Advanced Search

Anglicans Move Separate Ways Ahead of Major Meeting

By
Christian Post Reporter
Mon, Feb. 04 2008 12:22 PM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

The Episcopal Church's leader expressed confidence on Sunday that they will not be the only one standing up in support of gay clergy at an upcoming global conference.

"Many more [bishops] than you might expect are sympathetic," Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori said at the conclusion of a five-day tour honoring Chicago's new Episcopal bishop, according to The Chicago Tribune. "They are not, however, the loudest voices."

Jefferts Schori and Jeffrey Lee, the new Chicago bishop, are among several U.S. bishops who will be attending the Lambeth Conference in July. The meeting brings together leaders from the worldwide Anglican Communion every 10 years.

But this year's gathering comes in the midst of talks of schism and conservative bishops are opposing the invitation of U.S. bishops who supported the 2003 consecration of an openly gay bishop.

Archbishop Peter Jensen of the Diocese of Sydney released a statement Saturday saying he and other bishops in the diocese will not attend the Lambeth meeting.

"They (Sydney bishops) remain fully committed to the Anglican Communion, to which they continue to belong, but sense that attending the Conference at this time will not help heal its divisions," said the statement. "They continue to pray for the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Lambeth Conference."

Meanwhile, conservative bishops are holding a separate conference just ahead of Lambeth in hopes of going back to Christian roots and setting course for the future of the church. Many believe The Episcopal Church – the U.S. branch of Anglicanism – has departed from Scripture and traditional Anglican faith, notably on their liberal stance on homosexuality.

Nigerian Archbishop Peter Akinola, a leading conservative in the Anglican Communion, recently told press that the U.S. branch is not paying attention to Scripture but giving prominence to modern culture.

"They are bringing new principles to interpret scripture," Akinola said on Jan. 30 at the announcement of the separate conservative meeting called Global Anglican Future Conference (GAFCON). "Those of us who will abide with the Word of God, come rain come fire, are those who are in GAFCON. Those who say it does not matter are the ones who are attending Lambeth."

"What is the use of the Lambeth conference for a three weeks’ jamboree which will sweep these issues under the carpet," he added. "GAFCON will confer about the future of the church, which will set a road map for the future. We are a movement that will move away from the 'maybe – maybe not.'"

Akinola and bishops from Nigeria, Uganda and Rwanda also will not be attending Lambeth in addition to the bishops from Sydney, Akinola confirmed. Together, they represent more than 30 million Anglicans in the 77-million-member Communion.

Some bishops may attend both GAFCON and Lambeth.

Chicago Bishop Lee, who supports the full inclusion of gays and lesbians in the church, is pushing for bridge building rather than focusing on theological interpretations of Scripture.

"That's one of the tragedies afflicting the church right now," Lee said Sunday as he reminded parishioners that their call to ministry is by virtue of their baptism and not their liberal or conservative interpretations of Scripture, according to the local Tribune.

"So many of us seem to think that salvation depends on our theological correctness," he added.

Lee said he hopes to see a trend of listening and bridge building regardless of where bishops fall on the theological spectrum, rather than defending positions.

Lambeth Conference 2008 is a 20-day conference that will begin with a bishops retreat on July 17 at the University of Kent in Canterbury. As of late last month, about 70 percent of Anglican bishops worldwide confirmed they will be attending.

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
StJohn\'s
  • Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:29 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Former Episcopalian, Jesus' death on the cross was interpreted in many different ways by many different Christians in the early church. As to your anxieties about what if this new interpretation succeeds, I suggest we heed the advice of Gamaliel "if this plan or this undertaking is of men, it will fail; but if it is of God, you will not be able to overthrow them. You might even be found opposing God!"
Former Episcopalian
  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 2:49 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
“It appears to be happening again. Whether this new group succeeds, only time will tell, but let's not be self-righteous about it in the meantime.”

What if they do succeed in their quest for bringing into the church new avenues of salvation and are wrong? What happens to the people who buy into what these “new principles of interpretation” (especially on salvation) say and die before they are proven wrong? I would say that believers have every right to question this apostasy.

There isn’t one verse in the New Testament that says anything about another form of salvation other than through Jesus Christ. The early church was founded on this believe.

If there was another way to salvation what does Jesus’ death on the cross mean?
StJohn\'s
  • Wed Feb 13, 2008 7:00 am
  • : 1
  • : 1
  • Flag
Three hundred years ago, some Christians were in Akinola's words "bringing in new principles of interpretation" to promote the American Revolution and democracy against the Biblical concept of the Divine Right of Kings. Over two hundred years ago, other Christians were "bringing in new principles of interpretation" to oppose the firm foundation of Biblical support for the institution of slavery. It appears to be happening again. Whether this new group succeeds, only time will tell, but let's not be self-righteous about it in the meantime.
john14-6
  • Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:57 pm
  • : 2
  • : 2
  • Flag
pgcfriend--

Well said. If you deny the exclusivity of Christ as the only means of salvation and the only way to God, then you have abandoned all orthodox Christian doctrine and entered into heresy. But this is typical of all the liberal denominations (Episcopalian Church in America, ELCA, United Methodists, etc) that push that mushy, feel-good, all-grace-and-no-repentance, pseudo-new-age rubbish that they call Christianity. If there are other ways to salvation outside of Christ then you are denying Christ - because Jesus said he was the only way. And if I can find salvation outside of Christ then what do I need Christ for, or the Christian faith for, in the first place?
pgcfriend
  • Mon Feb 04, 2008 3:55 pm
  • : 14
  • : 4
  • Flag
Any Christian that will continue to follow a leader that says that Jesus is one of many ways to God really needs to leave there regardless of the homosexual clergy issue. It is no longer Christian. The new leader of the Episcopal Church has turned that denomination into a heretical one. Those that choose to debate or to have 'unity' with them are in grave danger with God. I say this having known someone in college that is a priest in the Episcopal Church. I have not had any contact with him since this happened but some of my friends have. They are skirting around the issue with him. I would not. You cannot play with denial of the faith. When you say that other paths leave to salvation when Christ Himself said that no one comes to the Father but by Him you are denying the faith.
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here