Israeli Paper Publishes Obama Western Wall Prayer, Draws Fire

amagoh »

Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:08 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

I have been reading the posts of others who are discouraged to see the smears and lies about Obama's faith and his Christian beliefs. I will say that Americans will believe what they want to believe based on a series of items: political allegiances, policy differences, religious differences, etc. Therefore, please pray for this nation and ask the Lord to allow the truth to rise above the countless attacks.

James Dobson Accuses Obama of 'Distorting' Bible

amagoh »

Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:43 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

This is no surprise. I have no further comment but to say again...this is NO SURPRISE!

Obama Supports Campaign for N. Korean Refugees

amagoh »

Fri May 16, 2008 3:54 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

Thankfully, this issue is above partianship. This issue needs worldwide attention and prayer. Thanks to Senators Obama and Brownback for their public support of this cause.

Christians Launch Campaign against Global Warming Hype

amagoh »

Fri May 16, 2008 3:49 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

Ladies and Gentlemen of Christianpost.com:

Visitors of this website have various religious and political views. I respect the sharing of views that may not agree with my Evangelical point-of-view based on Biblical teaching and evidence. However, I must say that I am utterly confused with why conservative Evangelicals are launching a campaign to say "We Get It" and reduce the issue of global warming and the green movement ot "fear-mongering". Yet, when we speak on the War on Terror (which has been going on long before the Bush Administration), these same conservatives are not reserved in expressing how the American people should not elect a particular candidate or the United States will be under attack again (another example of fear-mongering).

Instead of negatively attacking this article and those who have signed on to this campaign, I would like insights from the readers. I will readily admit my mistakes in analysis of what is being said. I would appreciate some insights on the article, because in my view, I am down right confused and bewildered by their stance. The earth may be warming naturally, but it is not to say we are not contributing to the problem. In fact, we may be increasing the speed by which the earth is warming.

Your thoughts? Thank you everyone. God Bless!

Evangelical Statement on Faith, Politics Stirs Up Religious Right

amagoh »

Fri May 09, 2008 12:58 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

In the course of my reading the comments on this board, I must respond. Initially, I did not read the Manifesto. According to the comments made on this board, the Manifesto should be viewed as a waste of time, bound for the landfills of the nation. I will only comment by saying that the Manifesto needs to be read and discussed widely. It is unfortunate that in this election cycle, any document is considered politically motivated rather than a document which substantially needs to be deliberated amongst leaders, scholars and those who love Jesus Christ. We are in a culture war, but this is not the culture war coined by Fox News' Bill O'Reilly. This culture war is not against flesh but principalities. The way we are judged is how we fight this war. Very interesting comments, I must say.

Obama Fights False Links to Islam

amagoh »

Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:33 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

Regarding "Black Theology":

There are books by James Cone and others that will help to understand the position of black theology and its development. In an elementary way, a summation of black theology is a form of liberation theology to bring justice and freedom to African Americans in spiritual, economic and political activism. The rise of black theology escalated due to the lack of response by the Church as a whole, especially during the times of slavery and in the Civil Rights Movement in the 50s and 60s.

Regarding Barack and His Pastor:
I think it is fair game to research his church, his pastor, and his Christian beliefs. However, because his pastor espouses a position does not mean Barack follows with blinders on. Already, many would like to frame him as someone to fear because the hope message cannot be true. McCain is trying to do it but in a sensitive way; get ready for an interesting race.

Obama Fights False Links to Islam

amagoh »

Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:24 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

I am very concerned when disparging remarks are made against any of the presidential candidates that are categorically false. The majority on this forum would support a Republican candidate, stating that they are more "family values" and "biblical" in their approach to politics. There are others who support the Democrats because they see a real effort in working on the issues of poverty, environment, war that they consider to be neglected for 8 years. Whatever your position, to pass false statements because its convenient is disheartening, especially from believers of Christ.

The probably nominee Senator Barack Obama and nominee Senator John McCain will have a civil campaign because both men are honorable in their approach. I am concerned about their supporters who would rather see ugliness. I pray that the Church will not be pigeon-holed again by putting total support in one candidate and seeing very little happen for the cause of Christ in the White House.

