Updated 12:47 pm.EST, Sun November 22, 2009

Society|Mon, Mar. 30 2009 04:08 PM EDT

Survey: Faith Beliefs of Conservatives, Liberals Differ Greatly

By Jennifer Riley|Christian Post Reporter

Social, political conservatives differ significantly from liberals regarding religious beliefs, according to a new study that compared the two groups on more than a dozen religious beliefs.

Liberals are dramatically less likely than conservatives to say they believe that the Bible is totally accurate in all of its teachings (27 percent vs. 63 percent, respectively), the survey conducted by The Barna Group found.

Only about a third (38 percent) of liberals say their faith is becoming an increasingly important moral guide in their life. By comparison, 70 percent of conservatives say their faith is an important moral guide.

Also fewer liberals than conservatives believe that a person cannot earn their way into Heaven by doing good deeds or being a good person (23 percent vs. 37 percent).

George Barna, the study’s lead researcher, commented that liberals appear to place more emphasis on “self-reliance” and “what they personally accomplish” than on faith or participation in a faith community.

“They also seem less inclined to trust the Bible as a moral authority or source of truth, and have less involvement in some type of personal relationship with their god.”

In contrast, Barna said conservatives are more active in religious behaviors.

“They are also more connected to their deity, seeing God as more personal, interactive and involved in their lives than do liberals,” the researcher noted.

A little more than half of liberals (54 percent) say their religious faith is very important in their life, compared to 82 percent of conservatives. The importance of faith in the life of a social or political liberal compared to a conservative can also be seen in the difference in church attendance and how they view it.

Thirty-seven percent of liberals say the church they currently attend is very important in helping them find direction and fulfillment in life whereas 62 percent of conservatives say church is important as a guide in their life.

In a typical week, conservatives are more likely than liberals to read the bible other than at church (57 percent, vs. 33 percent); attend religious service (62 percent vs. 35 percent); pray to God other than at a religious service (91 percent vs. 76 percent); share their religious beliefs with others during the past year (56 percent vs. 39 percent, among born-again Christians for each group); and have participated in a short-term missions trip in the U.S. or in another country (12 percent vs. 6 percent).

The survey also found that liberals are more likely than conservatives to develop their own set of religious beliefs rather than adopt those proposed by a church or other entity. More liberals than conservatives also said they are very open to adopting different moral views than the ones they currently have.

The Barna Group based the report on the 3,012 phone interviews with American adults it conducted from August through early November 2008. The sample included 992 adults who described themselves as “mostly conservative” on social and political matters, and 511 adults who described themselves as “mostly liberal” on social and political matters. The rest of the sample described themselves as somewhere between these two groups.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:14 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 2

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Many conservatives also outgive liberals in charitable contributions. Many liberals are generous with other people's money but not their own. hide

  • Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:10 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I am always amazed how we who call ourselves Christian so easily get off the subject and start with personal attacks.. I have read many of the comments on here and have seen what side each person is on simply by the side they are defending..Sadly none have really defended the "Faith" in their comments...We tend to skirt the "Faith" as we comment but so easily go back to our "political" points... this is a very sad survey because it shows how we Christians have lost our way..We no longer stand for the things of the Bible like the apostles and prophets of the past.. we get wrapped up in what president is better and things like this, but NO president will ever decide where we spend eternity..we are going somewhere after we die, where are you going?? that is the question that should concern all of us.. not what the president did about any political stunt..we should be concerned where our neighbor is going after they die, not if they are from one party or the other, or if they have money to pay their mortgage, if we are true Christians we will stand up and do the right thing for our neighbors, that is be concerned about their eternal soul first, then about what is happening in their life while here on earth... I just wanted to show that this survey has shown that the "Church" as a whole is not following the Bible anymore, we are more "of" the world then "in" the world like we should be... and yes, if this offends you maybe you should look at your Christian "walk", because all of what I have said is Bible 101, it is not left or right, liberal or conservative, it is simple "back to the basics" of the Christian faith...Love your brother so much that you care for their eternal life more than their life here on earth, God has this place under control....What happens, happens...

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:28 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "You mention something curious though. Borrowing from other countries is unBiblical? Did you think Bush was a Godly leader? If so, what would you have to say about his running up the national debt from 5.5 trillion to nearly 11 trillion during his term (far and away the largest run-up in national debt the country has ever seen)? "

    Wait till Obama is done. At this rate Obama will pass that before his first year in office is up. The problem is simple. We are a society which has said "the Bible is stupid and we're going to do what we want". We've ignored common sense from the Bible.

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:26 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    bass, personally, I think churches should speak to the issues only and stay totally away from endorsing candidates or parties!

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:14 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    " I never said that the church shouldn't speak out on what it believes, but if the church, or any other institution that receives public funds (or tax relief, which is the other side of the coin), practices partisan politics, it should no longer keep its tax-exempt status. "

    Never said I disagreed with you. :D Our church is a bit different in that it is a not-for-profit corporation instead of a "church" when it comes to the tax code. We did that on purpose.

    As for Bush... King David committed adultry and murder as a result. Still, the Bible says David was a man after God's own heart. What one desires to do and what one does are sometimes two different things. Also, the Executive branch cannot borrow money on it's own that I'm aware of. I was part of a stim bill that went through Congress. They would have had some say in who the money was borrowed from.

    This all started when we went off the gold standard. The President who did that is where the buck stops (gotta love the pun) on borrowing from other governments.

