Updated 12:47 pm.EST, Sun November 22, 2009

Society|Sat, Oct. 17 2009 12:05 PM EDT

Media Violence Fast Targets Anti-Immigrant Speech

By Nathan Black|Christian Post Reporter

Religious groups are urging Americans to take a stand against violence in media, particularly hate speech against immigrants, by taking part in a weeklong media fast.

Participants in the 2009 Media Violence Fast, now in its third year, are being asked to reflect on the possible correlation between hate speech – which includes false or exaggerated facts, arguments rooted in hidden assumptions, "us vs. them" language, and dehumanizing metaphors – and violent crimes.

At the same time that participants are being urged to avoid watching violence in media, they are also being challenged to listen to some of the worst anti-immigrant speech in order to "marshal" their moral outrage and action.

"There are a lot of shows on television and other media that depict violence as an acceptable and logical solution to serious challenges," said the Rev. Dr. Michael Kinnamon, general secretary of the National Council of Churches, in a statement. "In fact, violence is almost never the answer to problems. Jesus made this clear in the Sermon on the Mount, and prophets and religious leaders across the centuries have echoed the message."

Each year, the So We Might See Coalition, an interfaith group that seeks media justice, selects a theme for the fast to provide a topic of meditation and social action. This year they have chosen to support the National Hispanic Media Coalition’s efforts to increase the public's awareness about hate speech in the national media.

Organizers say the anti-immigrant hate speech seen on television and the Internet, heard on radio, and read in print "employs flawed arguments to appeal to fears rather than facts."

"The presence of hate speech so widely in media creates a climate that makes it impossible to have reasonable policy discussions on issues like immigration reform, and cultivates a climate that condones violence against targeted groups," the coalition contends.

As part of the Oct. 19-26 Media Violence Fast, the coalition is also collecting signatures for a petition that asks the Federal Communications Commission to open a notice of inquiry into hate speech in the media and update a government report that collects statistics and information about the connection between hate speech and hate crimes.

"Immigrant, minority, and religious populations are often targets of hate speech before they are subsequently the target of physical hate crimes," the petition states. "For example, in June 2006 four teenagers posed as federal agents and asked two Mexican men for their green cards. The teenagers then beat and robbed the two men, while accusing them of stealing jobs from U.S. citizens. This incident occurred after radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh called Mexican immigrants, regardless of legal status, 'a renegade, potential crime element that is unwilling to work.'"

The petition further notes that hate crimes against Hispanics have been increasing over the last four years while such violence against all other groups has been holding steady or attenuating.

A Pew Research Center survey, released last week, revealed that more than half of Americans (52 percent) believe Hispanics face a lot of discrimination. An even higher percentage of the public (58 percent) perceive more discrimination against Muslims.

The coalition is encouraging participants in this year's fast to also learn about Islamophobia to ensure there is less hate directed against Muslim immigrants.

Cheryl A. Leanza, a media attorney who serves as policy director with the United Church of Christ’s Office of Communications, Inc., made clear that the interfaith coalition does not support censorship but is asking the federal government to track the impact of anti-immigrant speech on physical violence.

"Hate speech in the media is a growing problem that must be examined before it can be solved," Leanza said in a statement.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:12 pm Agree: 12   Disagree: 6

    Our culture seems to be using this mantra of "hate speech" to silence any opposition to it . . . Freedom of speech guarantees two opposing parties the same platform to express their thoughts without retaliation; is this a call for greater understanding or are we gradually listening to the faint echoes of an old foe named totalitarianism?

  • Sat Oct 17, 2009 9:57 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 5

    We have neo-nazi groups and other white supremacists in Arizona going after immigrants. Check what the Bible says about treating the stranger among you. The Bible, where we learn to lover our neighbor as ourselves, and give our excess clothing to those who have none. Jesus,in one story fled to Egypt. Good thing there was no border patrol. I know a Mexican American pastor(legal) who was regularly beaten in school in south Texas for speaking Spanish in the nineteen fifties. He and his wife were afraid to let their children be bi-lingual. Race is central to this debate.

    All those new immigrants should come the way our first citizens arrived, with guns and a willingness to deprive the native residents of the choice land with a few beads and a lot of bullets in return. And since wee broke every treaty(they have the force of the Constitution supposedly)ever ratified, we set a law abiding example for the new arrivals. Come and take what you can. If the Hispanics ever fully realize their voting power, you guys are in for a surprise equal to the one received by those guys who welcomed the pilgrims.

  • artm »
    Sat Oct 17, 2009 7:02 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 1

    Let all come who will, But let them do it in the legal manner. Try and go to mexio without the proper paper work, you'll be in deep trouble, or anywhere else for that matter.

    America is not the answer for every person who wants to come here Illegally.

  • Sat Oct 17, 2009 5:12 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 2

    I get the sneaky suspicion that what the NCC labels as "hate speech" most Americans would call freedom of speech. And what they seek is censorship of ideas and speech that they do not agree with.

    I don't agree with Rachel Madow or Keith Olbermann, but they have a right to say it. I don't agree with the agenda of the National Council of Churches, but the way to combat them it via debate that is the cornerstone of the founding of America and it's history.

  • Sat Oct 17, 2009 1:28 pm Agree: 11   Disagree: 5

    Lies. All lies.
    If I say that maybe it's not such a good idea to have 20 million people in this country who are here illegally, who have no driver's licenses and are therefore driving uninsured and illegally, this group accuses me of "hate speech against immigrants! WHARGARBL!!!!1!

    So We Might See Coalition: Thou shalt not bear false witness.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links