Updated 11:59 pm.EST, Fri November 20, 2009

Society|Thu, May. 28 2009 05:10 PM EDT

Theistic Evolutionist Francis Collins Eyed to Lead NIH

By Aaron J. Leichman|Christian Post Reporter

Physician-geneticist Francis S. Collins, who successfully led efforts to map the human genetic code, is the top choice for the National Institutes of Health (NIH)’s next director, according to a source familiar with the selection process.

Screening for Collins is nearly complete and President Obama may announce his nomination as early as this week, the source reportedly told Bloomberg News, which broke the story.

Should he be tapped for the spot, Collins would be faced with calls to boost spending on cancer research and free science from politics as well as financial conflicts of interest.

As an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the NIH serves as the steward of medical and behavioral research for the country, providing leadership and direction to programs designed to improve the health of the nation by conducting and supporting research.

Currently, Raynard S. Kington is serving as the NIH acting director after Elias A. Zerhouni, former President Bush’s pick in 2002, stepped down at the end of October 2008.

Though neither Collins nor the White House have commented on the leak, those familiar with Collins’ work have hailed his candidacy.

Aside from his landmark discoveries of disease genes and his leadership of the Human Genome Project, Collins is known for his consistent emphasis on the importance of ethical and legal issues in genetics. He has been elected to the Institute of Medicine and the National Academy of Sciences, and was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom – the highest civilian honor given by the President – in November 2007.

Collins is also founder of the BiosLogos Foundation, which addresses the escalating culture war between science and faith in the United States.

As a Christian, Collins is a theist evolutionist – someone who believes classical religious teachings about God are compatible with the modern scientific understanding about biological evolution.

His 2006 book, The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief, spent 20 weeks on the New York Times bestsellers list and explained how he found harmony between the scientific and spiritual worldviews.

In the book, Collins also defended research on existing embryonic stem cells, though he has expressed opposition to purposely creating them for research.

Collins was present during the signing of an Executive Order by President Obama that reversed the government's ban on funding stem-cell research back in March.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Sat May 30, 2009 8:08 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    I have read his Language of God, and, while I don't accept his argument 100%, I find him a refreshingly thoughtful scientist and not given to using science as a political vehicle to promote causes. I understand his concern over this and grant that his ethics make him an ideal candidate for NIH.
    Science after all is discovery and its implimentation should work for the benefit of humanity. I believe from reading his book that is what drives Dr. Collins. I can respect that.

  • Fri May 29, 2009 8:24 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Dr Collins seems like a good choice to me. I'm not sure he would characterize himself as a "theistic evolutionist" but I think we all get the point. He understands the facts of evolution and has no problems reconciling his faith to it.

  • Fri May 29, 2009 1:41 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Collins can reconcile God as creator with evolution which he believes is clearly the biological road map all life has followed.
    He is a scientist with complete faith in the theory and a Christian who can see the hand of God in evolution.

    ID is creationism in a new suit. It has no scientific basis. It's primarily a tool to promote creationism by disguising it as some psuedo-science so it can be taught in schools. ID proponents would like it to carry the same scholastic validity that evolution does. Luckily, it's been rejected almost universally.

  • Fri May 29, 2009 1:10 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. show No similarity - Collins is a complete evolutionist with acceptance of other parts of theology. hide

  • Fri May 29, 2009 9:23 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Isn't Theistic Evolution the same thing as Intelligent Design?

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links