Updated 09:38 pm.EST, Fri November 20, 2009

Society|Thu, Sep. 17 2009 10:01 AM EDT

Study: Religious Beliefs 'Strongly Predict' Teen Birth Rates

By Eric Young|Christian Post Reporter

A new study is suggesting a “strong” link between the religiosity of a state’s residents and the teen birth rate there.

Though only half of the states listed among the ten most conservatively religious also appear in the list of ten states with the highest teen birth rates, researchers behind the latest study say increased religiosity in residents of states in the U.S. strongly predicted a higher teen birth rate.

“With data aggregated at the state level, conservative religious beliefs strongly predict U.S. teen birth rates, in a relationship that does not appear to be the result of confounding by income or abortion rates,” researchers reported in the summary for their report, “Religiosity and Teen Birth Rates,” which was published Thursday in the Reproductive Health journal.

“One possible explanation for this relationship is that teens in more religious communities may be less likely to use contraception,” the researchers added.

 For the study, Joseph Strayhorn of Drexel University College of Medicine and University of Pittsburgh compiled publicly accessible data on birth rates, conservative religious beliefs, income, and abortion rates in the U.S., aggregated at the state level. The religiosity information came from a sample of nearly 36,000 participants who were part of the U.S. Religious Landscapes Survey by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life conducted in 2007, while the teen birth and abortion statistics came from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

For religiosity, Strayhorn and report co-author Jillian C. Strayhorn averaged the percentage of respondents who agreed with conservative responses to eight statements, including: ''There is only one way to interpret the teachings of my religion," and ''Scripture should be taken literally, word for word."

“At the state level in the U.S., religiosity, as operationally defined by the eight questions of the Pew Survey, accurately predicts a high teen birth rate,” the researchers wrote in their report.

“[T]he magnitude of the correlation between religiosity and teen birth rate astonished us,” they added.

But the researchers cautioned against inferring from their results that “Religious teens get pregnant more often.”

“It would be a statistical and logical error” to do so, they stated. “Such an inference would be an example of the ecological fallacy.”

Instead, the researchers speculated that conservative religious communities in the U.S. are more successful in discouraging use of contraception among their teen community members than in discouraging sexual intercourse itself.

Notably, while researchers found a positive correlation between religiosity and teen birth rates, they also found that abortion rates correlated negatively with religiosity.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Thu Sep 24, 2009 9:49 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Exactly, Believer!

    Use of condoms may decrease your chances of getting pregnant, but it does not eliminate that chance. I know of at least 10 people personally (including myself) who have become pregnant despite the proper use of condoms. Having a teacher tell you that condoms make it ok to have sex and that you won't get diseases or get pregnant isn't any better. Having a teacher go into details as to WHY you should abstain - because it IS the ONLY 100% effective method of birth control and disease prevention - does work. A teacher coming in and saying "Don't have sex. Thanks, bye." won't work. Kids need real, tangible reasons that support that position.

    I also don't understand the assertion by various posters here that contraceptives are less available in "religious" states. I've lived in and visited at least 15 states ("religious" and "liberal") and I found absolutely NO difference in the availability of condoms and other contraceptives. The layout of the drugstores was the only thing that varied. Each and every one had a decent selection of condoms. So, I have no idea what states you're speaking of, but I seriously doubt your claim holds any water. Teens (whether religious or not) are generally quite wary about going into a drug store and buying condoms - yet more evidence that they're not ready to have sex in the first place - this would also contribute to the lack of condom use.

  • Tue Sep 22, 2009 12:56 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    H316, how do you know she only received abstinence only education and how do you know they didn't use a condom?

  • Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:53 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    A new study released today discredits this study. It shows that only states with high Black Protestant traditions correlate with births to unwed mothers. There's actually a negative correlation for Mainline Protestants and Catholics, and barely a correlation with Evangelical states.

