Advanced Search

Evangelicals Set Record Straight on Image Problem

By
Christian Post Reporter
Thu, May. 08 2008 08:04 PM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

WASHINGTON – Evangelicals have a serious image problem and need to reform their ways by getting back to the historic meaning of their identity, declared prominent leaders of the movement on Wednesday.

Enlarge this Image
os guinness
(Photo: The Christian Post)
Os Guinness, a highly respected evangelical scholar and a drafter of the 'Evangelical Manifesto' at the launch event of the document on Wednesday, May 7, 2008 in Washington, D.C.

In a call to action, representatives of “An Evangelical Manifesto” complained that the term “evangelical” has become too political, watered-down, or distorted in other ways. They urged those who identify themselves as evangelical to support the grassroots effort to restore the original meaning of the term.

“When you have best-selling authors that appear on public television with feel-good gospel who have to apologize to their own churches that they diluted the faith when they get home, something is profoundly wrong,” said Os Guinness, a highly respected evangelical scholar and a drafter of the document.

“When you have evangelical leaders who make predictions in the name of God which by biblical standards are openly false prophesies, something is badly wrong,” he continued. “When scholars and writers can look at the evangelical political movement and describe them as theocrats, or worse as fascists, something is badly wrong.”

Fellow drafter the Rev. Dr. John Huffman, pastor of St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church – a megachurch in Pasadena, Calif. – confirmed to The Christian Post that the controversy surrounding prosperity gospel preachers was one of many concerns for the manifesto’s drafters. Huffman pointed to the life of Jesus Christ, who he said went to the cross and died for mankind’s sin, as the Gospel.

God does promise blessings to his followers, but it is different than “consumerism material blessing,” Huffman stated.

Representatives of the manifesto said they started working on the statement three years ago after several members expressed frustration with the confusion in and outside of the church about who an evangelical is.

Several panel members on Wednesday said people they talked to were embarrassed to describe themselves as an evangelical because of the negative stereotypes associated with the term.

Polls, they say, show evangelicals as hypocrites, legalistic, judgmental, anti-intellectual, and out to impose their views on others, among other negative perceptions.

But the root meaning of the term evangelical came from the Greek word evangelion or good news.

Thus, supporters of “An Evangelical Manifesto” maintain that the original and true definition of evangelicals is Christians who define themselves, their faith, and their lives according to the good news of Jesus of Nazareth.

Evangelicals should unswervingly affirm their conviction in Jesus Christ and His teachings and engage in the public square, but do so with gentleness and civility, they stressed.

David Neff, editor-in-chief of Christianity Today magazine, further called on secular media to understand where evangelicals are coming from when they advocate for a certain policy.

“If we advocate for the earth, it is because God loves the earth,” Neff said. “If we advocate for refugees it is because Jesus himself was a refugee. If we advocate for children it is because Jesus welcomes children, and so on.”

More than 70 theologians, pastors and others have signed the Evangelical Manifesto, including Leith Anderson, president of the National Association of Evangelicals; Joel C. Hunter of Northland – A Church Distributed in Longwood, Fla.; Dr. Duane Litfin, president of Wheaton College; and Rich Stearns, president of World Vision U.S.

“I know I speak for our many colleagues outside of the U.S. and say we are deeply grateful for this ‘gift’ to the global church,” said the Rev. Dr. Geoff Tunnicliffe, international director/CEO of the World Evangelical Alliance, referring to the manifesto, to The Christian Post.

“As we are all acutely aware, so often global evangelicalism has been defined by a narrow segment of U.S. evangelicalism through the eyes of CNN,” he said. “This manifesto will be a great help in breaking down this stereotype. I will make sure this is communicated to all of our members around the world,” he vowed.

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
scitsonga
  • Sun May 11, 2008 9:36 pm
  • : 0
  • : 2
  • Flag
As an agnostic, the problem I have with evangelicals is they attempt to force their beliefs on those with different view points and are not shy about telling others they have the wrong beliefs- "your religion is wrong, mine is correct" I tend to be skeptical of all religions.
trb01
  • Sun May 11, 2008 8:56 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Here's the rub ... the entire treatise, as true as it is, is nothing more than a social-theological commentary on the desire to achieve appropriate Biblically based Christian behavior personally, interpersonally, and socially.