If you supported GW Bush, I am sure you had great intentions and motives. However, he has the lowest presidential rating in a generation. In fact, these ratings has caused the likes of Barack Obama to rise even higher. Even many Republicans are disappointed in this presidency. If Barack becomes president, will American Christians continue to attack the man without seeing how we could see the cause of Christ prosper? If John becomes president, will we not challenge him just because it is assumed Republicans are more Christian than Democrats (which by the way is not a true statement, but assumed in the mass media)?

I think the knee pads are in order, ladies and gentlemen.

Candidates Divvy Up Delegates; Race Not Settled

amagoh »

Wed Feb 06, 2008 4:57 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

SqueakyWheel: To suggest that to speak of unifying the country would automatically assume a biblical value being jeopardized is unfortunate. I must reiterate my respect for Dr. Dobson for his stance on a host of issues. Nevertheless, too many Christian leaders, in their attempt to stand for biblical values, are causing others to question if they are representing Jesus or political agendas.

If Dr. James Dobson does not vote for McCain, he should be respected for standing for what he considers to be a principled decision. But, come January 20, 2009, we will have a new president. Will Dr. Dobson and others disregard and continually criticize the leaders who are appointed? Will Focus on the Family, The Family Research Council and others continue to be looked upon as individuals who stand for principle and are limited politically to make an impact? I am thankful that you are confident that leaders are not being marginalized. However, we must start evaluating how the Lord desires to use our lives, biblical values, and our life reflecting Christ to make unify us.

Interestingly, we cannot move forward in unifying the country when we are not unified as a Body of Christ - spiritually, emotionally, racially, etc. Therefore, our discussion is a reflection how the use of extremes such as Hitler and other illustrations cause others to wonder, "When will the Church reflect the heart of Jesus Christ? When will the Church pride itself in being right with God, right in His Word, and reconciled with others?" I respect your comments SqueakyWheel and I thank you for your insights. I believe we both want to see the Kingdom advanced. However, the area of theological tension is how we move forward in seeing this accomplished with God's lead.

Candidates Divvy Up Delegates; Race Not Settled

amagoh »

Wed Feb 06, 2008 2:56 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

As a response to this article, I truly do not know what to say. I respect James Dobson for his positions and his pro-family stance. However, I cannot understand why he would not demand, from both political parties, the civic action on issues such as abortion, gay marriage, greater educational measures, assistance for the poor, global warming issues, etc.

This article demonstrates a sad reality: James Dobson, as with many other influential leaders in the Christian Right, have marginalized themselves. Presently, due to their disdain of McCain, they find themselves tied to a post of the past: only relate to those who agree with you. The fact remains that more Democrats voted in this quasi national primary than Republicans 2 to 1. Therefore, if either Senator Barack Obama or Senator Hillary Clinton win the presidency, James Dobson and others are only going to relegate their criticisms on radio and PR moves? Why not engage all political figures for higher standards, a greater moral majority (no pun intended), and unifying this country for once.

As a Christian, seminarian, and minister of the Gospel, I cannot understand this position. It seems to be more about political alignment and favors than Kingdom building. I welcome your responses and your input. God Bless You All!

Pro-Family Groups Blast Obama as 'Extremely Liberal'

amagoh »

Fri Jan 11, 2008 10:33 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 5

I would have been in agreement with this article of outlining the issues and positions of the candidates. However, I find it "interesting" that these gentlemen have decided to lambast Barack Obama. I guess they want to make sure that his message of hope and bringing people together does not say VALUE VOTERS. Very savvy....

Huckabee, Obama Sweep Up Victories in Iowa

amagoh »

Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:04 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

Evidently, Iowans desired to see positive, meaningful change in national politics and civil discourse. What an interesting development!

Black Evangelicals Emerging as New Conservatives

amagoh »

Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:03 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

"hey amagoh, i think u need to read the whole story and not just the heading... the 3rd paragraph from the bottom says "While black voters overwhelmingly identify themselves as Democrats..." .. and your statement about the New Orleans crisis made it seem like it was a launching point for Blacks against Replublicans but it was just a reason to deflect blame from mayor Nagin who did a terrible job of pre evacuating his city, if that New Orleans mayor would have acted more like Gulianni on 9/11 did, than maybe things would've been a lot smoother"

I need to respond to this comment. I did read the entire article and made comments accordingly. In regards to Blacks being against Republicans, I believe your take on my comments were displaced. African-Americans support Democrats, Republicans and Independents. However, I was trying to make the point that the New Orleans crisis reinforced an issue AAs have been complaining about for years. Mayor Ray Nagin and Governor Blanco were incomponent in their strategy and implementation. No doubt about it. Yet, I find it interesting that you never mention the President of these United States nor the former director of FEMA who also displayed national incompetence.

