I can't believe that gd is blatant about his bigotry. He thinks that gay relationships are moral, and condemns Christians for thinking it's immoral.....and then calls other relationships immoral.

gd "You are woefully incorrect, but you don't care, do you? You think polygamy and incestuous marriages are the morally same as same-sex marriages..." I can't believe you said something that dumb.

Lutern, I see that no one has given scripture to support homosexuality. I'm not suprised.

"Why are so many right-wing Christians SO obsessed with homosexuality? The answer is so obvious, it need not be said." I know. Because they are trying to keep gay marriages from becoming legal.

gd "Do you understand the reasoning behind why it is illegal? It has nothing to do with equal rights." Well, considering that marriage is a contract, having nothing to do with children. I'd say it has nothing more to do with legality than homosexual marriages.

So, here is the problem. Jcrp first advocates for equal rights. And then immediately rescinds that by saying he doesn't advocate for equal rights. Which is it?

So by jrcp's admission he support the rights of siblings and parent/offspring to get married. And polygamy.

gd "I thought we explained why incest and polygamy are illegal, Prophet. Do you need it again?" No. I understand that the government isn't for equal rights. You made that clear.

Flagged as inappropriate. show

So you support the rights of siblings and parent/offspring to get married. And polygamy. Interesting. hide

I hope you're not holding your breath waiting for an answer...lol.

She certainly does have a good p-p-p-p-p-poker face.

hu6, true there are three types of sexuality. But only hetero is acceptable to God.

What hostility, hu6? Not that you have the manhood to answer, but at least I tried.

The "no true scotsman"' fallacy? Or the "no true scotsman" fallacy fallacy?

"Google the "no true scotsman logical fallacy"." Oh geez. Not the ol' "no true scotsman fallacy" fallacy.

believer said in response to gd "gd, if you profess to be a Christian and yet don't know the answer to your question, you really need to revisit your salvation experience." He's said he wasn't a Christian.

If the Gospels aren't "forged", but just "unsigned", as Dr. Ehrman claims, why is he bringing that up? I notice he doesn't say whether or not he believes the Gospels to be true. Because, just as Satan did in the Garden, he is just introducing a little lie. Just enough to get people's attention diverted from the truth. I would assume that Dr. Ehrman believes the Gospels to be true. Otherwise, h...more

If the Gospels aren't "forged", but just "unsigned", as Dr. Ehrman claims, why is he bringing that up? I notice he doesn't say whether or not he believes the Gospels to be true. Because, just as Satan did in the Garden, he is just introducing a little lie. Just enough to get people's attention diverted from the truth. I would assume that Dr. Ehrman believes the Gospels to be true. Otherwise, he'd be a fool to call himself a Christian. His whole faith would be built upon a lie. It would be like believing in the story of Cinderella.
And why did he use the word "forged" if he really meant "unsigned"? Forged and unsigned are as different as black and red. The reason why, is to introduce a little doubt and lie. But I will give him this, he is helping make it clear who the true Christians are and who are social Christians.less

lpepper, that's because Rev is a pathological liar.

Sorry to hear that flea. That just shows that even though he may be considered an intellect by man, he is still a fool.

As I've said a number of times, gd. You are Scripturally and spiritually ignorant.