There is NO mention in either the Manifesto or the Study Guide of what the Bible says about:

... where faith in Christ comes from (Ro 10:17; Eph 2:8-9)
... the cost of discipleship (2Co 5:15; Mt 16:24)
... the expectations of the fruit of the spirit in changing personal behavior as expressed as the process of sanctification (2 Pe 1:5-12)
... that all of the law is found in loving God and your neighbor (De 6:5; Lev 19:18; Mt 22:39-40)
.... the definitions of loving God and neighbor (Jn 4:24; Mt 25:34-46; Mt 5:43-47; Lk 10:36-37; cf. Ja 1:22; Ro 2:13; Mt 7:12)
... the personal relationship that Christ expects (Mt 12:50; Jn 14:15, 21, 15:15; Ga 4:15)
... and the several expressions of spiritual disciplines that help Christians spend time with Christ in order to build a relationship with Him (confess faith in Christ: Ro 10:9-10 (is important in order for Christ to repair and restore relationship to God); confess sins: 1Jn 1:8-10; repent of sins: Lk 15:7 (these steps are important daily to restore communication with God - Jn 9:31; Ps 66:18; Pr 15:29); participating in a one-time baptism: Mat 28:19-20; participating in the Lord's Supper: 1Co 11:24-26; prayer: Php 4:6; reading the Bible: De 17:19; studying the Bible: Deu 6:6-7; 2Ti 2:15; thanksgiving and praise: Ps 100:4; worship: Jn 4:23-24; tithe: Lk 11:42; give alms (additional gifts beyond the tithe): Lk 12:33-34; personal sacrifice for the sake of advancing the Kingdom of God: 2Co 5:15; serving others: 1Pe 4:10; fasting: Mat 6:16-18.

And that is really and truly the point. In order to achieve what the manifesto wants, every Christian in the world has to understand and personally incorporate in the expression of his or her own personal, interpersonal, and social life, every word of the referenced scriptures. Sadly, the manifesto doesn't do anything more than infer this, and certainly doesn't point out where to find the answer to their question.
trb01
  • Sun May 11, 2008 8:55 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Here's the rub ... the entire treatise, as true as it is, is nothing more than a social-theological commentary on the desire to achieve appropriate Biblically based Christian behavior personally, interpersonally, and socially.

There is NO mention in either the Manifesto or the Study Guide of what the Bible says about:

... where faith in Christ comes from (Ro 10:17; Eph 2:8-9)
... the cost of discipleship (2Co 5:15; Mt 16:24)
... the expectations of the fruit of the spirit in changing personal behavior as expressed as the process of sanctification (2 Pe 1:5-12)
... that all of the law is found in loving God and your neighbor (De 6:5; Lev 19:18; Mt 22:39-40)
.... the definitions of loving God and neighbor (Jn 4:24; Mt 25:34-46; Mt 5:43-47; Lk 10:36-37; cf. Ja 1:22; Ro 2:13; Mt 7:12)
... the personal relationship that Christ expects (Mt 12:50; Jn 14:15, 21, 15:15; Ga 4:15)
... and the several expressions of spiritual disciplines that help Christians spend time with Christ in order to build a relationship with Him (confess faith in Christ: Ro 10:9-10 (is important in order for Christ to repair and restore relationship to God); confess sins: 1Jn 1:8-10; repent of sins: Lk 15:7 (these steps are important daily to restore communication with God - Jn 9:31; Ps 66:18; Pr 15:29); participating in a one-time baptism: Mat 28:19-20; participating in the Lord's Supper: 1Co 11:24-26; prayer: Php 4:6; reading the Bible: De 17:19; studying the Bible: Deu 6:6-7; 2Ti 2:15; thanksgiving and praise: Ps 100:4; worship: Jn 4:23-24; tithe: Lk 11:42; give alms (additional gifts beyond the tithe): Lk 12:33-34; personal sacrifice for the sake of advancing the Kingdom of God: 2Co 5:15; serving others: 1Pe 4:10; fasting: Mat 6:16-18.

