Recommended

Current Page: Politics | Friday, June 21, 2019
Federal court allows Trump admin. rule banning abortion funding through Title X to take effect

Federal court allows Trump admin. rule banning abortion funding through Title X to take effect

A sign is pictured at the entrance to a Planned Parenthood building in New York August 31, 2015. Picture taken August 31, 2015. | REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has allowed the Trump administration’s rule that prohibits Title X funds from being used to fund abortions to take effect.

In a unanimous decision released Thursday, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit granted the Department of Health and Human Services a stay against three preliminary injunctions issued by courts in California, Oregon, and Washington state.

Travis Weber, vice president for policy at the Family Research Council in Washington, D.C., said in a statement to The Christian Post that with the final rule being allowed to take effect, there will be “a bright line between abortion and family planning programs — just as federal law requires and the Supreme Court has upheld.”

“To comply with this rule, Title X clinics must maintain both physical and financial separation from abortion services and will no longer be allowed to refer clients for abortions,” said Weber. “While we await the final ruling on the merits of this case, [Thursday's] ruling from the Ninth Circuit is a great first step in ending the forced partnership between the Title X program and the abortion industry.”

Dr. Leana Wen, president of Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion business in the U.S., denounced the Ninth Circuit order as “devastating for the millions of people who rely on Title X health centers for HIV tests, birth control" and other services. 

“We will be immediately seeking emergency relief from the Court of Appeals. Planned Parenthood will not let the government censor our doctors and nurses from informing patients where and how they can access health care,” said Wen. “We will continue to fight the Trump administration in the courts and alongside champions in Congress to protect everyone’s fundamental right to health care.”

In February, the HHS announced that it had finalized a federal rule that forbade “the use of Title X funds to perform, promote, refer for, or support abortion as a method of family planning.”

“Pursuant to congressional mandate, family participation is to be encouraged, particularly in services involving adolescents. And, from the start, Congress was clear that Title X funds cannot be used to support abortion,” the HHS said at the time.

“This final rule ensures that grants and contracts awarded under this program fully comply with the statutory program integrity requirements, thereby fulfilling the purpose of Title X, so that more women and men can receive services that help them consider and achieve both their short-term and long-term family planning needs.”

HHS’ final rule also ended the requirement for an abortion referral for family planning and removed the requirement for Title X providers to counsel on and refer for abortion.

The new rule was met with a wave of legal action. By March, lawsuits were filed by the state of California, 21 other states plus the District of Columbia, and another suit by Planned Parenthood and the American Medical Association.

In April, lower court rulings granted preliminary injunctions against the Final Rule, including one by U.S. District Judge Stanley A. Bastian of Washington state.

“Plaintiffs have demonstrated the Final Rule likely violates the central purpose of Title X, which is to equalize access to comprehensive, evidence-based, and voluntary family planning,” ruled Judge Bastian earlier this year.

“It is worth noting that Plaintiffs have submitted substantial evidence of harm … Yet, the government’s response in this case is dismissive, speculative, and not based on any evidence presented in the record before this court.”

Follow Michael Gryboski on Twitter or Facebook

Sponsored

Most Popular

More In Politics