If someone dies of anal cancer, it is anal cancer that kills them. However, the probability of contracting anal cancer by someone regularly engaging in homosexual sex is much higher, according to the nurse. According to her report, the risk of anal cancer soars for those engaging in anal intercourse. "According to one report, it rises by an astounding 4000%, and doubles again for those who are...more

If someone dies of anal cancer, it is anal cancer that kills them. However, the probability of contracting anal cancer by someone regularly engaging in homosexual sex is much higher, according to the nurse.

According to her report, the risk of anal cancer soars for those engaging in anal intercourse. "According to one report, it rises by an astounding 4000%, and doubles again for those who are HIV positive."

The sources she quotes are:
[iiib] Fenger, C. "Anal Neoplasia and Its Precursors: Facts and Controversies," Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology 8, no. 3, August 1991, pp.190-201; Daling, J.R. et al., "Sexual Practices, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, and the Incidence of Anal Cancer," New England Journal of Medicine 317, no.16, 15 October 1987, pp. 973-77; Holly, E.A. et al., "Anal Cancer Incidence: Genital Warts, Anal Fissure or Fistula, Hemorrhoids, and Smoking," Journal of the National Cancer Institute 81, no. 22, November 1989, pp. 1726-31; Daling, J.R. et.al, "Correlates of Homosexual Behavior and the Incidence of Anal Cancer," Journal of the American Medical Association 247, no.14, 9 April 1982, pp. 1988-90; Cooper, H.S., Patchefsky, A.S. and Marks, G., "Cloacogenic Carcinoma of the Anorectum in Homosexual Men: An Observation of Four Cases"; Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 22, no. 8, 1979, pp. 557-58. Also see Between the Lines, Michigan's statewide gay newspaper, reporting on the risk of anal cancer for men who have sex with men, http://www.afa.net/homosexual_agenda/ha031901.asp

If you have a problem with her report, take it up with her. But even if all her sources and experience are accurate, that would not change your opinion, because you are committed to homosexuality.less

JB, you're following the agenda of "The Overhauling of Straight America." Anyone who disagree with you, you personify as condemning, hateful, spreading misinformation, etc. Right on cue with the gay agenda, as outlined in The Overhauling of Straight America. We Christians don't hate you, but we will stand up to manipulation and deception, in hopes that you will repent because God loves you very mu...more

JB, you're following the agenda of "The Overhauling of Straight America." Anyone who disagree with you, you personify as condemning, hateful, spreading misinformation, etc. Right on cue with the gay agenda, as outlined in The Overhauling of Straight America. We Christians don't hate you, but we will stand up to manipulation and deception, in hopes that you will repent because God loves you very much.less

Daniel Paul, have you noticed how gays won't acknowledge their own manipulative game plan to spread the deception and sin of homosexuality? We have seen constantly at CP how gays are following the very same agenda. They have been exposed. I do feel sorry for gays who have naively and inadvertently been drawn into this deception by hard core reprobates. May God have mercy and open their eyes.

Obviously, any statement disagreeing with homosexuality is a lie to those committed to sinning homosexually, or they wouldn't continue sinning. If you have a problem with the medical report of the nurse above, I guess she should have her nursing license revoked because Dr. JB and Dr GD disagree. I'm not a medical professional so I can only quote her. But since you two are more learned than her, le...more

Obviously, any statement disagreeing with homosexuality is a lie to those committed to sinning homosexually, or they wouldn't continue sinning. If you have a problem with the medical report of the nurse above, I guess she should have her nursing license revoked because Dr. JB and Dr GD disagree. I'm not a medical professional so I can only quote her. But since you two are more learned than her, let her know that what she saw at Stanford University Medical Center was all a figment of her imagination.

Let her know that the following diseases to which active homosexuals are vulnerable are fake: Classical sexually transmitted diseases (gonorrhea, infections with Chlamydia trachomatis, syphilis, herpes simplex infections, genital warts, pubic lice, scabies); enteric diseases (infections with Shigella species, Campylobacter jejuni, Entamoeba histolytica, Giardia lamblia, ["gay bowel disease"], Hepatitis A, B, C, D, and cytomegalovirus); trauma (related to and/or resulting in fecal incontinence, hemorroids, anal fissure, foreign bodies lodged in the rectum, rectosigmoid tears, allergic proctitis, penile edema, chemical sinusitis, inhaled nitrite burns, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).less

JB, why do gays always deflect to attacking anyone who disagrees with them instead of dealing with what is quoted? I don't agree with Lively's Nazi stuff, but what I quoted is what needs to be addressed. Gay deflection is a constant diversion attack which is so evident here.

AskDrBrown, can you ask him to reply to some of the questions here?

And most scientific bodies are politically correct. Read Kuhn's Structures of Scientific Revolutions. There is NO proof about being born gay - that is only a rationalization for sin. Read the quote and tell me how you disagree with it.

It's a sure sign of wilful rebellion, that's for sure, but God has given free will to choose. Cancer is breaking out all over the world too, but I don't celebrate that.

