).

Evangelism could be a more important priority to some with aliens as you say sir. Of course, that would be dependent upon if we needed evangelizing from the aliens or the other way around.....

Grace and Peace,
Jim
--oldstudent
3.June 20,2009, 10:59AM
Jim,

You ask "Why would discovery of alien life (maybe more intelligent compared to humans, maybe far less intelligent compared to humans) count against Christianity?"

If it would count against Christianity, then it would do so in the same way that the shift from a ptolematic to a copernican universe did. In the ptolemaic view the earth was the center and we were the undisputed apple of God's eye. But with the copernican shift, the sun was the center, and now of course we realize we are in the suburbs of a very average galaxy, one of over a hundred billion similar galaxies. To discover life elsewhere in the universe would merely continue the process of "deprivileging" human beings, and thereby to marginalize their religious opinions.

But if a person does not believe that the shift to our present understanding of the universe counts against Christianity (my view, and I assume yours as well), then presumably the discovery of aliens will not present any special challenge either. Rather, it would provide a new opportunity for evangelism!
--RD Rauser
4.June 19,2009, 5:13PM
Why would discovery of alien life (maybe more intelligent compared to humans, maybe far less intelligent compared to humans) count against Christianity? This question has always been puzzling. If there is life elsewhere in the universe, that makes intelligent design even more probable and begs the question, "where did the other life forms come from?" As far as science allows, we see the universe expanding which means at one point, it was not there. That includes any life off this beautiful ball of dirt.

Grace and Peace,
Jim
--oldstudent
5.June 17,2009, 11:21AM
Steve,

I agree that the Drake equation produces a highly inflated number of civilizations in our galaxy. (And I share your fascination with Europa. When I first read about the moons of our solar system -- Europa, Ganymede, Io -- I thought it must be science fiction!)

But what disturbs me about the whole "Drake debate" is the assumption of many Christians that granting the possibility of some (or many) intelligent alien civilizations counts against Christianity. To my mind, that is like somebody in the fifteenth century reasoning that Columbus could not have found a new continent because that would count against Christianity.
--RD Rauser
6.June 17,2009, 10:51AM
mathetes,

Excellent point. Contingency, complexity and specification drive SETI research. And what if when the Phoenix Mars Lander touched down a year ago, it had encountered 150 rocks in the dusty red soil which spelled out "Welcome to Mars"? Rational design inferences are all around us.
--RD Rauser
7.June 17,2009, 10:48AM
Hello RD

First of all, thank you for your comments.

I think I would agree with you regarding Sagans,Drakes etc.. views regarding other civilizations (should they exist beyond this solar system). Whether they do is another matter, when I take a good look at Drakes equation I'm okay with the first three parameters but after that it really is all guess work, I don't think its looks very promising. I feel this even more, especially if one understands that for a large period of time life on this planet was very simple with complexity being a relatively new kid on the block, so to speak. Then there are many other things to factor in when complexity arises, from the composition of the atmosphere to the positions of the continents as they traverse the globe, and thats just for starters. This planet is a very special place. That said I would like to take a look at the oceans of Europa, most likely nothing there, but just curious...

Hi mathetes, how you?

BW

Steve

Hi mathetes
--steveh20
8.June 17,2009, 12:13AM
RD, I also see a connection between the SETI hope for alien life and one of your previous blogs. SETI listens hoping to catch a signal that is specific, non-repeating, and information-bearing, something along the lines of a sequence of prime numbers. They reason such information could only come from an intelligent source.

But when scientists look at a single cell and see the information packed into its DNA, they deny that the DNA information is the result of intelligence and say it is the result of chance, even though it meets the very criteria used by SETI to scan the cosmos. How can the criteria work in one case but not the other?
--mathetes
9.June 16,2009, 11:56PM
steveh20,

Fair question. My first answer is that a Chesterton quote is its own reward. Fortunately however, there is a deeper point as well.

Sagan repudiated traditional notions of God (though in some writings, including the novel "Contact", he appears to take a deistic position). And as a result, his search for extraterrestrial intelligence assumed the status of a quasi-religious quest. In his writing Sagan made clear his hope that contact with aliens could actually lead to human beings solving many of our problems including war, poverty, et cetera.

As a result, while Sagan repudiated traditional belief in God, he had an extraordinary faith in the existence, benevolence and competence of alien life. Indeed, his faith is in certain respects not far of that of Whitley Strieber (in his bestselling account of alien contact "Communion") and other new age devotees of aliens. That in my view is a sadly misplaced faith.
--RD Rauser
10.June 16,2009, 11:18PM
I'm sorry and I'm embarressed as I know its me, but what does the quote from GK have to do with the above article?
Thanks
--steveh20
11.June 16,2009, 5:19PM
mathetes,

I agree with you. "Contact" is a great film (based on Carl Sagan's novel of the same name), and it adeptly explores the faith/reason/science debate. Though Jodi Foster could not provide evidence for her encounter with the alien to the critics, she was nonetheless justified in her belief that she did have such an encounter. And that does parallel the Christian's basic justification in her experience of God.
--RD Rauser
12.June 16,2009, 5:12PM
One of my favorite movies on the topic is Contact. Jodi Foster's character is a scientist who scoffs at faith and believes in only what can be measured and tested. Then she has an unexplainable experience that seems to fly in the face of the facts, and cannot understand why people won't believe her. I think that is what many of us go through when we come to experience God and then seek to tell others about Him.
--mathetes
Comment on this Story
Don't have a christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click here
Copyright © The Christian Post. All right reserved.About Us|Contact Us|Media Kit|Registration|Terms and Conditions|Disclaimer|Corrections