Casey Anthony Book: Prosecutor Jeff Ashton Reveals Why Anthony Was Acquitted (VIDEO)

0
By Herbert Pinnock , Christian Post Reporter
November 15, 2011|10:59 am

A prosecutor in the Casey Anthony murder trial is releasing a tell-all book about the case, revealing his thoughts on how Caylee died and explains why Anthony was acquitted.

 Casey Anthony Trial: Prosecutor Jeff Ashton Reveals Why Anthony Was Acquitted

Prosecutor Jeff Ashton is promoting a new book Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony in which he reveals the contents of Casey Anthony's psychological report which has never been disclosed before.

According to the Orlando Sentinel, Ashton claims that right before the start of the trial, Casey related to two mental health experts that her father, George Anthony, killed her child in the family pool.

According to Ashton, Anthony also claimed that she had been abused by her father and expressed concern that he would have done the same thing to her daughter.

Ashton details what the prosecution got wrong in the trial, and reveals why he is convinced of Anthony's guilt in the death of her daughter.

The two doctors were not called to testify at the trial, neither was the defendant, Anthony. Still, Ashton will reveal the particulars of how the case would eventually unfold.

Ashton said, "I look forward to the opportunity to share the story of the three years we spent prosecuting the person responsible for the death of Caylee Anthony." 

“Imperfect Justice” hits bookshelves Tuesday.

Video By: Scott Liu
Advertisement
Top Stories

Gay Partners Amendment Left Out of Immigration Bill

The Senate's immigration reform bill was passed out of the Judiciary Committee Tuesday without the "Leahy amendment" that would have given family status to gay and lesbian partners of U.S. citizens.

Boy Scouts Does Not, Will Not, Ask Scouts About Their Sexuality

The Boy Scouts of America does not currently ask ...

Judge to Decide If Yoga Belongs in Public Schools

A California judge began hearing arguments this week in a civil rights case concerning whether one yoga form's religious roots should prevent it from being taught in a public school system.