    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2201617/study_linking_most_religious_us_states.html?cat=52

  • Sun Sep 20, 2009 4:31 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 5

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Weekender, the lesson to take from Bristol Palin is not "abstinence works," but that "abstinence-only education does not work." She would have had sex either way because that's what people do and it's a ridiculous assumption to think that a schoolteacher telling you not to have sex is going to get you not to have sex. But if she had talked that guy into wearing a condom like she should have, then she wouldn't have gotten pregnant. hide

  • Sat Sep 19, 2009 9:17 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    The reason for high birth rates among religious teens is easily understood as being due to their choice not to have abortions. But that that sexual revolution has seduced much of the young is also evident, along with its multiple deleterious effects. Multitudes of stats here: http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/RevealingStatistics.html

  • Fri Sep 18, 2009 7:25 pm Agree: 6   Disagree: 2

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Why would these results surprise anyone? More conservative states tend to teach more abstinence and to provide less contraception. Since, to a large degree, teens will have sex no matter what you do it stands to reason that whoever is without the contraception will experience more pregnancies. Am I missing something? hide

  • Fri Sep 18, 2009 10:48 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    It does sound like a very poorly done survey. On the other hand, part of the answer might be our church youth programs which have an awful record for producing disciples of Christ. Using the world's methods to attract the youth, often churches have to use the world's methods to keep the youth. As always, following the methods used in the New Testament and relying on the Holy Spirit is what actually does work. The church in America has not been so good about that.

  • Fri Sep 18, 2009 6:49 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    This survey report leaves a lot of unanswered questions that when answered may paint a whole different light on the interpretation of the results. Nothing is said as to how much sex education was received by the teens and what type of sex education they received. As one poster noted nothing is mentioned with regards to if any of the teens were married. Nothing is said with regards to the education and economic status of these teens. Nothing is said with regards to the "religiosity" of the teens. Before a proper interpretation of this study can be given, most if not all these issues must be addressed.

  • Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:19 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    "What's so funny/ironic about that, homo? Palin's very own daughter has proved that NOT being abstinent does NOT work, so doesn't it make sense that BEING abstinent DOES work!"

    -Weekender

    Weekender,

    You are joking, right? The vast majority of people who get pregnant do so by having sex. That doesn't mean anything. The point is that teaching abstinence alone is not working.

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:55 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    "That would have been a feaky looking gal in the Song of Soloman...."

    Awake, oh north wind and come thou south . . . my wife sings those lyrics to me on a regular basis . . .

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:53 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 3

    What's so funny/ironic about that, homo? Palin's very own daughter has proved that NOT being abstinent does NOT work, so doesn't it make sense that BEING abstinent DOES work!

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:33 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 1

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Ironic related story right below this one: "Palin says abstinence-only ed works." hide

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 7:34 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 3

    Flagged as inappropriate. show "Thus the health and well being of our kids is sacrificed on the altar of our self-righteousness" Amen. hide

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:51 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 4

    Not another "shocking" study about "religious" people.
    There are more important things happening that CP could report on.

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:48 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 1

    "The minute a person does something disapproved by the group, the fundamentalists define them as not truly Christian."

    Unfortunately, the term "fundamentalist" has gotten a bad rap over the years. Fundamentalists are, by definition, "a movement in American Protestantism that arose in the early part of the 20th century in reaction to modernism and that stresses the infallibility of the Bible not only in matters of faith and morals but also as a literal historical record, holding as essential to Christian faith belief in such doctrines as the creation of the world, the virgin birth, physical resurrection, atonement by the sacrificial death of Christ, and the Second Coming."

    Simply put, it is those who believe the Bible is true as written. Now, as for the "fundies"...pharaseeism is alive and well. Please don't confuse the two....

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:44 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    "We all know about the poetic language"

    That would have been a feaky looking gal in the Song of Soloman....

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:43 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 1

    "This doesn't necessarily mean that religion causes kids to drop out of school, but they are related somehow. "

    The problem is in the understanding of religion. Jesus was not very pleased by religion. Many people mistake religion for Christianity. They are not the same. It has been my experience that religious people are more interested in "the rules" than they are in grace leading to obedience.

    So, it doesn't surprise me that rebelious teens find sex to be of interest in a "law" based understanding of Christianity....

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:12 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 2

    This article is old news, just reconfirmed. So instead of a link we have a strong link now. Is anyone really surprised? Degree of religiosity of US states correlates to more than just teen pregnancy, as you might imagine. Another correlation is with high school drop out rates.

