Advanced Search

Clinton's 'Gutsy' Church Appearance Softens Evangelicals

By
Christian Post Reporter
Sat, Dec. 01 2007 08:17 PM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

Democratic presidential frontrunner Hillary Clinton made what some called a “gutsy move” this past week when she appeared at a conservative evangelical megachurch to talk about AIDS.

Enlarge this Image
HIV/AIDS
(Photo: AP Images / Chris Carlson)
Democratic presidential hopeful, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., speaks at the Global Summit on AIDS & The Church at Saddleback Church in Lake Forest, Calif., Thursday, Nov. 29, 2007.

Initially, some felt ill at ease over the New York senator’s appearance at the Global Summit on AIDS and the Church hosted by Saddleback Valley Community Church because of her support for abortion and gay rights, which most evangelicals are opposed to. However, her emphasis on her Christian faith – which she regularly backed with Bible quotations – and concerns for the AIDS pandemic softened some evangelicals’ view of the candidate often painted by conservatives as liberal, calculative and cold.

“I saw a softer side of her that I haven’t seen before,” said Saddleback Church member Cindy Logan to WorldNetDaily. “She was very articulate. I liked her approach.

“I liked the fact that she’s been to Africa, she’s been with people who have been affected by AIDS, and she’s here because of her heart for people. I appreciated that.”

Another member of the Lake Forest, Calif.-based church, Tonie Kennedy, said inviting Clinton “was a good decision” after hearing her speech.

“It shows me she has her own faith,” Kennedy said, according to the San Francisco Chronicle, “and that she has an interest in what’s going on in the churches.”

Clinton shared about her upbringing in the Methodist Church and vowed to spend $50 billion on treatment, prevention and care for global HIV/AIDS by 2013 if she is elected, according to Reuters.

She also promised to “set a goal of ending all deaths from malaria in Africa” – where 1 million die annually from a preventable and treatable disease – by the end of a second term, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

“For many of us, the golden rule calls on us to act. Not only can we now talk about AIDS in church, but the Church is leading the way,” Clinton said of Saddleback’s AIDS initiative, according to Reuters.

The former first lady reportedly won a standing ovation from the audience of over 1,500 Christian pastors, nongovernmental organizations and church members.

Yet other Christian leaders remain opposed to her presence at Saddleback.

“What Saddleback is doing is helping raise her profile as a legitimate presidential candidate in the eyes of evangelical Christians, and I think that is a huge error,” said Tim Wildmon, president of the American Family Association, according to OneNewsNow.

The American Family Association, which has 2.8 million supporters, operates OneNewsNow.

Clinton was the only one out of six presidential candidates invited to accept Saddleback Pastor Rick Warren’s invitation to appear in person at the summit. All other invited candidates appeared via satellite.

Last year, Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-Ill.) appearance at the Saddleback AIDS summit caused significantly larger uproar than Clinton’s appearance this year. Pro-life groups organized protests against Obama and demanded Warren rescind his invitation for the pro-abortion senator to appear on the church stage.

Warren had responded – as he did again this year to opposition to inviting Clinton – that although he may differ with people over certain issues, he and Christians should work together on the common cause of helping millions of people living with HIV/AIDS.

Experts have noted that Clinton has much to gain from a favorable reception at the Saddleback conference.

An August Pew Research Center survey found that 58 percent of white evangelical Protestants surveyed that identified themselves as Democrat or leaning towards that party had an unfavorable impression of Clinton, Pew research director Scott Keeter said to Reuters.

A good reception at the influential megachurch might help Clinton make inroads among the evangelical voters.

“Sen. Clinton has the boldness to broaden her base…it shows she’s done her homework and she’s open to new ideas,” said Vivian Berryhill, president and founder of the National Coalition of Pastors’ Spouses, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

“We’re very religious in this country, and these are the people who helped elect [President] Bush,” Berryhill said as she motioned around the Saddleback worship hall. “So for her to come here is a gutsy move.”

The third annual Global Summit on AIDS and the Church concluded on Friday, and led up to the first-ever Youth Summit on Saturday, Dec. 1 – World AIDS Day also hosted by Saddleback Church.

