CP Opinion

Tuesday, Oct 21, 2014

Pakistan: Death to the Blasphemer, Death to Human Rights

December 22, 2013|12:35 am

The issue of Pakistan's blasphemy laws has always been alive in the public discourse and an attraction for the media not only in Pakistan, but internationally, too. Now it will be reverberating even more around the corridors of power after the Federal Sharia Court of Pakistan ordered the Pakistani government to remove the option of life imprisonment for blasphemy. This means that crimes of blasphemy should be punished exclusively by the death sentence.

The court, which has the power to determine whether any law is unislamic, reasons that any punishment other than death for blasphemy is not lawful. This was the conclusion of a five-member bench headed by Justice Fida Hussain, which was formed to explore this question after a contempt of court petition was filed by lawyer Hashmat Habib on December 4. The bench based this conclusion on a previous decision by the court in 1990 determining that life imprisonment should be deleted on the grounds that any blasphemy act is not acceptable and the blasphemer is liable to be punished by death.

Habib's complaint was that the 1990 decision had not been implemented and so the court should now issue orders to rectify this, as well as initiate court proceedings against those who have hitherto failed to implement the decision. Coincidentally it was Ismail Qureshi, another lawyer and writer of the book, Blasphemy law (Urdu language), who submitted a petition to the court to remove the alternative punishment of life imprisonment. The court ruled in October 1990 that the alternative punishment should be deleted as it was repugnant to Islam and the government was directed to add a provision to the effect that any act of blasphemy upon other prophets should also be punishable with death.

The government was told to amend Section 295-C by April 30, 1991. The government actually tried to file an appeal against the court verdict but it was withdrawn because Qureshi and some other people had met the then prime minister Nawaz Sharif and requested him to withdraw the appeal. Sharia courts were constituted in 1979 by Zia Ul Haq, and were a part of his program to Islamize the country and its laws. Nawaz, who is considered his protégé, unfortunately, continued Zia policies and passed Shariah laws in 1990. Nawaz Sharif has for the third time become prime minister and has recently taken to office. His government is already facing so many challenges but the main challenges are terrorism and economy, but political crises are imminent as the head of the PTI, Imran Khan Said, has already blocked NATO's supply and even threatened that if his government is dismissed Sharif's government will go too.

The situation seems quite complex internally as pressure could come from religious and extremist groups as the PML-N has close ties with extremist groups, especially in Punjab, from the opposition and from the Sharia court, too, while externally Pakistan is already facing a lot of pressure from the West. On Maplecroft's Human Rights Risk Index 2013, Pakistan is ranked number five on the extremist list. USCIRF has already recommended that the U.S. state department include Pakistan in its list of countries of particular concern (CPCs). Importantly, on December 3 the British House of Commons debated about the persecution of Christians. Several MPs including the ex-foreign minister responsible for Pakistan, Mr Alister Burt, and Rehman Chishti also took part. Rehman said: "I come from a Muslim background, and my father was an imam. When I saw that the topic was 'Persecution of Christians in the 21st century', I knew that it was absolutely right and proper to have a debate on that subject. It is important for the world to realize that persecution goes on. The Blasphemy law is at the root of much suffering and persecution of Christians in Pakistan. The use and abuse of this law is the fundamental issue underpinning discrimination and open violence against Christians and local churches."

After a years of struggling by many, a final decision is going to be made by the EU on December 10, which is also International Human Rights Day, about granting GSP Plus status to Pakistan. If it happens, it will be a real boost to the Pakistani economy but it is dependent on the improvement of human rights and the situation of minorities, too, and according to some reports, Pakistan has moratorium on the death penalty only because of the GSP Plus decision and the aid programs it is dependent on. On the same day as the debate in the British Houses of Parliament on blasphemy, a delegation from the Church of Scotland headed by Moderator Lorna Hood met with the Pakistani High Commissioner, Wajid Shams ul Hassan, and raised their concerns about the misuse of blasphemy laws. All the attention being paid by the international community to the human rights situation in Pakistan, and the calls for improvement, are apparently having little effect, as it was just one day after the concerns of the British MPs and the Church of Scotland were raised that the Federal Sharia Court set sent a strong message to the world in the opposite direction of human rights. It is said that Nawaz Sharif is a changed politician, and that he learned a lot during his exile in Saudi Arabia. Now is the time for him to prove it. If he doesn't implement the order of the Sharia court, the court and extremists will bear down on him to make him do it. Yet if he does implement this order, then how he is going to face pressure from the international community to improve Pakistan's human rights record?

Whatever he does it has far reaching consequences for his government and for the country. He has a good team and can come up with some solutions acceptable to both internal and external powers, but let's pray for him that God grants him courage and wisdom to make the right decision for Pakistan and for the people of Pakistan as implementation will cause more vigilante killings, more attacks and more bloodshed in the name of religion. The question is how we are going to avoid this chaotic situation? Can Pakistan roll back its Islamic program started by Zia ul Haq? Can the government and army change their policies? If so, we must be ready for the worst. Pakistan's blasphemy laws have caused enough damage to us so there is a need to deal with them carefully and with political wisdom. Otherwise this issue is never going to end. It has already started devouring Pakistani society from within.

Minorities feel themselves insecure and unsafe in the existence of blasphemy law as there is a long history vigilante killings, judicial killings, attacks on churches, torching Christian villages and towns, burning innocent people alive and even charging innocent children like Rimsha. Religious hatred, extremism and intolerance are at a peak. But we are living in the 21st century, the world has become a global village and we cannot live in isolation anymore. The Pakistani government needs to remember this and create a tolerant environment where we can discuss this controversial law, without any fear of life, and make the right decision. I suggest that Prime Minister Nawaz needs to form a cross party forum and alongside hardline Ulemas and politicians, needs to consult with people like Hafiz Tahir Ashrafi and Javed Ahmad Ghamdi. We have done enough to radicalize our Pakistani society, and now is the time to build a harmonious and tolerant society, otherwise we are on the brink of complete destruction.

Nasir Saeed is the UK Coordinator of the Center for Legal Aid, Assistance and Settlement, an organization providing free legal aid and practical support to persecuted Christians in Pakistan
Source URL : http://www.christianpost.com/news/pakistan-death-to-the-blasphemer-death-to-human-rights-111325/