Vermont Moves Closer to Legalizing Gay Marriage

John Marcus Doe »

Sun Feb 08, 2009 5:36 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

My response to Swanay~Rah:
I should have explained what I meant. It appears, from reading all the comments, that the basis for perceiving homosexuality as a "sin" is the bible. Apparently, there is a passage about two guys named Sodom and Gommorah who tried to rape angels, and that God burned down their village in anger. Firstly, I do not see where the word homosexuality is mentioned in the bible. Secondly, the bible is the "2000 year old novel" I was referring to. And apparently, people back then were dumb enough to believe a story about an attempted rape on winged people(angels). In addition, the whole "flat earth..." jibberish was to indicate that people back then truly had a lack of insight and attempted to attribute anything they could not understand as an act of a supernatural force. Of course, now that seems absurd, but back then, it may have been believable. So, what is amusing is that the basis for rejecting marriage b/n people of the same sex is a book(the bible) written 2000 years ago by clueless people with severe lack of understanding about nature, and that 2000 years later(when obviously people have a better understanding of the world) people think the old standards still apply.

Vermont Moves Closer to Legalizing Gay Marriage

John Marcus Doe »

Sun Feb 08, 2009 1:58 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

This is just hilarious. We're in the 21st century, and we're referring to a fictitious novel written 2000 years ago. Are you serious? 2000 years ago, people could hardly begin to imagine the advances humanity has made since then. 2000 years ago, people thought the world was flat! And yet, it is amusing how people now believe that there is something impressive in a 2000 year old novel written by people with a diminished perspective about the world.

Moral Majority Co-Founder Dies at 66

John Marcus Doe »

Sat Jan 03, 2009 4:05 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

Good Riddance!

Religulous: The Foolish of the World

John Marcus Doe »

Fri Oct 24, 2008 11:42 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

Ok, now think about it logically. If I was on the fence about being religious, why would I want to believe in supernatural being/beings who demand that I give up my free will for some non-existent afterlife? And by the way, why are these supernatural beings so hard to see? I mean, why the mystery? Oh, and enough with the "we're being tested" b.s. So far, I have not seen any gods or any angels, or for that matter, anyone who can prove that they have interacted with such beings. So, why should I give up my free will?

Federal Marriage Amendment Re-introduced in Senate

John Marcus Doe »

Fri Aug 08, 2008 1:37 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

This article is pretty funny. Especially the quote by Tom McClusky. First of all, how are heterosexual marriages going to be affected because of a law that allows gay marriages to be valid? Are heterosexual couples all of a sudden going to think, "hey we can be gay, let's be gay, YAY." That is just dumb. Secondly, how is a child best served by a father and a mother? Unless of course, Tom is implying that a father contributes differently to the growth of a child than a mother. Which, again, does not make sense because the only main difference between a man and a woman is their genitalia. So, unless there's something special a child will learn from his father's balls or his mother's ovaries, I don't see how a child raised under a same sex family will be different from a child raised "the normal way."

Opponents Forsee Massachusetts as 'Las Vegas of Gay Marriage'

John Marcus Doe »

Fri Aug 08, 2008 1:23 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

See, this is what I don't get? Why do people care if other people, homosexual or heterosexual, get married? It is none of their business.
In addition, how on earth would children become gay just because there are same sex marriages?

Battle Over Teaching 'Weaknesses' of Evolution Moves to Texas

John Marcus Doe »

Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:53 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

"Evolution is not fact. Evolution is a theory and, as such, cannot be proven," That is the worst BS I have ever heard. In science, and not in day to day language, a theory is a hypothesis that has wide range of acceptance as a result of the breadth of evidence and prroof. For example, The Electromagnetic throry and Maxell's Equation... However immense the evidence for a hypothesis might be, science forbids it from being a dogma, and thus it will still be considered a theory. So advice to the Vice-Chairman, careful on the word choice.

Maine Group Drops Push to Repeal Gay Rights Law

John Marcus Doe »

Sat Jun 21, 2008 1:41 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

Religon has no place in a world driven by common sense and logic. Worse of all, trying to deny a certain portion of the population its basic rights is simply an atrocity. C'mon, this is the 21st century not 1200 AD. Religon has no credebility in assessing matters such as gay rights.

Exposing the Darwinian Paradox

John Marcus Doe »

Sun May 25, 2008 1:18 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

B.S. Evolution is a lie? You have got to be kidding. Religon is the worst lie of all. Let's all believe that there are unrealistic things floating among us. Let's blame all bad things on a horned creature that supposedly lives beneath the earth. Have you read the bible? Well I have. And for years I have years I have been fooled by its fairytales. Now that I think about it, it;s probably the most sexist, racist, biased, dull literary work there is. And all of those say evolution is a lie, it helps to do a little reading.

