Updated 08:19 pm.EST, Fri November 20, 2009

Society|Fri, Nov. 06 2009 10:50 AM EDT

Planned Parenthood Clinic Director Resigns After Witnessing Abortion

By Lawrence Jones|Christian Post Reporter

The director of a Planned Parenthood abortion center in Texas has resigned and embraced the pro-life movement after witnessing an abortion through an ultrasound.

  • Planned Parenthood Clinic Director Resigns
    (Photo: Coalition for Life)
    Abby Johnson, left, the former director of a Planned Parenthood clinic in Texas, stands next to Shawn Carney, National Campaign Director of 40 Days for Life, whose group prays outside the clinic.

Abby Johnson had worked at the clinic in Bryan/College Station, Texas, for eight years before departing from the facility after her change of heart.

"I left on good terms and simply had a change of heart on this issue,” she told 40 Days for Life, which had been holding prayer and fasting initiatives outside her clinic since fall of 2004. “Over the past few months I had seen a change in motivation regarding the financial impact of abortions and really reached my breaking point after witnessing a particular kind of abortion on an ultrasound."

 According to reports, Johnson had never seen an abortion take place on an ultrasound but happened to be present during one procedure, in which she saw a 13-weeks-old fetus trying to move away from the doctor’s probe

"I just thought, 'What am I doing?'" she told ABC News. "And then I thought, 'Never again.'"

Two weeks later, Johnson quit.

"It's truly been a testament to the power of prayer and the courage of Abby to leave a job she felt she could no longer do in good conscience," commented Shawn Carney, the director of the Coalition for Life and a 40 Days for Life board member.

"It has been a joy for all of our volunteers who have prayed outside of the clinic for the conversion of the clinic workers to witness that conversion actually happens."

According to 40 Days for Life, Johnson is one of eight abortion industry workers who left their jobs during the fifth coordinated 40 Days for Life campaign that concluded recently in 212 cities. Johnson was the highest-ranking of the eight, the campaign reported. Others who quit their clinic jobs included nurses, office staffers and security personnel.

In the wake of Johnson's departure, Planned Parenthood has gone to court to seek a restraining order against both Johnson and the Coalition for Life, the local group that originated 40 Days for Life and continued regular prayer vigils in front of the clinic for the past five years.

Planned Parenthood filed the "restraining order of disclosure" against Johnson reportedly because of fears she may have taken confidential files out of the organization. Johnson, however, has denied those allegations.

A court hearing on the order is scheduled in a Texas court on Nov. 10.

Coalition for Life director Carney has been working with Johnson since she left her job last month.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
1 | 2
  • Sun Nov 15, 2009 8:52 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    FOR MICKEY: What I want toi know is...do youbelieve the bible is the inerrant infallible inspired Word of God. AND... if you dont... which parts do you believe are inspired which ones not and how did you determine which ones are from God and which ones from man?

  • Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:50 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "I asked you if you were saved and you said yes, yet you just proved yourself to be a liar, you don't even believe the Bible."

    I believe the Bible and that some of it is allegory. You apparently have no clue about the Bible or history. Sad .

  • Sat Nov 14, 2009 6:15 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    "You really can't be this dumb. There were many civilizations long before the Judeo-Christian Bible was even thought of. Some left records, some not. You did go to school didn't you?"

    And it seems before the world was even Created.

    I asked you if you were saved and you said yes, yet you just proved yourself to be a liar, you don't even believe the Bible.

  • Sat Nov 14, 2009 5:26 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    "Well then you would be going back to before the Lord Created the earth, so unless you know something we don't . . . ."

    You really can't be this dumb. There were many civilizations long before the Judeo-Christian Bible was even thought of. Some left records, some not. You did go to school didn't you?

  • Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:38 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    "Obviously it would have to be recorded time. Did you think someone knows what went on before recorded time? Come on DP, at least use your head occasionally."

    Well then you would be going back to before the Lord Created the earth, so unless you know something we don't . . . .

  • Sat Nov 14, 2009 11:45 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    The need for an injunction is obvious. Little Abby is likely selling what she knows to the anti-abortion nuts.

