Updated 12:47 pm.EST, Sun November 22, 2009

Education|Sun, May. 24 2009 10:22 AM EDT

Students Protest Removal of Religious Graduation Speakers

By Eric Young|Christian Post Reporter

Students at Pace High School in Florida are protesting the removal of two fellow classmates who were barred from speaking at their own graduation ceremony due fears of prosecution.

Earlier this month, a federal judge made public a consent decree requiring school officials in Florida’s Santa Rosa County to stop promoting their personal religious beliefs in public schools following complaints filed on behalf of two students.

"Religious freedom is best promoted when the government stays out of religion,” said Benjamin Stevenson, an ACLU of Florida staff attorney based in Pensacola who led the case.

“Now, students and their families can feel comfortable holding and expressing their own religious beliefs, knowing that school officials will no longer impose their particular religious beliefs on students at school. This is a truly victorious day for the Constitution and for religious freedom in Florida," he added.

As a result of the decree, however, two students who were expected to speak at their graduation ceremony were reportedly removed from the lineup out of what the nearby Pace Assembly Ministries believes is concern that they would refer to their personal religious beliefs during their speeches.

“Our student body and senior class presidents have been cut from speaking at our graduation,” Carson Howton, a senior at Pace High, told the local Pensacola News Journal.

“It’s been a tradition at our school for student leaders to speak,” he said.

According to Superintendent Tim Wyrosdick, the two student speakers were removed as the result of new guidelines developed that limit student speakers to valedictory addresses and salutatory addresses.

“We need to be legally sound and heed to maintaining good, solid procedures that will avoid any violations of the law, and we need to remain within the law,” he told the News Journal.

But critics of the move say such fears of violations are unfounded as the judge’s orders focused on the actions of school officials and not students - even students serving as leaders of the student body.

“In a document entitled, ‘Guidance on Constitutionally Protected Prayer in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools,’ the DOE (U.S. Department of Education) has issued guidelines to schools that reinforce the Supreme Court decisions protecting the rights of students in schools,” notes Jay Sekulow, chief counsel for the American Center for Law and Justice, in a statement on the rights of students.

According to the guidelines, school officials may not mandate or organize prayer at graduation or select speakers for such events in a manner that favors religious speech such as prayer.

However, where students or other private graduation speakers are “selected on the basis of genuinely neutral, evenhanded criteria and retain primary control over the content of their expression,” that expression is not attributable to the school and therefore may not be restricted because of its religious (or anti-religious) content.

“To avoid any mistaken perception that a school endorses student or other private speech that is not in fact attributable to the school, school officials may make appropriate, neutral disclaimers to clarify that such speech (whether religious or nonreligious) is the speaker's and not the school's,” the guidelines advise.

In protest of the removal of the two student speakers, students have organized a prayer walk, set for 8 a.m. Monday at Pace High School.

A “Students Rights Rally” has also been organized for Tuesday evening at Pace Assembly of God Church.

Organizers say the rally is an effort to show support for the graduating students of Pace High School, the principal, faculty, and staff.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:12 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    When I spoke of the college professor in the post below, I was referring to the one who gave his "last lecture" because he knew he was going to die. And he went around promoting his world view of how others should live their lives. Isn't that a belief? Isn't that forcing it on others? What's the difference? If I heard a message like that, I don't see how it would be any more or less offensive than someone who's christian speaking on how they feel people should be motivated to live out their lives...

  • Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:08 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I thought this article was about their speeches, not about them praying. I don't see anything wrong with them speaking at their own graduation. I remember when there was that college professor who...i think spoke at graduation (I could be wrong). But it doesn't matter, because every motivational speaker who speaks pushes their own beliefs on how people should live their lives on EVERY single listener in there anyway. I for one would rather hear something that's motivated from what Christ has done in someone's life, rather than the selfish ambitions from a worldly perspective of get yours, live up life, and then you die anywayzzz.

    Besides, doesn't any Christian follow Matthew 28:17-20?? ;)

  • Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:32 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "Who is the aclu coward who keeps flagging those who wish to defend the freedom of speech in our country??"

    CPSteinmetz is the one(99% certain)


    So I guess that means hes also pro-KKK and pro-terrorist as well.

  • Mon Aug 10, 2009 5:22 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    As I see it, if the godless can pay for infanticide with my taxpayer dollars; then these men can pray in Jesus' name with theirs.

  • Tue May 26, 2009 1:04 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 8

    mickeyc, I can't believe you're giving my flagged as inappropriate posts thumbs-down, you're a trip!!!

  • Mon May 25, 2009 7:16 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 6

    aveteran, would you have a problem with a student giving credit to those who helped them in their academic achievements, those who encouraged and believed in them. I don't think you would, so why are you opposed to Christian students who want to publically thank God for encouraging and believing in them. I doubt if you would hear them pray, "please help these heathens to see their sins and get right with You so they won't have to go to hell", now that's a prayer I would be opposed to.

