Pro-Family Group Says Effort to Ban Calif. Gay 'Marriage' Looks 'Strong'

thresholds »

Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:31 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

The quotes should be around pro-family as in "pro-family" not around gay marriage. There is nothing pro-family about denying children health benefits, social security benefits, legal standing, etc. with both parents. This is anti-family and anti-children. It may surprise you, but most children who are being raised by gay parents want and love those parents. What do you propose, taking the children away and putting them in a home with strangers so they have a “mom” and a “dad”? Or are you just ok with just marginalizing these children in your “holy war” against gays. It’s ok for you to take away the legal protections of these children of gays because the children are just casualties of your “holy war”. These innocent children pay the price of your idolization of some perfect family, an Ozzie and Harriet that only exists in your dreams. In the real world a child needs the protections afforded by society and for the child’s family that marriage and adoption provide. … and I’m talking the child’s real gay parents, not your fantasy Ozzie and Harriet parents.