Updated 09:17 pm.EST, Fri November 20, 2009

Church|Mon, Apr. 07 2008 07:55 AM EDT

Unchurched Prefer Cathedrals Over Contemporary Church Buildings

By Audrey Barrick|Christian Post Reporter

Unchurched Americans prefer churches that look more like a medieval cathedral over contemporary church buildings, a new study showed.

Although billions of dollars have been spent on church buildings and more contemporary designs, church attendance has declined, said Jim Couchenour, director of marketing and ministry services for Cogun Inc., a founding member of Cornerstone Knowledge Network. The network was thus prompted to ask, "As church builders what can we do to help church leaders be more intentional about reaching people who don’t go to church?"

In a study conducted by LifeWay Research for Cornerstone Knowledge Network, the unchurched preferred more traditional looking buildings by a nearly 2-to-1 ratio over any other option. Given 100 "preference points" to allocate among four photos of church exteriors, the unchurched used an average of 47.7 points on the most traditional and Gothic options.

The other three options were given only 18.5 to 15.9 points.

"Quite honestly, this research surprised us," said Ed Stetzer, director of LifeWay Research and LifeWay Christian Resource’s missiologist in residence. "We expected they’d choose the more contemporary options, but they were clearly more drawn to the aesthetics of the Gothic building than the run-of-the-mill, modern church building."

Stetzer believes unchurched Americans may be drawn to the look of the Gothic cathedral because it speaks to a connectedness to the past.

Young unchurched people particularly preferred the traditional look. Those between the ages of 25 to 34 gave an average of 58.9 of their 100 preference points to the more Gothic church exterior while those over the age of 70 gave that option only an average of 32.9 points.

One survey respondent said modern churches "seem cold."

"I like the smell of candles burning, stained-glass windows, [and] an intimacy that’s transcendent," the respondent said.

"We may have been designing buildings based on what we think the unchurched would prefer," Couchenour noted. "While multi-use space is the most efficient, we need to ask, ‘Are there ways to dress up that big rectangular box in ways that would be more appealing to the unchurched?’"

Most churches that look like a cathedral, however, are in decline, Stetzer pointed out.

"Buildings don’t reach people, people do," Stetzer said. "But if churches are looking to build and are trying to reach the unchurched, they should take into consideration the kind of building. Costs and other considerations will play into the decision, but the preferences of the unchurched should be considered as well."

Survey results showed that more than half of the unchurched said the design of a church building would impact their enjoyment of a visit to church. Twenty-two percent said the design of the church would strongly impact their enjoyment of the visit and 32 percent indicated it would have some impact. More than a third said it would have no impact whatsoever on their visit.

The survey was conducted on 1,684 unchurched adults on Feb. 4 and 5. Unchurched people are defined as those who had not attended a church, mosque or synagogue in the past six months except for religious holidays or special events.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Fri Apr 18, 2008 3:40 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Perhaps, many just want the sense of continuity with past Christians. A feeling that Christians have been praying to God in the same place for centuries. We often forget that America is still a young country. In Europe, you can go to houses that have been lived in for centuries whereas our oldest buildings are often less than two hundred years old. In our ever increasing fast paced life, many may seek something that says God is here, has been here and will be here in the future. This may help anchor Christians who feel adrift in the tide, if it helps then more power to them.

  • Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:55 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    From the perspective of designing a building to reach the "unchurched" this is already a losing battle. You can't please all of the people all of the time. Tastes and preferences will radically change long before the building exceeds its useful life. This is a wasted effort.

    I agree that no one is saved by the type of building or great architecture.

  • Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:24 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    God wants us to be a temple worthy of His Spirit. Fancy building are nice. But God prefers obeidence more. Remember, Jesus was born in a stable and laid in a manager. God met Moses in a burning bush. God dwelled in a tent for over 40 years.

    As some one stated earlier: If cathedrals are what attract unbelievers, all of Europe would be saved.
    People can be drawn to fancy building where God word is not preached. Architecture is nice but God is not found there in. The Taj Mahal, St Basile Spasskaya Tower, Kaaba and Potala Palace are excellent examples of great architectural design. However, Jesus Christ is not preached in them correctly or at all.

  • Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:24 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    holito,

    I never suggested anything else. Of course we don't worship the building.

  • Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:02 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    There shall be no other God before Me.

  • Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:01 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Are you suggesting that we cannot have a Godly church and a building that honors the holiness of God?

    Not in the least, however, we are called by the good new not to a building. When we are the temple of the Holy Spirit, we should present ourselves holy and acceptable to God. God word can be preached in a store front church or a wonderous building. If you are drawn to the church first and not the word, you are coming already for a different reason. Your mind is not on serving God.

  • Wed Apr 09, 2008 2:53 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    holito,

    Are you suggesting that we cannot have a Godly church and a building that honors the holiness of God?

  • Wed Apr 09, 2008 1:54 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 1

    The first thing that came to mind when I read this???...
    2Ti 3:5 "Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof..."

    We're talking about folks who only want to "play church" every now and again.
    It's only natural that they would value form over function. It's the mantra of the relativistic culture that we are in, that regards symbolism over substance.

    ...and what's more It's the stepping stones of man-driven works-based salvation. " I put on my "Sunday best" and "give" God an hour of my time to show how "good" I am, I kneel and clasp my hands together in a traditional prayer pose, and think that there is some special super-godly magic that makes old unintelligible liturgies and lofty sounding choral music a better or more holy way to get to God - or so I think. Yep, I'm racking up points with the big man upstairs for doing this, even if it means nothing to me personally!"

    Not. Jesus will say unto these: "Depart from Me, I never knew you".

    Are you looking to "get right with God"? You're time would be better spent with a Bible and a few Christians who tuly love the Lord with all their heart, mind and soul, that could answer your questions and guide you in more humble surroundings.
    God isn't impressed by your candles and chanting and long prayers and big buildings.

    Psalm 51:17 "The sacrifice You (God) want is a broken spirit. A broken and repentant heart, O God, you will not despise."

  • Wed Apr 09, 2008 1:39 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Of course the church is people and that the building is not the church but I agree with Kevin. Why can't we have both?
    Because you can have a beautiful building with the devil as the sheppard or you can have a person filled with the Spirit preaching salvation.

  • Wed Apr 09, 2008 1:37 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Seriously people. This study is not about what attracts people to actually going to church; the study simply showed images of different architectural styles in order to determine which are deemed most attractive to people (and, by the way, a sample of 1000 is standard...if done on scientific randomness principles, it is accurate +/-3%).

    Lucifer was the most gorgeous angel in heaven. But He has not lead anyone to God. Please let me know where it is written we would be drawn to God based on a building?
    Faith comes by hearing hearing the word of God. Ever perceiving but not seeing and ever hearing and not understanding. God said: My people perish for a lack of knowledge.

  • Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:08 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    What we so easily forget is that the old gothic cathedrals were designed to draw the attention of the people toward heaven and the holiness of God. There were actually things in the architecture of those cathedrals which were intended to be viewed by God alone.

    Of course the church is people and that the building is not the church but I agree with Kevin. Why can't we have both?

  • Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:31 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Seriously people. This study is not about what attracts people to actually going to church; the study simply showed images of different architectural styles in order to determine which are deemed most attractive to people (and, by the way, a sample of 1000 is standard...if done on scientific randomness principles, it is accurate +/-3%).

    The study should be no surprise. Why on earth would someone prefer a warehouse to a gothic (or romanesque or baroque or spanish missional etc.) church. Why can't all these rich suburban evangelical churches make beautiful spaces to praise God? Yes, the heart of each believer is most important, but why either/or? We can go from the heart and move outward into creative endeavors, including architecture.

  • Wed Apr 09, 2008 9:06 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    If cathedrals are what attract unbelievers, all of Europe would be saved.

    Say it again: Building will not save us. We are suppose to be the temple of God. We should carry Him wherever we go.

  • Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:54 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    I have a few observations. Although I spent much time in Europe and LOVE the cathedrals and "old style" buildings, I do not feel this makes as much of a difference as we think. I do not feel the research has been extensive enough. First of all, where did these 1,000 something "subjects" come from? Where they from many different areas or just one city? Also, there is a much broader and more detailed study(s) showing that the movement is going the way of house churches and small groups. The Cooperate woship with thousands is still yearned for but the environment of a smaller "house" church is the driving force...especially in the culture shift today. I do not know the age of who has done the research but I am in my twenties and consistently around college and grad students. They are not seeking buildings but are seeking smaller groups that have a driving force and purpose. They want authenticity and purpose. Asceticism and commitment. There are many, many others who also have found this. I do not want to bash this post as I see how that might be observed but the research was not carried out very well or "professionally" in my opinion. I look forward to this being researched more and learning of the outcome! Keep on keepin' on warriors!

