A dozen rectors and priests in the Episcopal Diocese of Pittsburgh went public this week with their disapproval of the diocesan bishop's effort to leave the national church.
In a letter mailed to the diocese's 66 churches on Tuesday, the 12 conservative clergy said they have "determined to remain within" The Episcopal Church rather than realign out of it, according to Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.
Some of the clergy met Monday with Pittsburgh Bishop Robert Duncan, who is discontent with the national church's liberal direction on Scripture and homosexuality, to inform him they will be going public.
The announcement comes after the Pittsburgh diocese overwhelmingly voted last November to leave The Episcopal Church. A second and final vote of approval for secession is expected later this year at the annual Pittsburgh convention.
While the 12 clergy who signed the recent letter oppose the ordination of openly gay clergy and conducting same-sex blessings, much like Duncan and the majority of the diocese, and say they support the reformation of the Episcopal Church, they do not believe a split is necessary.
"The bishop has made a mistake," said Father Quinn, a priest in the diocese and one of the 12 signers, according to the local Gazette. "He seems to be going in a different direction than we are."
But Bishop Duncan believes the dissenting clergy will be terribly disappointed in their line of action, said Peter Frank, a spokesman for Duncan.
"The place that the majority of the diocese is at is a different place than these priests are ending up," Frank told The Christian Post. "That's difficult where most of the Diocese of Pittsburgh say 'let's get on with ministry and not continue what has been a 30-year losing struggle to reform The Episcopal Church from within.'"
The clergy's public statement this week about was not unexpected, said Frank. The 12 - out of 180 clergy in the diocese - were part of the minority who did not favor leaving The Episcopal Church during last November's vote. Discussion with the dissenting group began last summer and the diocese has been aware of their stance, according to Frank.
Why the group went public this week has not been specified.
Duncan remains a leading conservative in The Episcopal Church and is currently heading an alliance of biblically traditional dioceses and parishes called the Anglican Communion Network. He and several breakaway and conservative bishops have begun talks to create a separate Anglican body in North America.
After decades of struggle, Duncan has expressed little hope The Episcopal Church – the U.S. branch of Anglicanism – will get back in line with traditional Anglicanism and the Bible. The Episcopal Church heightened controversy when it consecrated openly gay bishop V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire in 2003.
Earlier this month, senior bishops in The Episcopal Church certified Duncan as having "abandoned the Communion of this Church." Episcopal Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori warned Duncan he could be banned from his office unless he draws back from his current efforts.
Comments
I'm quite content that I understand what Jesus meant just fine. I also am quite content in the knowledge that Jesus said to listen to his words, and I do. And I am quite content that Paul was an apostle of Jesus Christ and he gave direct instruction as to who would and wouldn't inherit the kingdom of God.
Now, lest you think I'm some knuckledragging, fire-breathing, red state, redneck (and I'm being facetious, because that is the image most "liberal" Christians have of anyone who truly adheres to what the Bible actually *says*) I'll tell you that I have no issue with any homosexual person who is repentant and genuinely seeks God's forgiveness and help in overcoming it. None at all. I wouldn't care if 3/4 of my church were made up of homosexuals, provided they were repentant, celibate, and weren't trying to twist and pervert God's word, or trying to get my church to accept and validate their behavior, institute same sex weddings, etc.
For me, it truly is about the sin and not the sinner. I'm a horrible sinner. We all are. We're all wretched creatures. But God's word is the final word. And I hold to that no matter what, and I look to Jesus Christ. Jesus said there were those that made themselves "eunuchs", and Paul said that it was good and right that some remain celibate. Jesus forgives...but sometimes that's all liberal Christianity wants to talk about...forgiveness. Well, see, they always leave out that little "last bit" that Jesus always tacks on..."go and sin no more"..."repent". So, see, Jesus does forgive, but only those who repent and have a repentant heart. So perhaps homosexuals need to see that as the challenge of their walk with God, to remain celibate. My problem isn't with a homosexual who is repentant and struggling with their sin and seeking God's forgiveness. They are my brother and I would love them the same, and treat them the same, as any other Christian.
But you don't come into my church, or any church, living in an openly homosexual relationship, or worse, in a family situation involving children where the parents are in a same sex relationship, tell me I'm wrong, tell the church its wrong, and demand we acknowledge and accommodate you. That you don't do. That's in violation of God's word. In that case, I would speak the truth to them in love, but it would be the truth. Homosexuality, unconfessed and unrepented of, is a grave sin and has no place in God's church.
I am also reminded of these verses, which you also should take to heart:
1 Timothy 4:1 "Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons"
2 Timothy 4:3
"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, because they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers"
You are not enduring sound doctrine, you have itching ears, and you are falling under the sway of deceiving doctrine. In concern for you, I ask you to consider the scriptures and stop calling good evil and evil good.
You are wrong. Groups *twisted* scripture to find support for those things where there wasn't any. The scripture for slavery, etc, was merely Paul saying to obey the laws of society as they stood then - and it was a *secular* issue in regards to society and the state. Homosexuality is a specific act listed by Paul in a detailed iteration of deep and grave *sins* (this is of God, not the state or interactions with secular society) that he *specifically states* are sins of which the perpetrator *will not inherit the kingdom of God*. Don't tell me I'm self-righteous or misinterpreting or twisting anything. The scripture is there, and it is plain in its understanding - there is nothing about it that requires any deep exegesis to understand it - only common sense and an ability to reason.
I would simply tell you this: if you support homosexuality, and if you believe the church should support homosexual clergy, clergy in openly homosexual relationships, or homosexual marriage, then you are lost unless you repent. There's nothing self-righteous about that statement, either. And there is nothing Pharisaical about it either: 2 Timothy 3:16 "All scripture is God breathed and useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting, and training in righteousness".
You are falling into this trap:
Isaiah 5:20 "Woe to those who call evil good
and good evil,
who put darkness for light
and light for darkness,
who put bitter for sweet
and sweet for bitter."
I hope you turn from your support of something so gravely evil as homosexuality. Calling homosexuality "good" when God calls it "abomination" is putting you in a bad, bad position with God.
If you think homosexuality is on par or equal to slavery, racism or usury, then you are a lot farther gone than you realize. Consider what you're saying.