    Serious concerns remain that information might have been passed along that puts clients and employees at risk. The petition puts it this way: "Every service provider that works for [Planned Parenthood's] Bryan Health Center has already been a target of the Coalition for Life in the past. If Johnson discloses information about the employees, clients, and service providers to the public, these people will be subject to protests, harassment, and perhaps physical violence from groups and individuals that oppose [the clinic's] activities." In the wake of Dr. George Tiller's murder, it's indisputable how very real that threat is.

  • Sat Nov 14, 2009 11:43 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Apparently there's a lot more to this story than CP has posted:

    A copy of Planned Parenthood's petition for the restraining order obtained by Salon suggests it might not be as simple as these commentators claim. The document says that Johnson was put on a performance improvement plan on Oct. 2 of this year. That same day, she was allegedly seen "removing items from the Health Center." Days later, Johnson was allegedly seen copying "confidential files." Some time later, a physician from another city who occasionally works for Planned Parenthood's Bryan clinic reported that a protester from 40 Days for Life, a campaign that aims for a constant, around-the-clock presence in front of targeted clinics and is also linked to Coalition for Life, said that they "knew that the physician worked for [Planned Parenthood] in Bryan."

    The petition additionally claims that Johnson told a nurse practitioner who works for Planned Parenthood that she had passed along the provider's résumé, home address and phone number to Coalition for Life.

  • Sat Nov 14, 2009 10:17 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    "
    "Also, Adam and Steve didn't exist from the beginning of time. If you believe in evolution then time existed long before man. If you believe the Bible then it was Adam and Eve which were not created on the 1st day so again it was not at the beginning of time."

    Obviously it would have to be recorded time. Did you think someone knows what went on before recorded time? Come on DP, at least use your head occasionally.

  • Sat Nov 14, 2009 10:15 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    "Less time insulting and more time thinking would be helpful from you MC..."

    Right back at you, Daniel

  • Sat Nov 14, 2009 9:14 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    "Now I understand Micky, now I know why you are on all the homo threads. . . .?" But not for the same reasons you are. I'm not a closeted lesbian.

  • Sat Nov 14, 2009 5:24 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    "Also, Adam and Steve didn't exist from the beginning of time. If you believe in evolution then time existed long before man. If you believe the Bible then it was Adam and Eve which were not created on the 1st day so again it was not at the beginning of time."

    Amen

    Less time insulting and more time thinking would be helpful from you MC...

    and amen.

  • Sat Nov 14, 2009 5:22 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    " But not for the same reasons you are. I'm not a closeted lesbian like you."

    Yuck. . . .

  • Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:10 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "Adam and Steve have existed since the beginning of time which shows how educated your AREN'T. Why not get that high school diploma, Jarhead, before posting again? You just look more foolish than usual."

    First, there is a difference between a jar and a jarhead. My son is in the military. Get your insults straight....

    Also, Adam and Steve didn't exist from the beginning of time. If you believe in evolution then time existed long before man. If you believe the Bible then it was Adam and Eve which were not created on the 1st day so again it was not at the beginning of time.

    Less time insulting and more time thinking would be helpful from you MC...

  • Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:04 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    "LOL....... If it were Adam and Steve instead of Adam and Eve human kind would not exist.... which demonstrates from the outset that if Darwinianism is a true corollary for the promulgation of the species then isnt it logical that homosoexuality need be corrected?"

    Adam and Steve have existed since the beginning of time which shows how educated your AREN'T. Why not get that high school diploma, Jarhead, before posting again? You just look more foolish than usual.

  • Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:34 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "And if they found a partner of the same sex, we wouldn't even be having this discussion."

    That's the point. God MADE the world. He is the one who makes the rules. We can either follow them (quite frankly I like grace much better than law) or we can do what we want to do and break his rules....

  • Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:14 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "And if they found a partner of the same sex, we wouldn't even be having this discussion"

    LOL....... If it were Adam and Steve instead of Adam and Eve human kind would not exist.... which demonstrates from the outset that if Darwinianism is a true corollary for the promulgation of the species then isnt it logical that homosoexuality need be corrected?

  • Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:08 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "And if they found a partner of the same sex, we wouldn't even be having this discussion."


    Now I understand Micky, now I know why you are on all the homo threads. . . .?

  • Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:43 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    "I agree..... A man shall leave his home and the woman her mother... and the 2 shall become one flesh. I can almost guarantee that waiting to have sex until marriage would eliminate 95% of the unwanted, undesired pregnancies in this country. I dont believei n abstinence. I think everyone who weants to have monkey sex should find themselves a marital partner (1 man and 1 woman) and get jiggy"

    And if they found a partner of the same sex, we wouldn't even be having this discussion.

  • Fri Nov 13, 2009 11:27 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    MICKEY SAID: And you make my point completely. If women were educated to all aspects of how to prevent unwanted pregnancy in the first place and the possible side affects of abortion, we would see a lot less abortions. Once again, education is the answer.



    I agree..... A man shall leave his home and the woman her mother... and the 2 shall become one flesh. I can almost guarantee that waiting to have sex until marriage would eliminate 95% of the unwanted, undesired pregnancies in this country. I dont believei n abstinence. I think everyone who weants to have monkey sex should find themselves a marital partner (1 man and 1 woman) and get jiggy

  • Fri Nov 13, 2009 10:32 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "Yep...my first wife before I met her. It messed her up for decades. She would look around for the missing kid.... There are many, many women who thought abortion was the answer. They mentally, emotionally and even physically regret that it wasn't...."

    And you make my point completely. If women were educated to all aspects of how to prevent unwanted pregnancy in the first place and the possible side affects of abortion, we would see a lot less abortions. Once again, education is the answer.

  • MGT2 »
    Fri Nov 13, 2009 9:38 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    MickeyC,

    I was away for a couple days...

    In response to my statement on paying for abortion: "Taxpayers should not be strapped with paying for the consequences of personal choices."

    ...you say,

    "Good idea so let's not include any disease caused by smoking (personal choice), any disease caused by over eating (personal choice), any sexually transmitted disease (personal choice), any pregnancy (personal choice) or any alcohol related disease (personal choice). That should cut the cost of heath-care down substantially."

    I certainly agree with you. But I am not contradicting myself since I am talking within the context of the article and the nature of the abortion debate. I tend to not generalize when talking about a particular topic.

    So your point is well taken as a general principle.

  • Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:10 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Good point jar1961, we should also pray for her salvation.

  • Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:42 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    YOU'RE MISSING THE GREATER OPPORTUNITY... We in the christian community should be communicating with this woman..... exhorting her for her courage and also encouraging her to now be a voice for the unborn..... No one on capitol hill is going to be able to refute either her experience or her liberal views... Her credentials are impeccable for being a Voice of Hope for the unborn. Pray for her... that God will use her mightily

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:52 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Hi steve! My statement was based on the concept that life begins at conception. That being the base point, anyone who takes that life would be against the life of the fetus and thus anti-life. There were quite a few people put on trial after WW II for what they did to Jews and others being justified by themselves that they were not really humans worthy of life.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 6:50 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "Many women who have abortions think they ARE taking responsibility for their actions."

    Yep...my first wife before I met her. It messed her up for decades. She would look around for the missing kid.... There are many, many women who thought abortion was the answer. They mentally, emotionally and even physically regret that it wasn't....

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:20 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    "Anti-life people believe that a fetus isn't life until it is born."

    Thats an interesting point of view, people who don't believe a fetus isn't life until it is born are anti life (what ever that might mean). Something to ponder.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:03 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    "I agree. Women need to be better educated in taking responsibility for their own actions."

    They can take responsibility for their actions if they are educated enough to know what choices they have. Many women who have abortions think they ARE taking responsibility for their actions.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:50 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    "The real facts are that women will continue to make the choices they make unless they are educated and know different ways of making better decisions."

    I agree. Women need to be better educated in taking responsibility for their own actions.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:40 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    "It's about the woman and her right to choose instead of being about the woman and the choice she already made."

    The real facts are that women will continue to make the choices they make unless they are educated and know different ways of making better decisions.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:38 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    "Anti-life people believe that a fetus isn't life until it is born."

    I would say that is what anti-abortion people use as propaganda.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 2:26 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "What a pathetic statement."


