Updated 11:59 pm.EST, Fri November 20, 2009

Society|Fri, Sep. 18 2009 11:59 PM EDT

Over 50 Groups Call for End to Faith-Based Hiring Policy

By Aaron J. Leichman|Christian Post Reporter

Nearly 60 groups are pressing the Obama administration to put an end to a Bush-era policy that allowed federally-funded faith-based groups to hire only fellow believers.

In a letter sent Thursday, the 58 groups – which include the ACLU, the Anti-Defamation League, and the Human Rights Campaign – asked U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr., to direct the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) to review and ultimately withdraw a 2007 memorandum that they say "threatens crucial religious freedom protections."

“The OLC Memo's interpretation that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 ("RFRA") provides for a blanket override of statutory nondiscrimination provisions is erroneous and threatens core civil rights and religious freedom protections,” wrote the groups, many of which are also members of the Coalition Against Religious Discrimination (CARD).

“We accordingly request that the Obama Administration publicly announce its intention to review the OLC Memo, and that at the end of that review, withdraw the OLC Memo and expressly disavow its erroneous interpretation of RFRA, the most significant free exercise protection of the post-Smith era,” they concluded.

The hiring policy of the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives has been a source of controversy since Bush established the office in 2001 and Obama had vowed on the presidential campaign trail to reverse the hiring policy so that groups receiving federal money would no longer be allowed to discriminate based on religion.

"As someone who used to teach constitutional law, I believe deeply in the separation of church and state," Obama said last July in a speech about expanding Bush's office of faith-based initiatives. "If you get a federal grant, you can't use that grant money to proselytize to the people you help, and you can't discriminate against them – or against the people you hire – on the basis of their religion."

This past February, however, the Obama administration decided to continue allowing federally-funded religious groups to consider an applicant’s religion when hiring – at least, for the time being.

Before a final decision on hiring guidelines is made, the Bush-era hiring policy was to first undergo a legal review.

In the meantime, until a better solution can be found, Obama’s new and expanded faith-based office was to deal with complaints against faith-based groups receiving federal funding on a case-to-case basis.

However, as the White House has yet to give any indication on when a final decision might be expected, the 58 groups decided to step up its campaign to end what they view as federally-funded religious discrimination.

“The Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) was enacted to protect religion and those who wish to freely exercise it,” said the Rev. Dr. C. Welton Gaddy, president of the Interfaith Alliance, which signed Thursday’s letter along with other religious, education, civil rights, labor and health organizations. “Unfortunately, the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) memo instead turned RFRA into an enabler of religious discrimination.”

In continuing, Gaddy said, “I join my colleagues in calling upon Attorney General Holder to ensure that religion is never used as a means for an organization to implement discriminatory hiring decisions.

“Today, the battle to protect religious freedom is hard enough without the government, which should be defending the Constitution, making it more difficult. I look forward to the day when this harmful and constitutionally suspect memo is rescinded,” the interfaith leader concluded.

Other faith-based organizations among the 58 signers include United Church of Christ Justice and Witness Ministries, the General Board of Church and Society of the United Methodist Church, and the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:11 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    It appears that believer and mwalsh that by accepting tax dollars that those groups can discriminate under the guise of religious freedom.

    They fail to understand that by accepting the money they must not discriminate on the basis of religious affiliation. They may not proselytize and/or promote religion from the extension of funding from the federal money.

    In other words the money is earmarked to be used to promote a public good which is secular and not to be based upon one groups religious ideology or practices.

    they knew it before they took it and once they ran out of rope are whining cause they got called for it. They can only dangle so long before they lose their grip but that was expected as they have given up on reality long ago and relied purely upon fantasy as a means to justify their actions. If they want to prey upon people then let them finance their endeavors via contributions from those who follow their ideology and only use the funding for the intended purpose they took it to use in the first place.

    The groups of fanatics know full well they can't do what the government can't do and that is discriminate or force others to comply with a religious ideology in order to work. To do so is tantamount to the "mark of the beast" that they rail about and then engage in knowingly and turn a blind eye and ear to once they are shown to have committed the acts.

    Stop the discrimination and use the money for legitimate purposes or simply give it back and stop pretending to disobey their ideology. You can't have it both ways, you don't get to keep the cash and then violate the law.

    But what do you expect from congregations that hire convicted child molesters and allow them to have access to the children and for their handlers who run the organizations to ignore a database and background checks to protect the membership.

