Why Some Evangelicals Won't Vote for Romney

BillDolack »

Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:56 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

Seeking Zoe:

There is a major difference between John Kennedy and Mitt Romney. Kennedy was a nominal Catholic who obviously did not live by the ideals of his church (re: adulterous relationships). Romney, on the other hand, is a Temple Mormon and high priest. He is NOT a nominal Mormon.

Why Some Evangelicals Won't Vote for Romney

BillDolack »

Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:55 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 5

Bill Keller is absolutely right. Christians who support Romney have a hand in leading people to hell. As president, Romney would achieve legitimacy for his cult, thus opening it up to many seekers.

If you want a candidate who's pro-life and evangelical, support Mike Huckabee.

Conservatives, Evangelicals Urged to 'Galvanize' Support Around Romney

BillDolack »

Tue Oct 16, 2007 1:40 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

Quote: “I am convinced his values practically mirror my own—values about the sanctity of life, the sacredness of marriage, the importance of the family, character and integrity, free enterprise and smaller government,” he writes.

Sadly, it appears Mr. DeMoss has been duped by the Romney machine.


Quote: He also notes that the next president will have to deal with issues including same-sex “marriage” and abortion. “Do we want that person to be Hillary Clinton, Rudy Giuliani or Mitt Romney?”

How about "none of the above"?


Quote: “While I wholeheartedly agree with Dr. James Dobson that not having a pro-life nominee of either major party presents an unacceptable predicament, I would rather work hard to ensure we do nominate a pro-life candidate than to launch an 11th-hour third party campaign,” he writes.

Then coalesce around Mike Huckabee, an evangelical CHRISTIAN who shares our vales AND can beat HRC.