MarvinGardens, Your exaggerations are typical of the gay agenda; there's a huge difference between disapproving of sin and legalizing and promoting sin.

JB jumping to generalizations, the normal gay strategy of demonizing the messenger of any message gays disagree with. Christianphobic and Colsonphobic attitudes. Par for the course.

quoting Scott Lively, "Unlike homosexuality, heterosexuality is immutable. To define heterosexuality as merely sexual conduct between people of compatible genders is to suppress a fundamental truth about what it means to be human. All human beings with the exception of hermaphrodites (people with genital deformities) are born with a reproductive system that is heterosexual by nature. We are either...more

quoting Scott Lively, "Unlike homosexuality, heterosexuality is immutable. To define heterosexuality as merely sexual conduct between people of compatible genders is to suppress a fundamental truth about what it means to be human. All human beings with the exception of hermaphrodites (people with genital deformities) are born with a reproductive system that is heterosexual by nature. We are either male or female. We have sexual feelings only because of chemical and other processes that are rooted in our procreative heterosexual design. Thus, a male sexual orientation toward a female (or vise versa) is self-evidently normal and natural. By contrast, a male-to-male or female-to- female orientation is self-evidently abnormal and unnatural. For homosexuality to be equivalent to heterosexuality, it would need to be rooted in its own homosexual physiology.

In reality, homosexuality is nothing more than same-gender conduct among people who are innately and unchangeably heterosexual. Homosexuality is thus biologically (and to varying degrees morally) equivalent to pedophilia, sado-masochism, bestiality and many other forms of deviant behavior, or behavior that deviates from the normal design-based function of the human being."less

Gays in denial. It's God fixing man's sinful choices. Hope you get help with your addiction.

Chris, check the link posted. It's their quote not mine, and does nothing to change the content. Gays constantly deflect rather than answer the tough questions. (As far as 1000 different bibles, nonsense. There are many different translations from the original Hebrew and Greek, but they have the same content about Christ, with minor variations in some verses. ) But bibles are not the issue here -...more

Chris, check the link posted. It's their quote not mine, and does nothing to change the content. Gays constantly deflect rather than answer the tough questions. (As far as 1000 different bibles, nonsense. There are many different translations from the original Hebrew and Greek, but they have the same content about Christ, with minor variations in some verses. ) But bibles are not the issue here - it's about the deceptive strategies of the gay movement.less

Instead of segwaying about archives, why not answer the quote about the myth of being born gay?

writerJerome,(part 2) Since the "gay" movement can't prove it, the assertion that homosexuals are "born that way" remains nothing but a hypothesis: one which provides no justification for abandoning long- standing, experience-tested social policies. Remember, society doesn't have to prove that homosexuality is not innate. "Gay" activists are the ones attempting to change things and the burden of p...more

writerJerome,(part 2) Since the "gay" movement can't prove it, the assertion that homosexuals are "born that way" remains nothing but a hypothesis: one which provides no justification for abandoning long- standing, experience-tested social policies. Remember, society doesn't have to prove that homosexuality is not innate. "Gay" activists are the ones attempting to change things and the burden of proof is theirs.


Nevertheless, there is plenty of evidence that homosexuality is not innate. There is a very considerable body of testimony from tens of thousands of men and women who once lived as homosexuals. These ex-"gays" have renounced their former lifestyles and many have become heterosexual in self-identification and desire, while others have stopped at the point of comfort with their own gender and freedom from same-sex desires. The "gay" movement's challenge to former homosexuals to, in essence, prove they aren't still innately "gay" is the height of absurdity since homosexual immutability was never proven in the first place.


Why is the question of immutability so important? Because if homosexuality is not innate, it must be acquired. And if it can be acquired, we dare not allow homosexuality to be legitimized to our children. If there remains any shadow of doubt as to the cause of homosexuality, we must err on the side of protecting our children. Indeed we must actively discourage them from viewing homosexuality as safe and normal, when in fact it is demonstrably neither safe nor normal. It bears noting here that normalcy is functioning according to nature or design. Normalcy is not based on popular opinion.


In summary, the true definition of homosexuality is same-gender sexual conduct. A homosexual is a person who defines himself or herself by the participation in or desire to participate in such conduct. This definition is both logical and intuitively sound."less

writerJerome, your arguments that a gay person cannot change hinge on one faulty assumption: that a gay person is born that way. Quoting Scott Lively: "There exists no truly objective means of determining whether a person is innately homosexual. One cannot take a blood test or DNA test to prove that he or she is "gay." We must depend entirely upon a person's claim that his or her homosexuality ...more

writerJerome, your arguments that a gay person cannot change hinge on one faulty assumption: that a gay person is born that way.
Quoting Scott Lively:
"There exists no truly objective means of determining whether a person is innately homosexual. One cannot take a blood test or DNA test to prove that he or she is "gay." We must depend entirely upon a person's claim that his or her homosexuality is innate. The taint of political self- interest alone makes such evidence wholly untrustworthy. Self-declared homosexuals can't even prove that they really believe that their homosexuality is innate. Instead, they argue that homosexuality must be innate because no one would choose to be "gay" and incur the resulting social stigma. This argument is invalid, since many people choose lifestyles that others condemn. Moreover, there are many homosexuals who freely admit that their lifestyle is a voluntary preference.