    They simply don't care what they do it is all about forced compliance and once they have the cash they cut and run to perpetrate other crimes.

    TFR

  • Tue Sep 22, 2009 1:10 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    cheisa, the issue is not hiring of people outside of their faith or denomination, but rather being forced to hire people outside of their faith or denomination.

  • Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:15 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    I think it's ironic that those who are the first to complain about religious discrimination are standing tall for practicing that same discrimination themselves.

    This isn't some plot to force faith based groups to hire atheists, just an attempt to protect against discrimination based on religion that wouldn't be tolerated in any other sphere. And, since these groups have accepted government funding, they've put themselves in a position to play by the rules set by the people paying the freight.

    These are charitable groups, not missionaries, so if a potential employee can get the job done, they shouldn't be required to be Baptist or Lutheran or Catholic. That's all this review is saying. And if the goal is to sustain that kind of religious "purity", then Obama is right in ending it.

  • Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:05 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. show "I see that the ... has returned" It never left. Such is the nature of obsession. hide

  • Sun Sep 20, 2009 6:42 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 3

    Flagged as inappropriate. show I see that the flamin' FLAGGOT has returned. hide

  • Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:10 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 6

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Rollie...Oh you mean my mega churches to become strip clubs if they had to pay taxes? OK maybe some will become Chinese buffets. hide

  • Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:08 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 5

    Flagged as inappropriate. show No joke, time to give the Xian a poke hide

  • Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:04 am Agree: 5   Disagree: 2

    Actually, this would make about as much sense as democrats having to hire republicans a phone surveyor for their party. Or visa versa. How about a Muslim organization being forced by the government to hire a Christian to be their "pastor".

  • Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:00 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Hopefully, this is a joke.

  • Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:17 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 4

    Flagged as inappropriate. show What we really need is an end to tax exemptions based on delusional superstitions. That's a true Separation of Church from the State. Watch those mega churches become strip clubs and casinos when they have to pay property taxes. hide

  • Sun Sep 20, 2009 9:13 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 4

    Flagged as inappropriate. show About time to end institutionalized bigotry. hide

  • Sun Sep 20, 2009 7:21 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    USAsoccer, that is the organization that went with those who left the SBC as a result of the Conservative Resurgance who are closely associated with the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship and Carter, Clinton, and Gore. So their view here surprises no one!

  • Sun Sep 20, 2009 1:04 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    and the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty."

    It is great how a group of say, 100 people, can give themselves a name that has nothing to do with say, the group they propose to represent. I would LOVE to meet the alleged Baptist's who support this move?

    This is typical wrong headed view of our constitution, and a failure to appreicaite that religious groups have the same rights to demand an applicant be qualified for a job as would a law firm, corporation, or other business?

    Being a Baptist might be a pre-requsite to work for the Southern Baptist Convention food program. Just like having a JD is a requirement for a job with a law firm.

    Clueless!

  • Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:40 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    gem, your views speak so clearly the hypocrisy of liberalism in America!!

  • Sat Sep 19, 2009 11:18 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 3

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Money often comes with strings attached. Don't like the strings, don't take the money. hide

  • Sat Sep 19, 2009 6:24 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 4

    Amen, believer!!!!!!!!!!

  • Sat Sep 19, 2009 5:34 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 3

    What a joke these organizations are, they want to protect the Constitution by violating the religious freedom guaranteed by the Constitution by forcing Faith-Based agencies to hire people who don't agree with their religious beliefs.

  • Sat Sep 19, 2009 2:33 pm Agree: 7   Disagree: 4

    Isn't it interesting how these blatantly anti-Christian groups give themselves names that make them sound as though they are people of faith???

    This is a very dangerous event. Contact your congresspersons and tell them to continue to protect faith-based organizations from frivelous attacks by anti-Christian groups. The faith-based Christian community is extremely important to the moral fiber of our nation. If the protections are lifted then there will be a flood of individuals with very anti-Christian motives who will intentionally make application for hire to faith-based agencies. They will do this for the sole purpose of being able to bring civil lawsuits against these organzations.

    Pray that Obama is not allowed to violate the freedom of religion in America. Faith based organizations should enjoy protection from religious descrimination. Forcing them to hire anti-Christian individuals will erode the foundation of faith-based schools, churches, and charitable associations.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links