    Actually, that depends on your point of view. We in the pro-life camp believe that life begins at conception. Thus, the fetus from conception has the same value as a child or adult. What is right to do to a fetus should be the same as what is right for a child or an adult. Is it ok to kill a child or adult because you don't want to care for them or have the responsibility?

    Anti-life people believe that a fetus isn't life until it is born. So, why is it called "partial birth abortion" if it isn't a baby? Babies are born...not blobs. There is such a contradiction in logic in the anti-life camp but it all boils down to one thing..."me centered". It's about the woman and her right to choose instead of being about the woman and the choice she already made.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:48 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "any women who freely undertakes to have an abortion is taking responsibility for her choice, she has decided not to take the pregnancy to term, just because you don 't agree with her, it does not mean she is not taking responsibility for her actions."

    Let's see if I can explain it better....

    Our constitution was set up to protect those that would come after us. That is our posterity. This means the constitution was set up to protect my children even before I was born. The problem is Americans have devalued our posterity through abortion. Our founding fathers were quite concerned with those who would be our future. Life is one of the "blessings of liberty".

    The problem comes in when people want to have sex without responsibility for consequence. If you have sex there may be a pregnancy. That is the price of admission. When a woman has sex she HAS made a choice that may have consequences. What abortion does is remove those consequences and thus remove the responsibility for the choice. I believe in choice. I just think that choice should be made while your clothes are still on....

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:23 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    "Maybe if bobyyyyyyyyyyy is ever being attacked by some maniac and anybody see's this happening, they should just walk on by as after all it's none of their buisness."

    What a pathetic statement.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:22 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    I take it RaeJae that your knowledge of the science of biology is not very good if you think fetus is a made up word.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 1:12 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Maybe if bobyyyyyyyyyyy is ever being attacked by some maniac and anybody see's this happening, they should just walk on by as after all it's none of their buisness.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:52 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    "No married women get abortions, only single fornicators who want to cover their mistakes."
    "That is the dumbest comment yet today. Married women DO get abortions for various reasons."

    married women do get abortions, but mostly it's fornicators


    "It is not a Fetus, it is a CHILD!!!!!! YOU MURDERERS."

    True.


    "It's a fetus until it becomes a child you nitwits."

    That's a word the world has made up to justify murder.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:37 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Dp, any women who freely undertakes to have an abortion is taking responsibility for her choice, she has decided not to take the pregnancy to term, just because you don 't agree with her, it does not mean she is not taking responsibility for her actions.

    I don't see anything in that quote from your constitution anything about "forcing" women to carry a fetuses they don't want, unless deep inside that is what you really desire? But to be honest I don't think so.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 12:31 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    "And you were able to freely make the decision that worked for you. Other deserve the same freedom."

    I made a decision that worked for the constitution by insuring the blessings of liberty for our future. I took responsibility for my choices. Abortion is not taking responsibility for your choices. Our constitution says:

    "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

    In order to "secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our POSTERITY" we have to protect our posterity. This is talking about securing things for people who, not only are not born yet, but are not even conceived yet. There is a blessing of liberty for all children from before conception. That blessing started at the acceptance of the constitution.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:30 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Every woman who enters an abortuary should be mandated to watch an abortion just as this lady watched, see the child moving away from the instruments, see it's little body being ripped to pieces ALIVE, watch a video of a late term abortion where the innovent child is either burned to death by saline or partially delivered only to have it's brain sucked out through a hole punched below the base of the skull, all without benefit of sedation, a child that if allowed to be delivered would live without a problem. THIS is what Obama signed back into law as his first action as psuedo president.

    http://israelagainstterror.blogspot.com/2009/11/better-see-it-berore-its-pulled.html

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:08 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    "We, as a country, need to put out what clearly what we will and won't pay for. Truth be known we cannot afford to pay for everything. We really cannot afford to pay what is already on the list. People complain about how much the war in Iraq cost but that is a drop in the bucket compared to the health care plan."

    My guess is that if health care and child care monies stop, then you'll see more and more women making the decision to not have children through whatever means they can. It's a tough issue. Abortions happened all the time before there were laws allowing it so it's nothing new. I have said for years, if you want to stop abortion, making it illegal doesn't work. You need to educate young people so that they are never in the position of having to make that decision in the first place. Education will reduce abortion, not laws.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:05 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    "Actually, children are our future. We are to insure life as listed in our constitution. I'm not some armchair spectator on this issue. I brought my family up on limited income. I worked. I took a hand up ... not a hand out. We need to define what the difference is in our public policy."

