Remember the old children's song, "First comes love, then comes marriage, then comes baby in a baby carriage?" Once, it was more than a song, it was a universal recognition of how most families come into being. But now, a new tune is being sung, and it is decidedly off-key.
A paper is about to released by the National Center for Health Statistics, part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which shows a major change in our culture. The Center reports that for the first time in over the last ten years, "shotgun cohabitations" outdistance "shotgun marriages." Translated, it means once, when a couple conceived a child out-of-wedlock, they would marry to save face and remove the stigma of illegitimacy. Now, they simply move in together, and skip the wedding.
Data from the government's National Survey of Family Growth states that from 2006 to 2010, 18 percent of all single, pregnant women chose to move in with the baby's father, compared to 5.3 percent who opted for marriage when a child was conceived. In the 1990's, almost 25 percent of couples that conceived before marriage would wed. During that same period, out-of-wedlock cohabiting births have grown from 11 to 24 percent. more >>
Young people's struggles and anxieties are not new, and their failure to get married or find a life-long job in their early 20s is no reason for their parents and grandparents to judge them, says historian Jon Grinspan.
"Their plight seems so 21st century: the unstable careers, the confusion of technologies, the delayed romance, parenthood and maturity," but "many of the same concerns and challenges faced the children of the Industrial Revolution, as the booms and busts of America's wild 19th century tore apart the accepted order," Grinspan wrote in an op-ed for The New York Times. In the piece, he told stories of 20-somethings still living with parents and waiting for love, and how they dealt with their problems in the 1800s.
"For rootless 20-somethings, each national shock felt intimate, rattling their love lives and careers," the historian wrote. more >>
Susan G. Komen suffered a 22 percent drop in donations last year, which may have been due to the controversy it recently had regarding its monetary ties to Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest abortion provider.
A spokeswoman for the breast cancer awareness organization acknowledged a strong decline in donations, according to the Associated Press.
"Citing audited financial statements posted on its website this week, a spokeswoman for the Dallas-based breast cancer charity said contributions - including donations and corporate sponsorships - dropped from about $164 million from the fiscal year ending in March 2012 to $128 million in the year ending March 2013," reported the AP. more >>
Have you ever wondered why you vote the way you vote? It seems it is a little more complex and a little less comical than some would like to make it.
Take the recent study by National Media Research Planning and Placement suggesting there might be a link between Republicans, Democrats and the type of alcohol they prefer. The study seems to be nothing more than an amusing diversion at best. Seems a better analysis would include having bartenders use the information to do some predictive analysis about which patrons are more likely to pay for their own drinks as opposed to those who might try to get their drinks for free.
Or how about the new study which will probably make the rounds on late night comedy shows from The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science which found that felons favored Democrats six-to-one in three states which allow felons to vote, post incarceration, according to the Washington Examiner. more >>
Like the sun rises in the East or that Kanye loves Kanye. Another indisputable truth is that - after its passage and being upheld by the Supreme Court, and after its implementation and subsequent unilateral changes by President Obama and his administration - you still don't know what this law is, how it works or why you should even care. By this time, you're disgusted; you just want to start again.
That Administration doesn't want to start again. They want to pretend that all is well while they make unlawful (see, illegal) changes to the law to fit their political need. Recently, they changed the individual mandate - the heart and soul of Obamacare. If you had a plan cancelled, like millions have across the nation, you can now register for a bare bones policy (the kind that is illegal under Obamacare, but now Obama says you can have one, so just keep it on the down-low, cool?) But, it only applies to those under 30 or those with a hardship. I'm not sure what they mean by hardship, but it could be something like, "Hey! This damn website don't work worth a crap! Now what the hell am I supposed to do?"
Since its inception, the Obama Administration has unilaterally changed the law more than a dozen times. These changes did not make their way through the House and Senate with major debate and recorded votes to await and eventually get the signature of the President. Those are laws. Here's an instructional video for those of you who may not be familiar with how our system of government works: more >>
2013 was the year of Obamacare whoppers. But the nastiest truth about the health law is still to be exposed – the tightening hold the federal government will have over your doctor, even if you're paying with private insurance. Obama said "you're not going to have anybody getting in between you and your doctor in your decision making." It was a lie from day one, just like the president's other sales pitches.
President Obama's often repeated claim that "if you like your health plan, you can keep your health plan" was the obvious whopper of 2013. Over six million people had their plans cancelled already.
Then, on December 20th, the president brushed aside reporters' questions about the latest changes to Obamacare by brazenly claiming "the basic structure of the law is working." That's a lie too. more >>