Combat Ban on Women Lifted by Leon Panetta; Soldiers Push Back Against Law

0
  • panetta
    (Photo: REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst)
    U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta (L) and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff U.S. Navy Admiral Michael Mullen (R) begin their first joint news conference at the Pentagon in Washington, August 4, 2011.
By Brittney R. Villalva , Christian Post Reporter
January 23, 2013|5:02 pm

U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta has lifted the combat ban on women, which prevented female soldiers from seeking front line jobs in the military. The decision has reignited the debate on whether or not men and women are truly treated as equals in the U.S.

Senior defense officials announced the decision, which could open positions to women as soon as this year, on Wednesday in anonymity; Panetta will not announce the change until Thursday, according to the Associated Press.

Some reports have stated that pressure to open combat positions has come from outside the military and not necessarily from women who are seeking the positions within.

"I am not personally hearing female Marines, enlisted or officer, pounding on the doors of Congress claiming that their inability to serve in the infantry violates their right to equality," Capt. Katie Petronio stated an article for the Marine Corps Gazette.

Proponents for removing the ban have argued that women are already serving in combat positions within the military, excepting direct ground combat (DGC). They suggest that the 15 year-old policy is outdated, although others fear that the people with these views fail to have relevant military experience.

"This issue is being pushed by several groups one of which is a small committee of civilians appointed by the Secretary of Defense called the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Service (DACOWITS)," Petronio said.

Follow us

Her concern is that "none of the committee members are on active duty or have any recent combat or relevant operational experience relating to the issue they are attempting to change."

An Army Sergeant from the 1st Recruiting Brigade who spoke under the condition of anonymity to The Christian Post raised other concerns as well. A former infantryman who was deployed twice to Iraq with the 1st Calvary Division, he believes that "sexual distraction" could prevent males and females from building the camaraderie necessary to survive on the front line.

Panetta's decision will give military officials until 2016 to seek exceptions, allowing a possible continuance of the ban on select positions. The announcement could open more than 230,000 jobs to females, according to AP.

Advertisement
Top Stories

Why Is the Pro-Life Message Winning and Traditional Marriage Losing?

Since Roe vs. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court ...

Nearly 14,000 US Churches Signed on for 'My Hope America with Billy Graham'

The Billy Graham Evangelistic Association recently launched "Lose to Gain," its second half-hour video program installment of the My Hope America with Billy Graham campaign series. With less than five months remaining in the ...

NY Gov. Cuomo's Abortion Plank Back in Play in New York Senate

New York lawmakers have extended their ...

Interview: Frank Page Speaks Candidly About Suicide, Loss of His Daughter

Frank Page, president of the Southern Baptist ...

House Passes Federal Ban on Abortion at 20 Weeks; Bill Moves to Senate

Members of the House voted 228 to 196 Tuesday ...