CP Politics

Friday, Jul 25, 2014

Parents and Teachers Object to Common Core

  • Phyllis Schlafly is a lawyer, conservative political analyst and author of 20 books. She is the co-author, with George Neumayr, of the New York Times Best-Seller titled "No Higher Power: Obama's War on Religious Freedom."
December 10, 2013|3:28 pm

The media are currently filled with reports of students in the U.S. scoring poorly on international tests. The Program for International Student Assessment, which compares 15-year-olds in most industrialized countries, reports that American students dropped from 25th to 31st in math, 11th to 21st in reading and 20th to 24th in science. The solution consistently offered for these low rankings is to spend more money on schooling. But numerous studies examining the billions of dollars we've spent on education in the last decade show that money has not improved the performance of U.S. students, and higher-scoring foreign countries spend far less per pupil than we do.

Now we are told we need a new national system called Common Core State Standards Initiative, and it has provoked a grassroots uprising. Parents don't want federal control or a federal curriculum, and teachers don't like the CC tests.

Common Core advocates loudly proclaim there isn't any CC curriculum, saying there are only standards, which local schools can use to write their own curriculums. But the CC tests (usually called assessments) are the mechanism of federal control over curriculum because teachers must teach to the test.

As states are beginning to implement Common Core, parents and teachers are discovering many things they don't like. An Oak Forest, Ill., high school government class required students and their parents to fill out questionnaires that identified their positions on controversial political issues so they could place themselves on a "political spectrum."

The best way to describe the left-wing bias of this curriculum is to quote some of the questions students are asked, all of which are ideologically slanted. Students are instructed to "put a check in front of each statement with which you agree."

Here are two of the pro-big government statements: "The government has an obligation to regulate businesses in order to preserve the environment for future generations" and "Unregulated free enterprise benefits the rich at the expense of the poor."

Two more slanted statements are: "The government should guarantee medical care for all citizens" and "The federal government should guarantee the rights of homosexuals."

Common Core then requires students to self-identify their political philosophies: "I consider myself A. liberal, B. conservative, C. don't know."

Here is one of the "outcomes" specified as the objective of this biased survey: "Students will be familiar with:

  1. Fascism as an historical example of a reactionary group.
  2. American Revolution as an historical example of a revolutionary viewpoint."

After students check the statements with which they agree, they're given a so-called performance task to "conduct a political spectrum interview with someone 40 years or older" using this same survey.

It's no wonder parents are upset about this assignment, which asks for information that is none of the school's business. This survey, published by the Center for Learning, is from a textbook entitled "U.S. Government 2." It is part of the Common Core curriculum used by Oak Forest High School.

The Common Core-approved history textbook, "The American Experience," published by Prentice Hall, gives an account of World War II the "greatest generation" would not recognize. World War II is presented primarily with photos of the devastation experienced by Hiroshima and text from John Hersey's article "Hiroshima."

The Washington Post published a letter from a Delaware teacher who is highly critical of Common Core because she was instructed "to teach the curriculum word-for-word." Also, she must "stop teaching for six weeks in the spring to make sure our students pass that test."

New Mexico Sen. Tim Keller described in a recent editorial the complaints he hears from parents who "stress deep objection to the continuing trend of out-of-state, for-profit testing companies' intrusion into the classroom." There's just too much testing driven by those with a nefarious "incentive to make the case for more testing."

Of course, tests are important to measure performance. But Common Core tests are a big moneymaking industry and used by the Obama administration to control the content of the curriculum.

And some of the tests sound downright ridiculous. Here is how a New York City high school principal reported one question on a Common Core first-grade math test: "Take a look at question No. 1, which shows students five pennies, under which it says 'part I know,' and then a full coffee cup labeled with a '6' and, under it, the word, 'Whole.' Students are asked to find 'the missing part' from a list of four numbers. My assistant principal for mathematics was not sure what the question was asking. How could pennies be part of a cup?"

Phyllis Schlafly is a lawyer, conservative political analyst and author of 20 books. She is the co-author, with George Neumayr, of the New York Times Best-Seller titled "No Higher Power: Obama's War on Religious Freedom." You can read more of her writings at eagleforum.org.
Source URL : http://www.christianpost.com/news/parents-and-teachers-object-to-common-core-110487/