How to Share Your Faith Using Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed

truth_revealed »

Thu Apr 24, 2008 11:20 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

AGENT ORANGATANG- Regarding the word "theory": ...which *some believe can have a totally new and DIFFERENT meaning when it comes to "science"...but ONLY then!

Of *COURSE* the word "theory" has a "particular" meaning "in the context of science" because "SCIENCE ITSELF" conveniently **MADE it that way! That has to be one of the most ridiculous uses of deceitful hypocrisy that I've yet to encounter.
WHY is this particular meaning only used in "science"? Hmm?..Because science has to have a way to make their "hypothesis and theory" APPEAR as "FACT" to delude the masses!.
That's deliberately deceiving, self -serving and outrageously hypocritical.
In a nutshell...UN-trustworthy!
Shouldn't we expect much more than that from our "faithful scientists" who seem to control so much of what one thinks and believes???
The word THEORY can evidently ONLY be used in such a manner by SCIENCE...because THEY *invented* the "extension of the definition" and made it their very own for their own dilusional purposes.
When there's ONE rule for science and ANOTHER rule for everyone else that's sheer hypocrisy. NOT SCIENCE.
What's WORSE is that evolutionists FALL for the it !! - Talk about gullible and non-educated!

Having said all that I WILL agree that there are times when a hypothesis IS actually proven to be true...but only AFTER it has been *TESTED* and produces HARD convincing EVIDENCE. Once it has been tested and PROVEN then it CAN (generally) be trusted as a "FACT". But for it to be put forth as absolute TRUTH (fact) it "must" be supported "by HARD FACTUAL EVIDENCE" to make it so.
If a scientist tells me "The dog is peeing on the carpet" I would expect some proof. I would go in, SEE the dog peeing on the carpet...see the wet spot and maybe even smell it and feel it... just to be certain. If I was still not convinced, I might even take some of the wet substance into my lab and test it to be sure that it was REALLY urine. I would then most likely find that it was INDEED urine. In THAT case, when the statement or hypothesis IS SUPPORTED by HARD FACTS (I *saw* the dog peeing on the carpet, I TESTED the urine etc) then it has EVERY right to be called a TRUTH or a FACT. But then and ONLY then.
MANY so-called "Scientific FACTS" are NOT supported by any such evidences. THIS is where they very conveniently stick in their "other" deceptive meaning for "theory".
Claiming that "It's truth because we SAY it's truth...but we have no real proof to back it up".
GIVE me a BREAK!
To recap once more for those of who JUST don't get it yet:
A theory is ALWAYS going to be "a theory" unless or until it's PROVEN true.
SCIENCE ITSELF conveniently *changed* the true definition to the following:
"It may also SOMETIMES mean FACT"
...but ONLY when it suits their own selfish purposes.
At ANY OTHER time, it simply means what it means; a theory. ;o)

How to Share Your Faith Using Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed

truth_revealed »

Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:24 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

LOL...It looks as if the atheists are becoming a bit nervous....seeing that truth is finally, and irrefutably being revealed. The "THEORY" of evolution (with "theory" meaning no more than a guess or hypothesis) *WILL* be exposed for the psuedo-science that it is...and it will be exposed by SCIENCE itself. It's only a matter of time. ;)