Episcopal Gay Bishop, Partner Joined in Civil Union

JackCP23 »

Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:05 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

I couldn't agree more with John 14-6. The Episcopal Church is apostate. Look at what has happened to them: first, they got rid of the "Comfortable Words" from the Liturgy. They are still found in Rite I, but few churches even bother with Rite I anymore. For those non-Episcopalians, the Comfortable Words are four passages of Scripture that presents the Gospel in a simple, straight-forward, and unmistakable way. Next, they ordained women as priests. Horrible. And now, of course, the last stage of their apostasy, homosexuals. I left the Church and am thankful I did. After struggling with whether to wait it out to see if there would be a split or not, I finally decided to leave and have never felt better.

Pro-Gay Booklet's 'Facts' Draw Criticism

JackCP23 »

Wed Feb 27, 2008 10:02 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

Can chicago24 really be that ignorant? Here's some advice for him: if you're going to criticize Christians and their views, at least have the decency to accurately understand their views. For one thing, the Bible categorically condemns homosexuality. That is the plain, unmitigated teaching the Holy Scriptures.

The Muddle-Headed Archbishop

JackCP23 »

Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:50 am Agree: 4   Disagree: 1

Another hard-hitting, good piece by Ken Connor. Rowan Williams is indeed "Muddle-Headed " and, beyond that, a disgrace to the Church at large. Because of his weak, milk-toast response to the homosexual crisis in the Communion, the gay agenda now threatens to split that Communion. All this on his watch. He should be ashamed of himself.

New Fla. Standards Use Word 'Evolution'

JackCP23 »

Wed Feb 20, 2008 5:03 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

In response to danny: I'm sorry I wasn't more clear in my comment. What I mean is simply this: Darwinism doesn't seem to deal with the fundamental question of where all the "stuff" of the universe comes from.

Where did the comet(s) come from that supposedly started the process of life? Where did all the building blocks of life come from?

This, in my opinion, is the biggest weakness of Darwinism. The Darwinist won't address this question. He'll only say that nobody knows.

But that leaves him with the two choices of my previous comment.

New Fla. Standards Use Word 'Evolution'

JackCP23 »

Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:43 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

The fundamental flaw with the theory of evolution is its avoidance of The Question: i.e., where did life come from? How did life originate?

The Darwinist will piously say that the theory of evolution doesn’t really concern itself with this. He might say that the building blocks of life were in the universe and then one day a bolt of lightening struck (or something along those lines) and the elements got together and one thing led to another and here we are.

But that begs the question. Where did the elements come from? Where did the lightning bolt come from? Where did the “stuff” that makes up life come from?

As a Darwinist, you either must believe (a) that the universe and the elements therein are eternal or (b) something came out of nothing.

Both (a) and (b) are logically absurd.

I much rather believe in a Creator.

Laity Supports Leaving 'Episcopal Titanic'

JackCP23 »

Mon Feb 11, 2008 3:51 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

SportinLife doesn't think TEC is not in crisis?? The Episcopal Church in the US has for years been irrelevant, but now it is headed for disaster.