  • Tue Apr 08, 2008 9:38 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    So....does this mean we all need to go out and build cathedrals, now??? C'mon. The unchurched!!! Hah!!!!

    The fact is, many of the cathedrals are cold buildings!!! The unchurched don't have a clue!!!!

  • Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:28 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Brother Pablo

    Very nicely put and in more detail than I chose to do, but I agree with you completely!! May God bless you and your congregation, as it seems that your church body are doing the work that our Lord Jesus Christ intended and directed us to do. As you also put, we must also live the life that we are preaching to others. I send out prayers to you and all others who read this that God continues to give you strength and encouragement in this difficult time in the world to do His Will, His Way only.

  • Tue Apr 08, 2008 4:43 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    There are some very good responses from all of you!

    You could draw people into a dump or a rat hole if they saw a reason to be there. We are trying to attract people into church (the building) by telling them to come hear about the "Love of God", Repentance and Salvation yet what they see is the church (the Body / people) in disagreement, hating one another, disharmony, disunity, condemnation, unforgiveness, rules, regulations, religion, hypocrisy, jealousy, envy and the list goes on and on.

    The true "product" will sell itself to those seeking no matter what wrapper you put it in. The problem is, most of what is being offered to people is a watered down, "our version" of the true Gospel. We live one life and preach another. People need three things, 1 Cor 13:13 "And now these three remain: faith, hope and love. But the greatest of these is love." (NIV)

    If we are not living the truth, it's going to be hard to sell the truth even if it's in the biggest, prettiest, nicest, cathedralist, modernist, contemporaryist, (I'm just making up words now!)whatever building in the world.

    My church is usually on the streets, in the back alleys and outside of bars trying to reach the lost. We don't attract them into a church building, we go into hell and drag them back out. Once we find them, they are welcome to come to our humble building with plastic chairs, a welcome sign and open arms. They show up barefoot, torn clothes and smelly and they sit right next to the dear brothers and sisters in their Sunday best who love them and we have church.

    If the Gospel we are preaching "requires" big fancy buildings, light shows, book stores, coffee bars, 30 piece praise bands and 100 members choirs, multiple locations, valet parking and internet hookup to sell it, then maybe we are delivering the wrong message. Please don't misunderstand, there is nothing wrong with those things, but we need to watch that they don't take center stage to the basic message.

    The Apostle Paul spoke of his ministry in Acts 26:20 "....I preached that they should repent and turn to God and prove their repentance by their deeds." (NIV)

    Paul didn't come with fanfare, he came with a message, a message of faith, hope and love. 1 Cor 2:2-5 "For I resolved to know nothing while I was with you except Jesus Christ and him crucified. I came to you in weakness and fear, and with much trembling. My message and my preaching were not with wise and persuasive words, but with a demonstration of the Spirit's power, so that your faith might not rest on men's wisdom, but on God's power. (NIV)

    I don't want a pretty building, I want a group of the Body of Christ that has the power of God on them.

    Pablo

  • JHS »
    Tue Apr 08, 2008 3:03 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    I think that cathedral looking churches are less inviting that modern etc, interesting study, beside it's the poeple that make the church, no the building.

  • Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:09 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Well, once again, the focus has become the building as to what will draw the unchurched into the church. I understand that individuals must feel welcome in the church, but that feeling should come from the Body of the church, that being the members. Like many of you I am sure, you have visited various styles of churchs, some of which you felt welcome and others you maybe didn't as much. The reality is, what should draw the unchurched into the church SHOULD BE those people that make up the church. Remember, as our Scriptures teach us, what makes a church is the people, not a building. Who cares what the building looks like, if your church isn't reaching out to the lost and helping others to find Jesus Christ, then it isn't a church at all. May God bless all of you and remember that we are instructed by the Scriptures to go out, not just sit in a building. May the Lord bless each of you in all you do.
    Doing His Will, His Way!

  • Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:31 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    Well, guess Bill Hybels and Rick Warren will be starting up a new building fund to change their church structures. Christianity via vox pop.