  • Mon May 25, 2009 6:27 pm Agree: 7   Disagree: 3

    Flagged as inappropriate. show believer, what do you consider proselytizing prayers at graduations, etc.? PRAYING TO BE SEEN. Anyone can pray silently and sincerely at any time; doing it in front of a captive audience is PRAYING TO BE SEEN. Prayer is NOT a team sport. hide

  • Mon May 25, 2009 5:01 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 5

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Who is the aclu coward who keeps flagging those who wish to defend the freedom of speech in our country?? hide

  • Mon May 25, 2009 5:00 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 2

    aveteran, yes, many Christians abide by Matthew 6:5-6 but this passage does not forbid public prayer, Christ was speaking to those who were praying to be seen and heard of others as opposed to being heard by God.

  • Mon May 25, 2009 3:53 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 3

    Flagged as inappropriate. show The available news stories lack any information about the students involved. Are they known for aggressive proselytizing, or are they respectful of the beliefs of others? Considering the protests of the local AoG church, I have my suspicions. The school officials likely chose to have the graduation remain a dignified event respectful of all faiths, rather than devolve into an offensive, circus-tent revival. Without knowing the intentions of the students, we can't be certain either way. I would like to know, though: Do any Christians actually obey the instructions given in Matthew 6:5-6? hide

  • Mon May 25, 2009 3:17 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 2

    Flagged as inappropriate. show I guess the aclu didn't like what I said, but what I said to CP Steinmetz was so much for freedom of speech and thanks for showing the aclu for what they really are!! hide

  • Mon May 25, 2009 2:04 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    Flagged as inappropriate. show cp, so much for freedom of speech!! Thanks for showing the aclu for what they really are!!! hide

  • Mon May 25, 2009 11:17 am Agree: 7   Disagree: 7

    Graduation should be celebrating education, not faith. Speeches should be about educational attainment, not religious belief.

    Go ACLU.

  • Mon May 25, 2009 11:15 am Agree: 6   Disagree: 5

    Graduation should be celebrating education, not faith. Speeches should be about educational attainment, not religious belief.

    Go ACLU.

  • Mon May 25, 2009 10:38 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 4

    Flagged as inappropriate. show "The most interesting thing about this news item is that they blocked these speakers merely on the possibility that they might say something religious." Christianity is how we Christians live our lives. It is who we are as individuals. Therefore, ANY statement made concerning how to live your life either supports or undermines our religious beliefs. So, that really doesn't leave much room to say anything about the graduates future without entering the area of "Christian religion". In fact, even an athiest, humanist or anyone else commenting on how to live your life would enter the world of the "Christian religion". How little the ACLU understands about Christianity. It will only take a case by a Christian for discrimination for letting others talk against their faith at graduation to end all speeches. This would violate "Free Speech". So, you can't hold to the ACLU's position without being against "Free Speech". Students EARN the right to make that speech and that speech is to be from their hearts. The ACLU and the court has made "case law" which forbids the free exercise of those students religious beliefs. Some dare call it treason. I do. hide

  • Mon May 25, 2009 8:45 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    The most interesting thing about this news item is that they blocked these speakers merely on the possibility that they might say something religious. Why were these students excluded and not the valedictorian? How do we know that the valedictorian will not say something religious? How do we know that a school official won't say something religious? This all seems way too censorial to me.

  • Mon May 25, 2009 2:53 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    -But critics of the move say such fears of violations are unfounded as the judgeâ

  • Sun May 24, 2009 10:23 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 3

    DP,
    You brought the hammer smack-dab on the nail's head! If a government is to best promote the religious freedom of its citizenry, it has to stay neutral, or at least realize that it has allowed for freedom of expression as well as religious rights, and pony up.
    Sometimes I think it is done to promote the idea that Christians are morons. Heaven help us if valedictorian or salutatorian types are capable of Christian faith.
    Best regards and keep up the good fight of faith. I'll throw in a thumb's up for you if that would help.

  • Sun May 24, 2009 9:52 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 3

    Flagged as inappropriate. show The ACLU has been trying to bury our Saviour for years. Thats' why I send $$$ to the ACLJ who keeps fighting them in court. Go Jesus. hide

  • Sun May 24, 2009 7:32 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 4

    "Religious freedom is best promoted when the government stays out of religion," said Benjamin Stevenson, an ACLU of Florida staff attorney based in Pensacola who led the case.

    So, let me get this straight. Government stayed out if religion by the ACLU bringing a matter which may have contained a religion to the government and had government make a ruling concerning religion.... Does that just about sum it up? OXYMORON!!!!

  • Sun May 24, 2009 2:22 pm Agree: 8   Disagree: 6

    How ironic this event would occur at the very time in our country we pay our respect to those men and women who paid the ultimate price for one of the very freedoms these students are being denied the right to express and enjoy!!

  • Sun May 24, 2009 12:56 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. show I am convinced that this sort of thing would be far less of an issue , were it not for the fact that the religious right , when given an inch will immediately grab a couple of miles. hide

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • DVD
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links