U.S. Appeals Court Rules in Favor of Anti-Abortion Displays

adawn »

Fri Jul 04, 2008 7:16 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

Clearly the situation was handled inappropriately by the law. However, I find myself questioning the actions of the pro-life activist. While I absolutely agree that abortion is abominable in the eyes of God and that it is nothing less than murder, I would never condone driving a truck around a school displaying pictures of any other type of homocide. Shooting someone in the head is wrong as well... but would that make it alright to display pictures of the crime scene? It was completely inappropriate. Messages can be presented without vulgarity. Indeed, the act of abortion in and of itself IS vulgar... but I don't believe that justifies displaying this type of photo.

Evolution Weekend Highlights Religion, Science Debate

adawn »

Sun Feb 10, 2008 5:18 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

Personal attacks are included in the definition of an inappropriate comment. Clearly, I have been unable to see all of the comments that you (bobx2x2) have made. However, if the comments below are reflective of some that were left earlier, then it is very clear to me that you have no problem using personal attacks to try and illustrate your points. If you have something to say, then say it! We have no problem with truth... but your statements are statements of your own personal opinion about the character of Christians. If your comments have actual intelligent content, then you should have no need to use personal attacks to try and add validity to your point. I think more people would be willing to listen to you if you were to come into a discussion without your hypothetical "guns blazing." Try using a little tact.