I have a serious problem with Kingdom people becoming party people. What do I mean? We are serving Jesus Christ, the Savior of our souls, the Redeemer of the world. And, we find ourselves vying for political points about who was incompotent on this issue or that issue. Rather, we need to look to proven leaders in our communities and national office and see how we can come together as a nation. This is the only way things will get done.

I do not agree with Barack Obama on every issue. I do not agree with the majority of politicians on every issue. But, I see a quality in Obama and Huckabee that is a long time coming. Two men, different parties that want to see civil discourse and unity in our country. Mentioning JC Watts is irrevelant. He was chosen by the Republicans to be the face of diversity. Unfortunately, he is not in the Republican leadership any longer and retired quite early. I find this interesting....

Black Evangelicals Emerging as New Conservatives

amagoh »

Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:36 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

Statistically speaking, African-Americans largely support Democratic candidates. I cannot understand how the author of this article and many in religious think tanks do not analyze one critical point. African Americans used to support the Republican party during the time of Lincoln. However, with the emergence of civil rights, the Republican party sided with segregationists. Am I saying this is the Republican party today? No. However, when black men and women are losing employment, cannot support their family, and find that a Republican adminstration shows startingly indifference when a family member is trapped in New Orleans, it raises red flags about the Republican party and "compassionate conservative values".

As a young African-American male in my 20s and in seminary, I hold to conservative beliefs: against abortion, against same-sex marriage, against the death penalty, against illegal immigration. Did you notice something? Everything I said was against. I am also for children, once born, having a fulfilling life with parents that are able to afford their education and support them. I am for a nation that will embrace those who have a homosexual lifestyle and show them the Biblical mandate without condemning and judging. I am for men who are on death row to see the grace that Jesus Christ offers, if they come with a willing heart and a contrite spirit.

See, we enjoy this. Conservatives v. Liberals. Republican v. Democrat. Black v. White. It is easy to do and place a sound byte to. Yet, our faith in Jesus Christ requires us to stop the divisions and see how we can advance the Kingdom through His love. Such a message is considered weak and we need to fight. Jesus already won the battle....why are we fighting as if we are defeated?

Let us be conservative in how we address others who may disagree with us and ask Jesus to help us in our view of the world. We all have filters....the prayer is for Jesus to increasingly become the lens we look through when regarding political and social issues of our day.

Obama Gains Ground with Black Christian Leaders

amagoh »

Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:20 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

Faith-based agenda? Interesting. The faith-based agenda is determined based upon who you ask. On the surface, the terminology sounds intriguing and Bible-based. Yet, with closer inspection, you will find that as faith-based initiatives are being dramatically underfunded, others suffer because non-profits are not being resourced adequately to meet felt-needs.

I appreciate Marantha's comments, although I disagree. Every candidate that is running for President (based on their words and actions) have not fulfilled what you consider "standing for God's Word". Unfortunately, our current president has not fulfilled this mandate as you subscribe. Listening to Barack Obama and Mike Huckabee (not in sound bytes, but in totality) shows me they are not perfect men, but willing to listen and lead with integrity. If we desire to have a leader of this nation to follow the Bible from A to Z, we need to stop the partisan bickering and start nominating individuals that exude this. Both the Democratic and Republican parties do not offer this.

To say, SqueakyWheel, that Barack Obama is a radical pro-abortion, anti-traditional marriage candidate also shows how we, as a nation, have made it a point to divide and define individuals on wedge issues. I am against abortion and gay marriage. I am also against the death penalty, mistreatment of the poor, lack of educational resources for our next generation, and the mistreatment of religious institutions. We have yet to address these issues because, as in the last two elections, we elect based on single issues and then wonder why we do not have the change we desire in our country and leadership. This is the reality that is truly sad.