Updated 11:59 pm.EST, Fri November 20, 2009

Church|Mon, Sep. 21 2009 03:00 PM EDT

Authors Document Explosion of Multi-Site Churches

By Lillian Kwon|Christian Post Reporter

Megachurches aren't the only worship houses launching multi-site campuses.

Although the multi-site movement was championed by big box churches, the phenomenon has spread to smaller communities.

"Multi-site (one church in two or more locations) is no longer just for a church of 2,000 or 5,000 or 10,000," said Geoff Surratt, co-author of A Multi-Site Church Road Trip, in a recent episode of Leadership Network's "The Show."

"We see churches as small as two or three hundred weekend attenders starting to launch new campuses," said Surratt, countering early criticisms that the multi-site movement was about megachurches launching more megachurches.

Surratt, who serves as pastor of Ministries at Seacoast Church in South Carolina, co-wrote the newly released book with Greg Ligon, vice president of Church Innovations at Leadership Network, and Warren Bird, research director at Leadership. The three visited dozens of innovative multi-site churches across the nation to document how the movement has morphed over the past several years.

It's been only three years since the authors released The Multi-Site Church Revolution but in that short time span they've seen the movement explode.

Multi-site churches are in nearly every major U.S. city and state, according to the book, and almost one in ten Protestant worshippers attend a multi-site church in the United States or Canada.

Up from 300 in the year 2000, there are currently 3,000 multi-sites in the country. Among megachurches, 37 percent reported being multi-site in 2008, up from 27 percent in 2005. At the same time, average seating capacities in megachurches have largely remained the same, growing only minimally from 1,709 to 1,794.

But again, you don't have to be a megachurch to go multi-site, the authors stress.

"We've visited enough churches of all sizes, and heard accounts of still more, to affirm with confidence that a healthy church with regular attendance (not membership) of two hundred or more can often become multi-site with an outcome that greatly increases the number and quality of disciples it makes," they state in A Multi-Site Church Road Trip.

And multi-sites do make disciples, they note.

Some critics argue that multi-site churches produce spectators rather than disciples and leaders, but from their experience disciple making does occur.

"In fact, multi-site churches do not survive long unless they put feet to their words about developing the people of God into leaders who reproduce themselves through others," the authors write. "If multi-site churches don't empower God's people for ministry, they fail."

Addressing another concern some have raised over the multi-site approach, Bird refutes the claim that multi-sites make Church into a show and do not connect people to the community. Although it may happen, the co-author has been unable to find any evidence that the typical multi-site with a campus pastor role places less emphasis on community than do regular, single-site churches.

"In our observations and conversations, we've learned that multi-sites must build community or they die," he writes in the book.

Bird also doesn't agree with critics who say video teaching replaces the personal relationship between preacher and local congregation. Though an appropriate concern, Bird questions whether a personal relationship with the preacher is a reality for most churchgoers.

"As a teen, ... I rededicated my life to Christ at the conclusion of a message from my pastor, but I did not have a personal relationship with him," he writes.

"What matters, it seems, is not so much that the preacher knows me personally as that the teacher's message is biblically sound, applied in a way I can understand. Then hopefully the church has altar counselors, Sunday school teachers, youth group leaders, or other on-site people ... to help disciple those who respond to the message."

Multi-site, the authors remind readers, is not really a new phenomenon. It's actually all about the 2,000-year-old challenge of reaching people and making disciples, "just with a different wrapper on the package," they say.

Looking into the future of the multi-site movement, the authors predict: international campuses will help transform approaches to missions; some multi-site churches will go double-digit even triple-digit in their number of campuses; Internet campuses will be accepted as legitimate; and a few multi-site churches (those that use centralized teaching) will become mini-denominations.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:09 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    "Walk into a Catholic or Orthodox Church you will see the book of Acts alive and well..."

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    HAHAHAHAHA. I haven't seen the catholics selling all they have and dispersing it among the poor. That is so funny. The catholic church is the furthest thing from the book of Acts. Deifying man. Praying to dead people. Idolatry. Yeah, that sounds real Acts-like. LOL.

  • Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:08 pm Agree: 8   Disagree: 0

    Let's be careful that we don't throw out the baby with the bathwater here. Paul was constantly corresponding with the churches he had planted and had he had all the technology we have to day wouldn't this be what it looks like. But like others I to am concerned about the Super Star trap for the Senior Pastor. And I find it comical that our roman catholic friends are complaining about this when the diocese model is not all that different in that the bishop has authority over all the priest in his diocese and to a point all the parishes.

  • Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:03 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 0

    IHS,

    Hope you are well today. didn't know that the Holy Spirit was the point (or a point) in this article. As for the Spirit's work and relation in the Godhead; all are equal of course. The issue isn't the Spirit or what He does, the point is what did the apostles along with Christ leave us for a guide and forms. His Spirit didn't nullify His apostle's examples and teachings on what the leadership is in the church, one member of the Trinuity doesn't contradict another. Paul appointed elders in the churches (plural men in the plural churches) period. Our idea of deacons come from Paul's instructions and the appointment in Acts of physical servants to tend to the physical needs. Subjugation of the elders didn't begin until the 2nd century when the Romans (and other people's subjugated by the Roman Empire) decided to adopt a structure more in line with the Roman civil structure and unbiblically change the functions of the leaders by dividing and making such notions as elders not holding the responsibilities given by God.

    Of course, the Roman and Orthodox churches aren't the only ones to mess up the church leadership.

    Grace and Peace,
    Jim

  • Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:12 pm Agree: 8   Disagree: 0

    Chas,

    As a former Catholic I can tell you that those traditions that you speak of are not mentioned in the New Testament and therefore cannot be attributed to the apostle’s teachings . . .

  • Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:08 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 1

    "God the Holy Spirit inspired the Apostles in oral tradition and later in written scripture . . ."

    Yes and those traditions that are in Scripture can be accepted but for those that are absent; well, they are nothing more than traditions of men that cannot and should not be bound to a believer's conscience . . .

  • Chas »
    Thu Sep 24, 2009 5:03 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 9

    Wilderness,

    Walk into a Catholic or Orthodox Church you will see the book of Acts alive and well, and you will see the Traditions that Paul and the Apostles passed down on how to worship."Keep the traditions I have handed on to you either by oral or letter." "Shun those not acting according to Tradition". This Tradition with a capital "T" comes from the Apostles inspired by the Holy Spirit with the fullness of the Sacraments instituted by Christ.

    Walk into a Protestant/Evangelical Church and you will find man-made traditions, made up worship style not in conformity with what the Apostles taught, and services that change every few years to keep the people coming. You won't find any sacraments or maybe just a few, but their theology of those sacraments have been watered down so much not much is left.

    I'll stick with the original interpretation given directly from the Apostles to their successors of the Word by Oral and by Scripture, the Original Church and the original apostolic authority.

    You can stick to your own interpretations."No Prophesy of scripture is open to private interpretation"

  • Thu Sep 24, 2009 3:19 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 0

    "I think the earliest Christians have it right..."

    You can read about them in the New Testament, and in reading about them, you will find no queen in heaven, kissing statues, or an earthly man called "Holy Father" leading them.

    "Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ" (Colossians 2:8.)

  • IHS »
    Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:53 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 7

    Old Student,

    Is the Holy Spirit less than Christ? I don't think so, since both are co-eternal and both are God.

    God the Holy Spirit inspired the Apostles in oral tradition and later in written scripture the hierarchy of the Church; Bishop(greek Episcopos-overseer), Priest(Greek Presbyter-elder), Deacon(Greek-Dianconos-server to the Priest or Bishop).

    All the oldest Churches founded by Apostles have this structure; Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Syriac, Coptic, Armenian Apostolic, Maronite, Byzantine, Chaldean, Ruthenian, Oriental Orthodox and some 20 others. All of these churches formed the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church before different schism. All of their founders new the Apostles and all of them without question had this structure based on Apostolic teaching and scripture.

    Lastly, the Anglicans in the Church of England still retain this as well, and many Lutheran Synods hold to this too.

    This Godly structure of authority has been watered down ever since. My evangelical church and my parent's church only have pastors. I think the earliest Christians have it right, and we evangelicals have it wrong. Afterall, how can the earliest Christian church all got it wrong and we evangelicals who did not know the Apostles get it right?

  • IHS »
    Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:42 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 4

    Good point Full Gospel!

    These mega-site churches are all about the personality of one charismatic preacher. The rest of the pastors are weak in comparison, so their longevity will be based solely on one person and it ain't Jesus.

  • Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:53 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    FG,

    Thanks for your kind words. The superstar issue does raise issues as to who is being followed (this man-following happens in small churches as well) and to what end is the model being used.

    Grace and Peace,
    Jim

  • Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:51 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Paul,

    In Matthew 18, Jesus mentions two or three together true but that is not the church because preceding that statement Jesus speaks of bringing an unrepentant brother to the whole church after bringing two or three with you in another attempt at reconciliation.

    As for church structure itself, Jesus never specified any particular structure or form but He did provide the leadership structure via the apostolic writings or Luke (Acts 14 among other following examples in Acts), Titus and 1 Timothy as well as Peter speaking on it to a degree. Past those references, you are correct that a structure is not mandated in Scripture.

    Grace and Peace,
    Jim

  • Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:47 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 4

    I'll confer with oldstudent in that I have to wonder if Bill Hybels, Rick Warren, Joel Osteen and others left and formed a new church if their congregation would leave with them.

    If yes, who are you following? Isn't it supposed to be about Jesus, just Jesus?

  • Tue Sep 22, 2009 10:33 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Personally I like smaller churches.
    It was to easy for me to get lost in the crowd and do nothing. when I went back to a smaller church was ( at least for me) when I really found out the difference between being a christian and mearly being saved.
    I found out about what James said about faith without works is dead.. and thats when God was able to start to realy convict me.
    For me the distractions of too many people, t.v cameras and other such stuff was too much of a distraction for me.
    For me in a smaller church it was not possible to get lost in the smaller crowd.
    I still do get the Good Word From God by watching on t.v. the mega churches. I will not and can not tell God whom I will and will not recieve his word from.

  • Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:00 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    First time I've come across the appellation 'big box church', but it fits our consumer model. While I can see the temptation of spreading the talents of good teachers and administrators, this seems to be a copy of the old RC monachialism, and risks keeping new talent from arising.

    When Jesus spoke of the church He spoke of no structure but merely mentioned two or three gathering. Sometimes structure gets in the way.

  • Mon Sep 21, 2009 4:27 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 2

    It may be an unintended consequence but shouldn't we be concerned about the "star pastor" becoming an even more ingrained issue? I;m not saying this is evil by any means but it seems to make the preacher a preacher only whereas historically the preacher has also been one of the elders and a shepherd of the flock. preaching isn't shepherding but can be a part of shepherding the flock.

    Grace and Peace,
    Jim

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Church Fundraisers
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Church
  • Gifts
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Bethany House Publishers

It was a balmy California evening. I had gone for a jog before I was to speak at a leadership conference. I still can't recall how I got there, but I found myself sitting on a curb

Featured Advertiser Links