Good and cautious speakers and writers use some word very carefully to avoid being taken as an extremist or get caught in a generality that prooves false. Case in point is the word “ALL”, meaning 100% of something. Wise people would say “most” or “many”. But Jesus can say “ALL” and be sure of His footing. So when Jesus said ALL sin is based on a lack of love He was sure of h...more

Good and cautious speakers and writers use some word very carefully to avoid being taken as an extremist or get caught in a generality that prooves false. Case in point is
the word “ALL”, meaning 100% of something. Wise people would say “most” or “many”. But Jesus can say “ALL” and be sure of His footing. So when Jesus said ALL sin is based on a lack of love He was sure of himself. In Mt 22:39 He is recorded as laying down the law by defining sin as lack of love. As people created in the image of the God of Love, we are expected to live up to that image. Unloving acts are not godly acts. That said, who in a homosexual relationship violates Jesus’ law and definition of sin (Mt. 22:35-40)? Where is the lack of love, who is being hurt, and who could bring suit? Don’t feel bad if you don’t have an answer. The homophobes don’t either.less

Jesus still Jesus still defines sin as lack of love (Matthew 22:36-40). Fornication and adultery are unloving because each has a victim. What is unloving about a couple in a homosexual love relationships ? Neither is victim, neither is unloved. Where is the hurt? Who is the victim being sinned against?

Note that Jesus still defines sin as lack of love (Matthew 22:36-40). Fornication and adultery are unloving because each has a victim. What is unloving about a couple in a homosexual love relationships? Neither is victim, neither is unloved. Where is the hurt? Who is the victim being sinned against? No Gospel writer nor prophet covers homosexuality because it is not a sin issue. The King James...more

Note that Jesus still defines sin as lack of love (Matthew 22:36-40). Fornication and adultery are unloving because each has a victim. What is unloving about a couple in a homosexual love relationships? Neither is victim, neither is unloved. Where is the hurt? Who is the victim being sinned against? No Gospel writer nor prophet covers homosexuality because it is not a sin issue. The King James Version comes closest to a correct English translation of two condemning nouns used in Leviticus 18:22 against homosexuals. It translates as "sexual immorality", not necessarily homosexual. (Remember that "homosexual" was coined about 1865, so any translation using a form of that word is a lie that needs to be ammended. In 1946 it premiered in an English Bible.) If God didn't want men (or women?) to have sex with other men, He would have said "Man shall not lie with man PERIOD That whole "...as with a woman" thing condemns straight men pretending to make it with a woman.less

Note that Jesus still defines sin as lack of love (Matthew 22:36-40). Fornication and adultery are unloving because each has a victim. What is unloving about a couple in a homosexual love relationships? Neither is victim, neither is unloved. Where is the hurt? Who is the victim being sinned against? No Gospel writer nor prophet covers homosexuality because it is not the issue. The King James V...more

Note that Jesus still defines sin as lack of love (Matthew 22:36-40). Fornication and adultery are unloving because each has a victim. What is unloving about a couple in a homosexual love relationships? Neither is victim, neither is unloved. Where is the hurt? Who is the victim being sinned against? No Gospel writer nor prophet covers homosexuality because it is not the issue. The King James Version comes closest to a correct English translation with "sexual immorality" which is not homosexuality. (Remember that "homosexual" was coined about 1865, so any translation using a form of that word is a lie that needs to be amended.) If God didn't want men (or women?) to have sex with other men, He would have said "Man shall not lie with man PERIOD That whole "...as with a woman" thing condemns straight men pretending to make it with a woman.less