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
gig
  • Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:31 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
the demons believe and tremble folks.
what a waste of editorial space.
maranatha7593
  • Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:35 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Does the fact that some early presidents owned slaves (who were freed upon their deaths), does that justify a president committing adultery??? I fail to see any logic, much less Biblical truth, there.
HyperionOverseer
  • Fri Dec 07, 2007 4:27 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
i'd say adultery, that is one thing that corrupts the soul,

servanthood and its extremity forms dont do much but make one lazy.
mcfbc
  • Thu Dec 06, 2007 3:46 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
I wonder what God considered worse, someone in the White House who was an adulterer or someone in the White House who owned slaves?
HyperionOverseer
  • Thu Dec 06, 2007 1:26 am
  • : 1
  • : 3
  • Flag
maranatha

you took the words RIGHT outta my mouth.

yknow
that's much like child molestation, everyone seems fine about UNTIL it is made public. weird huh?
maranatha7593
  • Wed Dec 05, 2007 11:14 pm
  • : 3
  • : 4
  • Flag
With all due respect, I haven't had the impression that Bill and Hillary have had a bona fide marriage. Arkansas State Troopers told of cordoning off city blocks when he was governor there so he could conduct his various liasons without it being public knowledge. It has seemed to me that this marriage for Hillary has been more of a business venture to advance her career, and that she was running the country as much as (if not more than) he when he held the title of president. Back in the olden days, this type of marriage of termed a marriage of convenience. In that light, I don't see that she had anything to "forgive", really, as they've both kept their end of the bargain in that respect. She seemed to be fine with the Monica mess *until* it became public knowledge.
HyperionOverseer
  • Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:17 pm
  • : 5
  • : 6
  • Flag
hillary? forgive?

is it even legal to say those words together?

that woman is bloodless, so cold she could could kill a volcano or two just by jumping in! (heck, maybe i should throw her in one to see for myself XD)

point being, she has no capacity for moral action in her soul, let her be president and there will be no USA after her term(s). and should that happen, i will be taking solace in my secondary choices of residence, free of her poisonous influence.

and last time i checked, true liberals dont forgive, they indirectly destroy their opposers through the hands they bribe or con. a vicious cycle. get too close and she'll swallow you whole, like a wolf.
holito8
  • Wed Dec 05, 2007 8:51 am
  • : 3
  • : 0
  • Flag
You inspire me to recognize the existence of a new level to the word 'audacity' and how one can acheive this, by staying married to a known adulterer(among other things), a feat i cannot match with any other person(s). Read Hosea 1:2. If she finds forgives in her heart, who are you to pass judgement. Forgiveness of other is a command. She has a right to leave him if she chooses. How many times has God forgiven you for breaking His commandments, statues, and judgements? If you break any part of the law you are guilty of breaking it all.

And holito, when did Jesus or the Apostles ever endorse a non-believer giving a sermon? Give me Scripture and versein context to support your premise. We are to discern good from evil holito. I am not judging those that are in the world and are blinded by sin, nor am I saying that everyone is perfect. I'm simply making a statement reflective of the fact that at a church, you do not bring in a candidate who is pro choice and allow them to speak from the pulpit where people are to hear the Whole Counsel of God; not this "social gospel".

Read Deut: 30:15-20, God has laid what He wants His people to do. God gave them a choice ,as Moses states, of live or death. Now if we pass a law of prolife, God is life; So all pagan(s) and non-religious (not really a group) person should be force to worship Him and follow His laws. We could start the crusade all over again.... O joy!. Lets be real are you guilty of break any of the laws of God. Has any of the other candidates been using their beliefs for support or is Hiliary breaking new ground? God allowed you to choose Him.

Are we Christians or pagan pretending to be Christians? Many people are picking and choosing what to follow. Many of us are pointing fingers outward first before pointing inward. Let us not be hypocrites. Do you really think God does not see what you are doing. We are suppose the set the example of holiness, not be a holy terror. We are suppose to walk, talk and be godly. We aren't advocating abstinence; we aren't teaching the blessing and curses. We are in a spiritua battlel. In war, you choice who you will follow.
HyperionOverseer
  • Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:08 am
  • : 0
  • : 7
  • Flag
i know what this is like

liek giving Satan the Key to the City and have him preach before a worldwide christian audience with their undivided attention to him!
YOU MAKE ME SICK CLINTON, EVERY LAST ONE OF YOU!
I need to wash this psychological filth from my heart now, but on a funny note, here are three POSITIVE things for Hillary,

1. I love how your nice woman facade is skin deep, like a shiny gold plate i cant see through easily!

2. You amaze me in ways never before for running for president, it wouldnt surprise me if one of us tried to assasinate you at your inauguration.(note i said IF)

3.You inspire me to recognize the existence of a new level to the word 'audacity' and how one can acheive this, by staying married to a known adulterer(among other things), a feat i cannot match with any other person(s).

there i tried XDDD

oh, and WHO is our prime represetative candidate for the presedency this time? I'm gonna miss Bush and all he's doing.
maranatha7593
  • Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:06 pm
  • : 6
  • : 0
  • Flag
God forbid we should ever have Ahab and Jezebel back in office again.
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here