Pastor Says Parting with McCain Best for Both

John Marcus Doe »

Sun May 25, 2008 1:06 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 11

Pastor Hagee is the greatest man in the universe. He is so great, I think he is more divine than Jesus himself. Pastor Hagee is not a rich fat cat. No. Pastor Hagee is not a deceptive, arrogant, viper. No. He is a saint.You know what, during the rapture (which we all eagerly await, ah yes, the best of times) , I bet god will award Hagee and a gold medal as well as $1000000 for his political involvement. Yep, nothing like religon and politics. In fact, they should reinstate theocracy. If you don't believe, you'll be burned. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

SF Mayor Ecstatic Over Gay Marriage Ruling

John Marcus Doe »

Sun May 25, 2008 12:56 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

Excommunication? people actually believe in that? If so, I claim the power of excommunication. Yes, I shall be known as the Great Excommunicator. My days of glory will be told and retold as I march across the land excommunicating people and pastors and others for political reasons. If I don't like what they say, I shall excommunicate. If they don't like the kind of chocolate that I like, I shall excommunicate. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha .

Exposing the Darwinian Paradox

John Marcus Doe »

Thu May 22, 2008 3:07 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

I just saw the movie. It sucked. A lot. Not only was its bias clearly vivid, Ben Stein's assertions are substanitally lacking and ridiculous.

Overturning California's Gay 'Marriage' Ban

John Marcus Doe »

Thu May 22, 2008 3:01 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 3

You know what? It's quite ridiculous that people are wholeheartedly believing a 2000 year old novel. As a matter of fact, my grandma, who can't even speak english, can write better folklores and fairytales. Now, a bunch of religous nutjobs are denying certain portion of the populace civil rights as a result of a stupid novel written by a tone-deaf arrogant

Exposing the Darwinian Paradox

John Marcus Doe »

Tue May 20, 2008 11:58 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

I do not believe in "God" since no supernatural being exists. It's simply the creation of people's: a remnant of the old days of ignorance. Even if God was to exists, I would not choose to believe in such a tyrannical and hypocritical despot who approaches with the guise of forgivness but would damn his children to eternal agony.

Obama Wins Support of Major Pro-Abortion Group

John Marcus Doe »

Mon May 19, 2008 11:00 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 3

pro-choice rules. Your serously lack common sense. Where is God? I don't see him. Do you? I believe in the flying spaghetti monster.

Christians Launch Campaign against Global Warming Hype

John Marcus Doe »

Sat May 17, 2008 8:12 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 12

"'How can you create policies on uncertain science?' asked Dr. Barrett Duke." What is he a doctor of, stupidity? if he was willing to look, there is plethora of evidence. Some examples; polar ice caps melting, sea levels rising, CFC and CO2 emissions rising, global tempratures rising... You know what's even more hilarious. they rely on the bible as evidence; a book that has no supporting evidence except for the folk-tales and fairy tale stories written in it.

Christians in Politics: Too Much or Too Little?

John Marcus Doe »

Sat May 17, 2008 7:49 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

You know, republicans and the right are the worst hypocrites of all. They seem to advocate Original Intent. Do you have any idea of what original intent means? Do you have any idea what Thomas Jefferson wrote? "Separation of state and church." What the on earth do you want, a theocracy? yeah, i bet you'd like that.

Small Town Conservatives: Bitter or Better?

John Marcus Doe »

Mon Apr 28, 2008 3:08 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 3

Mr. Conner, good job on intentionally misinterpreting a misstatement to imply something that was not even intended by Obama, and to possibly mislead people into harboring negative beliefs about the candidate.

Equating Animals with Humans

John Marcus Doe »

Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:22 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

Oh are you serious. What a load of b.s? First you proclaim that animals are created by "God" and now you are stating that they have no soul? Please, this is the 21st century if you have not noticed. People are not dumb as you think they are. And would you please stop foolishly bashing Evolutionary science with out even reading a single bit about. Trust me, I have read the Bible several times, and I rather not comment about it. So many people would be christians right now, if only it never contradicted itself over and over and over and over and over again

Darwinism: The Imperialism of Biology?

John Marcus Doe »

Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:01 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

Clearly, Mr. Stein has no clue what Evolutionary theory is. First of all Darwin never connected his theory to imperialsim. Instead, his cousin and the dumb Herber Spence coined the term "social Darwinism" to rationalize the superiority of the upper class. Second, who on earth said that the big and buff are the fittest? in fact, this is far from the truth. Survival of the Fittest means, the survival of the species that can successully adapt to its enviroment.
Let me also make something clear. There is a reason why Evolutionary Theory is called a theory. It's because it is not intended to be a dogma, like religon. See, scientists are not as foolish and gullible as you think they are. Only extremely rigorous experimentation can promote a theory to a scientific law, such as Newton's laws of mechanics.
Lastly, Mr. Stein has the clear deficiency of differentiating among Marxist and Lenninist communism. Marx never intended for a dicatorial communism. His only problem was that he gave humanity more credit than it deserved. Of course, then came Lenin and established the dictatorial communist style of leadership.
One more thing. Have you noticed that those who actively promoted religon for the past 1600 years are the wealthy and rich to the nose? Let me tell you something. The upper-class will do what ever it can to sustain its supremacy. And religon has been the tool to do that.