And that is really and truly the point. In order to achieve what the manifesto wants, every Christian in the world has to understand and personally incorporate in the expression of his or her own personal, interpersonal, and social life, every word of the referenced scriptures. Sadly, the manifesto doesn't do anything more than infer this, and certainly doesn't point out where to find the answer to their question.
timothybrown01
  • Sat May 10, 2008 11:46 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
I am of the opinion that this group may have done themselves and people who call themselves "Evangelicals" a disservice by titling their document a "manifesto". Though the document presents a view of Christianity that is less "politicized", the word it self denotes a political doctrine. The American Heritage Dictionary defines manifesto as "A public declaration of principles, policies, or intentions, especially of a political nature." Though other dictionaries do not include references to a political aspect to the word, many people still have negative connotations of the word (Communist Manifest, unibomber manifest, etc..)
wrhalver
  • Sat May 10, 2008 4:59 am
  • : 1
  • : 2
  • Flag
msnchris70
I could not have said it better.

reg599
I agree that Christians need to learn how to handle persecution better.
But we need to recognize the difference between persecution and constructive criticism.

Persecution works against truth while constructive criticism attempts to rebuild truth.
This article is about rebuilding truth. We would not expect the secular world to be critical.
reg599
  • Fri May 09, 2008 4:53 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Guys: I don't think the problem is with our image as much as it is with our unwillingness to accept persecution as fact of faith.

Luk 6:22 Blessed are ye, when men shall hate you, and when they shall separate you from their company, and shall reproach you, and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of man's sake.
msnchris70
  • Fri May 09, 2008 12:16 pm
  • : 3
  • : 5
  • Flag
Who needs an Apostles CREED????? Are you kidding me! We need an apostles creed because it is the base of what we Christians believe, without such a creed Mormons and Jehovah Witnesses, Unitarians and Christian Scientists would be considered Christians.

Because of the Creed, we know they are not true Christians. Today's non-denominational Evangelicals scare the you the what out of me. They have no creed to protect the faith and have watered it down to become a "Mission Statement". They have no Liturgy as the early Christians did, they don't believe the bread and wine become Jesus body and blood, they think Baptism is only symbolic and they have turned worship of God on Sunday into mere entertainment and a Bible study with a motivational speaker.

Without the Apostles CREED can you not see the Slippery slope of watered down Christianity?
song2vs4
  • Fri May 09, 2008 10:57 am
  • : 3
  • : 0
  • Flag
Why do we need the Apostles Creed when we have the Word of God, which contains the great commission?
FullGospel
  • Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 am
  • : 1
  • : 3
  • Flag
And, calling attention to the obvious...

A few years before this (c. 390), the letter addressed to Pope Siricius by the Council of Milan (Migne, P.L., XVI, 1213) supplies the earliest known instance of the combination Symbolum Apostolorum ("Creed of the Apostles") in these striking words: "If you credit not the teachings of the priests . . . let credit at least be given to the Symbol of the Apostles which the Roman Church always preserves and maintains inviolate."

With the last paragraph being...

I believe in the Holy Ghost, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and life everlasting.

Echoed in 110 A.D. in the first city the Christians were called Christians by Ignatius of Antioch, who followed St. Peter and Evodius as the third Bishop of Antioch, and served just after the time Matthew wrote his Gospel there:

Letter to the Smyrneans [-]

See that ye all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father, and the presbytery as ye would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is [administered] either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church.

Pretty straightforward if you ask me.
wrhalver
  • Fri May 09, 2008 4:09 am
  • : 2
  • : 2
  • Flag
"Huffman pointed to the life of Jesus Christ, who he said went to the cross and died for mankind’s sin, as the Gospel."

This is truly refreshing to hear.
But I would like to point out to Pastor Huffman that we already have the Apostles Creed. Why do we need another document?
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here