    This doesn't necessarily mean that religion causes kids to drop out of school, but they are related somehow. Perhaps whatever characteristic or influence that inclines people to religion also predisposes them to dropping out.

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 5:01 pm Agree: 6   Disagree: 4

    You don't get the argument Steveh20. The minute a person does something disapproved by the group, the fundamentalists define them as not truly Christian. Until they repent. But it is true that teens who are trusting abstinence are unlikely to have contraception or use it correctly when they suddenly find they need it. Effective contraception is also harder to come by in those highly religious states. The feeling is that anyone (Christian or not) who violates God's commandments on sex deserves the negative outcome -pregnancy, disease, etc. And anyone who anyone who acts through education or providing effective contraception to mitigate the consequences is anti-God. Thus the health and well being of our kids is sacrificed on the altar of our self-righteousness. In most of these state, youth who become teen parents can recieve birth control information after pregnancy occurs.

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:28 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 2

    A true Christian isn't promiscuous.....

    How ridiculous....Of course a "true Christian" (whatever that might mean) could be promiscuous, that's like saying a true Christian never sins, that's what redemption is all about, as one grows into the likeness of Christ, things change. Christians sometimes don't always live up to the ideals they should, but there is repentance, forgiveness and the continuing journey with our Lord. For the Christian, constant change is here to stay.

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:14 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 6

    "One possible explanation for this relationship is that teens in more religious communities may be less likely to use contraception..."

    OR it could mean (at least where it involves Christians) that people today CLAIM to be Christians but really aren't. They may have an intellectual idea of God - They "believe" "in God" or their version of who they think He is to them (postmodernism at work), but they don't actually DO anything He says."

    In other words, God is an accessory to their lifestyle like a pet, a car, or their favorite American Idol. He has no bearing on their spiritual condition whatsoever, and they prefer it that way.

    This is American "Christianity".

    A true Christian isn't promiscuous. A true Christian doesn't live like the world. A true Christian has come out from the culture and is a NEW CREATION in Christ. He/she has died to the old man and is living in newness of life. He does not live like the world or indulge in worldly things. He is "set apart" unto God. He is motivated by the Holy Spirit and allows Him to work in him "both to will and to do of His good pleasure."

    A pretender would never allow any of this in his/her life.

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:12 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 2

    "Instead, the researchers speculated that conservative religious communities in the U.S. are more successful in discouraging use of contraception among their teen community members than in discouraging sexual intercourse itself."

    I think this would be a very fair conclusion to the study, no matter how one might want to put a spin on it.

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 2:06 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    Cheisa, I definately agree with you there. I am a conservative Christian but when someone mocks me or says "You believe the bible is literally true don't you?", I get somewhat frustrated and cannot answer yes because I realize that they are not familiar with Hermeneutics. We would not read the book of Proverbs or Psalms (which is largely poetic in nature), in the same way we would read 1 or 2 Kings which is largely Historical. Also you are correct that in the New Testament early Christians cryptically referred to Rome as Babylon, this was sometimes done to hide their real location as well as to express a theological point. It would be unfair to take it "literally" when the context clearly doesn't direct us to that point.

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 1:35 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 4

    ''Scripture should be taken literally, word for word."

    If this was one of the criteria for determining what kind of Christian to interview, they didn't get a very broad sampling. We all know about the poetic language, allegory and such that are not to be taken literally.

    For example, Rome is referred to as Babylon. Taken literally, word for word, Babylon would be Babylon, not Rome. That's just one of the obvious examples.

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 11:30 am Agree: 7   Disagree: 5

    Flagged as inappropriate. show This study just shows that in non-religous states the girls choose to abort their mistakes rather than take responsibilty for them. Murder for convenience is nothing to be proud of. hide

  • Thu Sep 17, 2009 10:26 am Agree: 6   Disagree: 2

    What this study does not discuss is the fact that those who are highly religious get married much earlier as well, and thus have children earlier. For example it is very common in my church to see teenagers married by the age of 18 or 19 and to have kids shortly there-after. In addition a good portion of my college-age christian group had gotten married in their teens and had children. I would be curious to see if this study asked and determined what percentage of those who were teens and had children, were also married.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links