American Belief in Global Warming Takes a Dive

RevShnorrRocks »

Fri Oct 30, 2009 12:00 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

Slacker: ""I see no point in any further exchanges with you on this topic, so I won't be posting any more. But you go ahead and make one last post that will go unchallenged, and you can have the thrill of feeling that you got the last word, no matter how wrong and how uninformed you are."

I guess KLM is conceeding victory to Hawk, I guess the data isn't their to prove any point..."

I think it more likely that klm is wise enough to follow Proverbs 26:4

"Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him."

Senate Passes Hate Crimes Bill; Obama Expected to Sign

RevShnorrRocks »

Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:16 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

Daniel Paul: "Ever heard of the wrong person being put to death and the right person getting off because the punishment was already carried out? Same deal."

Indeed:
http://www.boston.com/news/world/africa/articles/2009/10/17/churches_denounce_african_children_as_witches/

Quote: "Pastors were involved in half of 200 cases of "witch children" reviewed by the AP, and 13 churches were named in the case files."

Christian Law Firm Fights 'Ridiculous' Criminal Charges Against School Officials

RevShnorrRocks »

Thu Oct 29, 2009 12:08 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

this is a test

Senate Passes Hate Crimes Bill; Obama Expected to Sign

RevShnorrRocks »

Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:05 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

Flagged as inappropriate. show garageguy: "Man, you crack me up with that crazy stuff." Kookology rocks! hide

Ex-Home Depot Worker to File Religious Discrimination Lawsuit

RevShnorrRocks »

Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:55 pm Agree: 27   Disagree: 16

Norman: "The person deserved to be fired."

If not for breaking company rules then for showing incredibly poor judgement. Some are foolish enough to use the court marshaled Gordon Klingenschmitt as a role model.

Hopefully he will lose the lawsuit badly and be forced to pay the other side's legal fees.

Hopefully he will insist on wearing the button to job interviews and because of this nobody will give him a job.

Hopefully he will explain to prospective employers the circumstances under which he thinks it is ethical to sue employers and because of this nobody will give him a job.

Such are the results of poor judgement.

To some putting "God" and "indivisible" in the same sentence is mocking truth.

Atheists Promote 'Good Without God' Message in Big Apple

RevShnorrRocks »

Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:32 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

"And it's all because of her religion. They drove me halfway out of her life and made me lose much of my respect for her. I find that very sad. I hope she and her religion are happy."

One nation, indivisible.

WRAP Week Mobilizes Americans to Take Action Against Pornography

RevShnorrRocks »

Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:29 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

believer: "Latest statistics says that over 90% of males strugglte with it ..."

Does one have to be in the 90% in order to be gullible enough to believe such an obviously bogus statistic?

Senate Passes Hate Crimes Bill; Obama Expected to Sign

RevShnorrRocks »

Tue Oct 27, 2009 9:32 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 1

Slacker: "Neither are you so get off your soap box, you know well that this legislation is only going to be used to force Christians to be quite and accept homosexuality when you know that they cannot."

Not putting homosexuals to death is accepting them.

Slacker: "Just like the socialist manifesto's from the 60's, which lays down exactly what you have to do to silence a section of the population, this legislations is going to be used to silence anyone that disagrees with homosexuality, regardless of what the actual legislation says."

Jailing criminals doesn't silence them.

New Survey Reveals Huckabee as GOP's Leading Contender for 2012

RevShnorrRocks »

Thu Oct 22, 2009 1:36 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 2

oldstudent: "Nice little dig you threw out but it is pure falsehood."

Those that claim it is ethical to knowingly add false information to wikipedia know pure falsehoods when they see them.

New Survey Reveals Huckabee as GOP's Leading Contender for 2012

RevShnorrRocks »

Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:30 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

Rhi Bran: "Palin in 2012."

And Palin in 2016.
And Palin in 2020.
And Palin in 2024.
And Palin in 2028.
And Palin in 2032.
And Palin in 2036.
And Palin in 2040.
And Palin in 2048.
And Palin in 2052.

Atheists Promote 'Good Without God' Message in Big Apple

RevShnorrRocks »

Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:07 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 2

Slacker: "Yeah so science education can fill their head with anger and hatred for their fellow man, just like it has done for you..."

Those with science education hate lies. They do not necessarily hate the liars. Think of it as the scientific equivalent of hate the sin love the sinner.

Liars hate truth and science education teaches how to find truth. Its no surprise that those liars with anger and hatred for their fellow man would project those very qualities onto those they hate for telling the truth.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

Atheists Promote 'Good Without God' Message in Big Apple

RevShnorrRocks »

Wed Oct 21, 2009 7:41 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 2

Stupidity has written its laws in our heart and that is the new covenant; therefore, an educated person can do ethical and moral things without acknowledging stupidity. However, everyone knows that stupidity is real, but many just want to reject stupidity in order to do whatever they want to do. However, before the final judgement occurs, every knee will bow in front of stupidity. Therefore, no one has to teach a person to be kind or know stupidity, because stupidity has already written the truth in people's hearts. Therefore, I can understand why educated people try so hard to hate stupidity and deny stupidity, because they know that stupidity exists. No one in their right mind would spend so much time fighting something that he or she feels does not exist. Educated people are actually spending thousands of dollars and sometimes millions of dollars to fight this stupidity, which they claim does not exist, LOL!

Dawkins Refuses to Debate Intelligent Design Scholars

RevShnorrRocks »

Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:58 pm Agree: 7   Disagree: 5

lpepperw: "I think everyone should consider this, ... is a virtual person, a figment of his own imagintion."

This looks to be a personal attack, prohibited by TOS. As such its another sterling example of ethics on display here, similar to claiming that it is ethical to knowingly add false information to wikipedia.