On the question of choice, it must be noted that all sex but rape is voluntary and thus every sexual act involves a conscious choice. A person's inclination toward a form of sexual conduct may not, for any number of reasons, be consciously chosen, but the mere existence of desire does not justify the act. To accept otherwise would be to validate adultery and pedophilia. Society has the right to require people to suppress harmful desires, even if it is difficult for them to do so.


In reality, the "gay" movement does not want a biological cause to be found. If science were to identify a biological cause of homosexuality, that day would begin the "race for the cure." (And a great many purportedly happy homosexual men and women would secretly join that race.)less

A worthwhile read: STRATEGIES OF THE HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT: "The Overhauling of Straight America" http://www.article8.org/docs/gay_strategies/overhauling.htm "The following article titled "The Overhauling of Straight America'' was written by Marshall K. Kirk and Erastes Pill and appeared in Guide Magazine, a homosexual publication, in November 1987. This landmark article has become a "bible...more

A worthwhile read:
STRATEGIES OF THE HOMOSEXUAL MOVEMENT: "The Overhauling of Straight America"

http://www.article8.org/docs/gay_strategies/overhauling.htm

"The following article titled "The Overhauling of Straight America'' was written by Marshall K. Kirk and Erastes Pill and appeared in Guide Magazine, a homosexual publication, in November 1987. This landmark article has become a "bible" of the homosexual movement, and has since been widely re-published on the Internet and elsewhere. It outlines strategies and techniques for a successful widespread propaganda campaign to confuse and deceive the American people and demonize opponents. Like all propaganda, their methods are based not on solid intellectual arguments, but instead upon emotional manipulation of the public in an attempt to gain widespread sympathy and approval for homosexual behavior.

As you read this, keep in mind that it was written in 1987 -- less than two decades ago -- and look around to see how far the homosexual movement has gotten using these techniques."less

2011 calls it "religious chanting." We Christians call it God's Word of truth, so we quote it constantly because unrepentant sinners need their brain and their heart washed. One day we will all find out who was doing the right "chant."

Re: pedophilia, quoting Scott Lively: "Sexual orientation" is a highly ambiguous term loaded with hidden false assumptions. An "orientation" describes the perspective of a subject toward an object. A sexual orientation therefore describes a person (subject) by the object toward which they are sexually attracted: a homosexual is someone oriented toward someone of the same sex, a bisexual towa...more

Re: pedophilia, quoting Scott Lively:
"Sexual orientation" is a highly ambiguous term loaded with hidden false assumptions.


An "orientation" describes the perspective of a subject toward an object. A sexual orientation therefore describes a person (subject) by the object toward which they are sexually attracted: a homosexual is someone oriented toward someone of the same sex, a bisexual toward both sexes, a pedophile toward children, a sado-masochist toward giving or receiving pain, etc..


By definition, there are an unlimited number of potential sexual orientations. The "gay" movement, however, arbitrarily recognizes only four orientations: heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual, and transgendered (i.e. transvestites and transsexuals). Why? Because to recognize other orientations -- pedophilia, for example -- would draw attention to the importance of distinguishing between orientation and conduct, when a major purpose of sexual orientation theory is to legitimize and protect homosexual conduct by obscuring this distinction.


This is most clearly seen in anti-discrimination policies that include sexual orientation. Government and corporate policy makers include sexual orientation in anti-discrimination policies in order to protect freedom of thought and speech on the basis of the claim that sexual orientation is nothing more than a state of mind. Americans rightfully cherish the First Amendment right to think and speak freely. The practical effect of such policies, however, is to legitimize and protect any sexual conduct associated with an orientation. For example, under such policies a landlord is expected to rent to homosexuals even if they admit they intend to commit sodomy on the property and this is his sole reason for wanting to deny their application.


Why is this distinction between orientation and conduct so important? Because sexual conduct has serious public health consequences which society has both a right and an obligation to regulate. In contrast, there are no public health implications to sexual orientation, properly defined. Even a pedophile's orientation, abhorrent as it may be, is harmless to the public if he never acts upon it.


Policy makers could stop this end run around public health considerations by adding one sentence to existing anti-discrimination laws: "This policy shall not be construed to legitimize or protect any sexual conduct deserving of regulation in the public interest." The right to claim a sexual orientation should not automatically grant a license for sexual conduct.

Another purpose of sexual orientation theory is to create a context in which homosexuality and heterosexuality hold equal status. The notion of equivalency between homosexuality and heterosexuality is very important to "gay" arguments. For one thing it neutralizes health and safety arguments against the legitimization of homosexuality.less

Then I have to assume you can't "debunk" their arguments because you can't dispute the medical issues brought on by practicing homosexuality. This has nothing to do with Westboro. It has everything to do with medical issues.