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:45 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Believer - That is what churches have done for a long time. They teach what the Bible says and the members of the congregation match those teachings up with certain candidates. It's grey, I suppose, but as long as the church is teaching Biblical principles and not endorsing candidates (telling congregations they need to vote one way or another if they are true Christians), the IRS has left it alone. Rightfully so, I guess. But open endorsement? All one has to do is turn the tables and consider how we would feel about an tax-exempt institution effectively using our paid-in tax dollars to openly campaign for a socialist candidate. I think the answer as to how most would feel about that would be clear.

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:39 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    bass, I'm torn on that one as I see pluses and minuses both ways, but at the same time churches should be free to speak to the issues without outsiders making the assumption they are actively supporting specific candidates who support the church's point of view on the issue and without it impacting the church's tax exempt status.

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:17 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Daniel Paul - If you cut off the end of my sentence and respond to the out-of-context fragment you want, there is really no point in responding. I never said that the church shouldn't speak out on what it believes, but if the church, or any other institution that receives public funds (or tax relief, which is the other side of the coin), practices partisan politics, it should no longer keep its tax-exempt status. That's all I said.

    You mention something curious though. Borrowing from other countries is unBiblical? Did you think Bush was a Godly leader? If so, what would you have to say about his running up the national debt from 5.5 trillion to nearly 11 trillion during his term (far and away the largest run-up in national debt the country has ever seen)?

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:09 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    The survey is not clear on whether the poll was amoungst Christians or the general population. Assuming the survey is amoungst the general population about 17% of people here consider themselves "mostly liberal". Half of that group say their religious faith is very important in their life. That is only about 8% of the population that would fall into the "Godless liberal" category. The survey also indicates about 6% of the population are "Godless conservatives". It most likely the fight between the 6% on one side and the 8% on the other side that causes most of the controversy that divides our Country. It appears to me that most of us are believers who are manipulated by secularists into taking sides in a battle that diverts us from the call of the Holy Spirit.

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:08 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    again lets not fall into the trap set for us..we,on the right are the true Liberals..we are for individual freedom versus the gawd almighty fascist state..since America has been going left since FDR..if one is for that..one is a conservative..for the status quo!!!!.The Left worship only themselves..despise we the people..so their 'faith' is that we are nothing but consumers..useful idiots in other words...Ves

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:06 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "What I would say is that when a church decides to cross the line and openly campaign for a candidate"

    Jesus openly campaigned for Godliness. If the church teaches what is Godly and a candidate operates that way then it's not a big jump in logic. Still, it is not the place of a church to campaign. It is the job of the church to educate their people in what is Godly and what is not. The fruits of this will manifest themselves in the voting booth.

    Do you think if the church in America had a clear message that abortion was wrong that Obama would have been elected? Do you think that if America understood that borrowing from another country is a Biblically wrong thing to do that Obama's plan would have gotten anywhere? We reap what we sow. Washington, DC is a reaping of what we have sown.

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 3:00 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    "It was no different. If we don't go back to teaching doctrine, we are doomed as a culture."

    How about "Christ and Him crucified". We have a culture where we accept His forgiveness for our sins but do not take up the cross. It's like "the bill is paid and it's off our eternal credit report" and they go back to charging again....

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 2:16 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Believer - You may be entirely right on certain liberal-leaning churches being part of politicking for a long time. I suppose that to a certain extent the crossover is inevitable. What I would say is that when a church decides to cross the line and openly campaign for a candidate, then that church should be prepared to lose its tax-exempt status. Can't have it both ways.

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 1:46 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    bass, for the most part I agree evangelical conservative Christians tend to be republicans, but at the same time liberal Christians tend to be democrats. But as for political speeech I believe the liberals got us conservatives totally beat on that one and in fact politically motivated messages in liberal churches have been around for many years, I have a close Christian brother who is an Associate Pastor at a large black Baptist church in Virginia and he has for years told me that politically motivated message in the black church are nothing new and while some may come from the conservative point of view most come from the liberal.

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:28 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Believer - We are in full agreement on this one. Complete and utter waste of time. But the result of this survey has little to do with religion and much to do with politics. For years, the GOP has courted the church and the church has obliged with a smile. What has resulted is a basic belief that being a Christian and being a Republican are synonymous to the point that pastors, backed by the Aliance Fund, have the audacity to preach politics from the pulpit. So the church has become more and more a pawn of a political party. Meanwhile, that same political party has become a pawn of the powerful Christian leaders, to the point that it is now a party divided right down the middle with social conservatives (read evangelicals and a handful of catholics on one side) and economic conservatives (read Wm Buckleys and the like). There is a reason for separation of church and state, something that benefits Americans both inside and outside the church. Events of the past few years in the U.S. have never more clearly shown this to be the case.

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 8:03 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    cowboy, we fall terribly short in discipling believers and this is the consequence, cheap grace theology and/or cafeteria Christianity!

  • Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:54 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    Christianity is fast becoming liberalized as the mainstream culture and media is turning our young people against what the Bible says and watering it down. I was reading a copy of Christianity Today and thought I was reading Time magazine. It was no different. If we don't go back to teaching doctrine, we are doomed as a culture.

  • Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:34 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    My goodness, believer, we agree on something! What an absolute waste of time this survey was, but that's Barna for you.

  • Mon Mar 30, 2009 7:04 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    And this is news!!!!! I wonder how much this wasted study cost?

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Also on CP
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links