"He gives himself virtues that he thinks are superior to what he thinks is a Christian is."

Like proper use of English?

"He uses a Christian forum to spew his hatred and engage those he hates."

I've seen hatred here, but not from the individual you attribute it to.

"There are several people who use the Christian Post to do this."

Anyone who disagrees with a literal reading of the bible?

"I doesn't matter what the subject is ..."

Subject matter is irrelevant to a kookologist.

Dawkins Refuses to Debate Intelligent Design Scholars

RevShnorrRocks »

Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:29 am Agree: 9   Disagree: 5

believer: "... that doesn't change the fact he wimped out when he had a perfect opportunity to put those flukey theories of ID and Creationism to bed once and for all!!"

Examples of expert witnesses for the defense wimping out in Kitzmiller v. Dover:

John Angus Campbell (withdrew before deposition)

Richard M. Carpenter II, PhD (deposed, but did not testify at trial)

William Dembski (withdrew before deposition)

Warren A. Nord, PhD (deposed, but did not testify at trial)

Stephen Meyer (withdrew before deposition)

http://ncse.com/creationism/legal/expert-witnesses

According to believer's logic they all wimped out when they had a perfect opportunity to put those flukey theories of ID on the map and into the classroom.

Dawkins Refuses to Debate Intelligent Design Scholars

RevShnorrRocks »

Tue Oct 20, 2009 11:13 am Agree: 7   Disagree: 5

believer: "And Behe said, "...no one can give a detailed account of how the cilium, or vision, or blood clotting, or any complex biochemical process might have developed in Darwinian fashion...""

From the ruling of Judge Jones in Kitzmiller v. Dover:

Judge Jones: "We therefore find that Professor Behe's claim for irreducible complexity has been refuted in peer-reviewed research papers and has been rejected by the scientific community at large."

Judge Jones: "Professor Behe's concept of irreducible complexity depends on ignoring ways in which evolution is known to occur."

Judge Jones: "Contrary to Professor Behe's assertions with respect to these few biochemical systems among the myriad existing in nature, however, Dr. Miller presented evidence, based upon peer-reviewed studies, that they are not, in fact, irreducibly complex."

Judge Jones: "Professor Behe's only response to these seemingly insurmountable points of disanalogy was that the inference still works in science fiction movies."

Science fiction. LOL!

Judge Jones: "It is ironic that several of these individuals, who so staunchly and proudly touted their religious convictions in public, would time and again lie to cover their tracks and disguise the real purpose behind the ID Policy."

Calif. Conservatives 'Disappointed' with New Harvey Milk Day

RevShnorrRocks »

Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:34 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

u4eeeahhh: "How is it that you know what college I attended?"

I guessed, based on your account of being involved with protests and my assumption that you weren't an outsider.

u4eeeahhh: "Do you know my real identity?"

Doubtful, since you were slightly before my time. FYI we actually studied the protests in the rhetoric class I took in the College, but I don't remember names.

u4eeeahhh: "Spoken like a true Wahoo."

Indeed. I didn't know if you flagged the Wahoo comment, or if someone else flagged it out of ignorance or spite. It certainly wasn't meant as an insult, and a link was even provided as a clue for the clueless.

Based on your response it appears you didn't flag it, which makes the flagging look even more ridiculous.

Eating Chickenosaurus

RevShnorrRocks »

Fri Oct 16, 2009 2:19 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

"While genetics holds great promise, that promise is coupled with a temptation to play God. Never forget that the field started out as eugenics, the attempt to "improve" the human race by weeding out the unfit."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregor_Mendel

Quote: "Gregor Johann Mendel (July 20, 1822 – January 6, 1884) was an Augustinian priest and scientist, and is often called the father of genetics for his study of the inheritance of certain traits in pea plants."

The field of genetics "started out as eugenics"?

From the legal decision of Judge Jones in Kitzmiller v. Dover: "It is ironic that several of these individuals, who so staunchly and proudly touted their religious convictions in public, would time and again lie ...".

Dawkins Refuses to Debate Intelligent Design Scholars

RevShnorrRocks »

Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:21 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 1

The "science" of Discovery Institute senior fellow Michael Behe gets talen down here:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2009/10/15/the-blind-locksmith-continued-an-update-from-joe-thornton/

Quote: "Behe's argument has no scientific merit. It is based on a misunderstanding of the fundamental processes of molecular evolution and a failure to appreciate the nature of probability itself."

Quote: "Because Behe has grossly misinterpreted the results of my research to support his position, however, I feel some responsibility to set the record straight."

Looks like others agree with the position of Dawkins about debating "scholars" of ID, even if they make an exception to correct gross misinterpretation of their own research results.

Dawkins Refuses to Debate Intelligent Design Scholars

RevShnorrRocks »

Wed Oct 14, 2009 8:52 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

jar1961: "Do you mean like when the Scopes Monket Trial made a jackass out of Darwin and Clarence Darrow?"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scopes_Trial#Humor

Quote: "Overwhelmingly, the butt of these jokes was the prosecution and those aligned with it: Bryan, the city of Dayton, the state of Tennessee, and the entire South, as well as fundamentalist Christians and anti-evolutionists."

Calif. Conservatives 'Disappointed' with New Harvey Milk Day

RevShnorrRocks »

Wed Oct 14, 2009 7:12 pm Agree: 7   Disagree: 3

Flagged as inappropriate. show u4eeeahhh: "Comments like that really do help the Atheist Homosexual Secret Agenda Recruiting Army get new converts [look out for the pink helicopters]" Spoken like a true Wahoo. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wahoos hide