  • Tue Apr 08, 2008 2:49 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    I think we need to be concerned about what hell looks like for the un-churched and not
    what buildings they like to look out from the outside.

  • Tue Apr 08, 2008 1:13 am Agree: 6   Disagree: 0

    My, oh my
    This looks like a travel brochure questionnaire, which do you prefer a Jacuzzi party with Tahitian bongo band playing in the background or the trance Berlin nightlife background.
    This is about the Calling and not tourist attraction.

    A church is a large association of people with a common set of deep beliefs in the Lord Jesus Christ, NOT the building.

    Although, I agree that if churches are looking to build and are trying to reach the unchurched, they should take into consideration the kind of building.
    Costs and other considerations will play into the decision, but the preferences of the unchurched should be considered as well.

    Choice is there for the unchurched. The calling to worship needs to come from the Spirit of the Lord and not the advertisement on the pavement outside or the architectures of the building.
    Like the Lord said the in the good Book, the Spirit of the Lord is the one guiding us into worshipping God.
    If it is up to our preference, then most would choose to slumber away or watch the ball game on television.

  • Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:19 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    If cathedrals are what attract unbelievers, all of Europe would be saved.

  • Mon Apr 07, 2008 11:23 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Uh...Sorry, but you shouldn't really get too excited over this story because it doesn't confirm some yearning of the unchurched to return to "tradition and truth."

    The definition of an "unchurched" person used for the survey did not ask if the person was actually looking for a church now, or had any intention of joining a church. These are mostly people who are quite content to only attend church for Christmas and Easter, and would really like it to be in a "churchy" atmosphere. If asked further, they would probably express a preference for the sermon to not include anything about certain sins they hold dear, or any reference to eternal judgment. To pay attention to this survey is to let the inmates run the asylum.

    Also, the reporter fails to include any opinion from someone in favor of modern buildings. Couchenour is wrong that modern buildings are built the way they are because they are trying to attract the unchurched. Some are, but for others it involves a theological decision that the "church" is the people, and that the building is just where the people meet and should not be any different from other buildings. "Slickness" and marketing have nothing to do with it, and we really should stop judging the motivations of our brothers and sisters who prefer contemporary churches in this way.

  • Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:07 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    I think this just proves how hungry people are becoming for tradition and truth. They are getting (little by little) sick of slick. The "ancient modern" movement shows that also within the church. Some are realizing we threw the baby out with the bathwater since the reformation. Not all tradition is bad, and this study shows a hunger for it. Having read a lot of Ed Stetzer's work, I know this really rocked his world!

    I do have one question- I would really like to see the pictures they used. Were there cute little white churches (circa early 20th century), and what ere their scores?

  • Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:03 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 0

    If Christian services are inspired by the Holy Spirit and involve prayer, worship and Holy Scriptures, the blessing of gathering for service to God is receive in modest to grand buildings. What matters is the presence of the Holy Spirit, who blesses us. The nicer the building the better, but it doesn't make the service. My the Holy Spirit be our guide.

    Hope Page: http://itsallaboutjesusnotme.blogspot.com

  • Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:57 am Agree: 8   Disagree: 2

    It's like modern worship services. Now there are stories about how the unchurched and "seekers" that are coming into all these megachurches, or the "emerging church" movements, are reaching back to the original church and adding all sorts of sacramental, liturgical, orthodox things to their worship. Turns out that the current generation wants something timeless and sacred, and they are seeking orthodoxy, tradition, sacraments, and liturgical worship.

    People want someplace that reminds them why they are there, the same as in their desire for ancient liturgy in worship, whether it be Catholic, Orthodox, Lutheran or Anglican - they want something that reminds them that where they are, and what they are doing, is sacred - outside of time and place - something that reaches into the past and connects them with the Christians of the past.

  • Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:30 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Interesting...

    So after investing billions of dollars in state-of-the-art buildings and making every effort to not look like a church in order to appeal to the unchurched we now learn that the unchurched want a building that looks like a church.

    This is the problem with trying to appeal to people's tastes. These things change rapidly. The article is right about the fact that it is not the building that reaches people. However, it does say a lot about the priorities of those who built it.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Also on CP
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Church
  • Gifts
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Bethany House Publishers

It was a balmy California evening. I had gone for a jog before I was to speak at a leadership conference. I still can't recall how I got there, but I found myself sitting on a curb

Featured Advertiser Links