    And you were able to freely make the decision that worked for you. Other deserve the same freedom.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:04 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    "Freedom of Choice still exists until your poor decisions affect others."

    You don't control others as much as you might want to.

    "No married women get abortions, only single fornicators who want to cover their mistakes."

    That is the dumbest comment yet today. Married women DO get abortions for various reasons.

    "It is not a Fetus, it is a CHILD!!!!!! YOU MURDERERS."

    It's a fetus until it becomes a child you nitwits.

  • Thu Nov 12, 2009 5:16 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Sorry dp, I can't see were you comment on my quote.

    Can I also add that we have never had health insurance but the NHS covered childhood sickness that required a visits to the docs or hospital treatment so cost wise that has never been a problem for us, true we paid through our taxes but in the grand scheme of things its not that much out of the wage packet for the peace of mind it brings and the good health of the kids. Government did not pay, we the people did (that phrase rings a bell).

    Keep well (what ever your health care plans...)

    S

  • Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:05 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "And if we aren't going to fund health-care for personal decisions, then she's out of luck whether she keeps the fetus or not."

    Actually, children are our future. We are to insure life as listed in our constitution. I'm not some armchair spectator on this issue. I brought my family up on limited income. I worked. I took a hand up ... not a hand out. We need to define what the difference is in our public policy.

  • Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:01 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Steve-Do you mean threaten them with punishment such as jail then?

    MC-The lines become very blurry at some point.


    This is the problem. We are dealing with the cart and horse issue here. We look at what to do after a situation instead of determining ahead of time how a situation will be handled. My first couple kids we didn't have insurance when they were born. We paid on that for years but WE PAID. We didn't expect the government to pay for it. So, I do understand from personal experience about paying for things without insurance.

    We, as a country, need to put out what clearly what we will and won't pay for. Truth be known we cannot afford to pay for everything. We really cannot afford to pay what is already on the list. People complain about how much the war in Iraq cost but that is a drop in the bucket compared to the health care plan.

  • IHS »
    Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:14 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    Freedom of Choice still exists until your poor decisions affect others.

    No married women get abortions, only single fornicators who want to cover their mistakes.

    It is not a Fetus, it is a CHILD!!!!!! YOU MURDERERS.

  • Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:32 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    "In my mind, it's abandonment. If a woman truely has all rights over her body then she should have all control and responsibility for what she does with it. Sex can make babies. If a woman is responsible for herself then she has to take responsibility for the results of her actions (so should the man)."

    And if we aren't going to fund health-care for personal decisions, then she's out of luck whether she keeps the fetus or not.

  • Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:30 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    "You mean MC and I agree on something??? YIKES!!!

    The only exception would be "any pregnancy". Why? Our children are our "posterity" which are protected by the Constitution. Now, should we simply pay for women making babies to get more welfare? I think these women have mental problems which need to be professionally addressed."

    Scary isn't it Daniel. My point is, if we aren't going to support health care for those conditions that are caused by personal decisions, then where do we stop. For instance, I go skiing, break my leg (personal decision), I run around in shorts and a tee shirt in January and catch pneumonia (personal decision), my wife and I have our 6th child (personal decision). The lines become very blurry at some point.

  • Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:01 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Hi dp

    So, how do you force a woman? The same way we force responsibility on everyone else.

    Do you mean threaten them with punishment such as jail then?

    Steve

  • Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:23 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    MickeyC--"Good idea so let's not include any disease caused by smoking (personal choice), any disease caused by over eating (personal choice), any sexually transmitted disease (personal choice), any pregnancy (personal choice) or any alcohol related disease (personal choice). That should cut the cost of heath-care down substantially"

    You mean MC and I agree on something??? YIKES!!!

    The only exception would be "any pregnancy". Why? Our children are our "posterity" which are protected by the Constitution. Now, should we simply pay for women making babies to get more welfare? I think these women have mental problems which need to be professionally addressed.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links