Advanced Search

Evangelicals Rebuke NAE Leaders over Islam Letter

By
Christian Post Reporter
Fri, Jan. 04 2008 05:15 PM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

Some prominent evangelical leaders are criticizing the heads of the National Association of Evangelicals for signing a letter to Muslim leaders containing controversial language.

The critical leaders include Dr. Albert Mohler, Gary Bauer, and Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo who voiced opposition to the apology in the letter for the sins of Christians during the Crusades and for “excesses” of the global war on terror, without mentioning Muslim acts of violence.

Moreover, the leaders contend the letter compromises the importance of Jesus in Christianity in order to appease Muslims.

Mohler noted that the letter “sends the wrong signal” and contains basic theological problems especially in “marginalizing” Jesus Christ, according to Focus on the Family’s Citizenlink. He also rejected the apology for the Crusades.

“I just have to wonder how intellectually honest this is,” he said. “Are these people suggesting that they wish the military conflict with Islam had ended differently – that Islam had conquered Europe?” asked the president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.

In November, over 100 theologians, ministry leaders and prominent pastors signed a response letter issued by the Yale Center for Faith and Culture. The Christian letter was a response to an unprecedented letter signed by 138 representative Muslim leaders that called for peace between Muslims and Christians.

Among the Christian response signers were NAE president the Rev. Leith Anderson and the NAE vice president the Rev. Richard Cizik.

When signing the letter, Anderson had qualified acknowledged in a public statement that there were parts of the letter that he did not support.

He also explained that it was “nearly impossible” for more than a hundred busy theologians and Christian leaders to “keep going back [and forth]” with the “addition and subtraction and rewriting of words and paragraphs.”

In the end, Anderson said, “Sometimes we all sign onto things that are not all that we would like them to be.”

According to Citizenlink, the name of the Muslim letter, “A Common Word between Us and You,” is from a verse in the Koran that condemns “people of the Scripture” (Christians) for polytheism (the belief in the trinity).

Campaign for Working Families, Gary Bauer, responded to the NAE leaders’ support by saying he has been lately concerned with the NAE’s recent involvement in social issues, such as global warming, and that the Muslim letter was another such cause for concern.

“Many of us have been concerned about the NAE getting into all sorts of areas where it has had no previous expertise,” Bauer said. “And now, I’m afraid, I see signs that they’re going down the same road that the National Council of Churches (NCC) is going.”

NCC has been criticized by many Christian conservatives for being too liberal and partnering with socially liberal organizations.

Meanwhile, Islam expert Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo, an Anglican priest and director of the Institute for the Study of Islam and Christianity, called the letter a “betrayal” and a “sellout.”

Sookhdeo called for the Christian leaders to withdraw their names from the response, saying the admittance of guilt betrays the Christian faith and puts fellow Christians in the Muslim world in danger.

However, Anderson said other evangelical leaders more knowledgeable in Islam than him had encouraged him to sign the statement and said it would help Christians who live and minister in Muslim majority countries.

“In fact, some suggested that not signing could be damaging to these Christian brothers and sisters who live among Muslims,” the NAE president recalled.

“So, I agreed to add my name to the letter,” he said. Yet he admitted that, “There simply was not an easy way to process the complexities of this inter-faith communiqué on short notice.”

The NAE leader further noted in his explanation letter that he anticipated misunderstandings and criticisms about his support for the letter and ended by stating that he believes Jesus Christ is his savior and Lord. He also said he wanted Muslims to know about the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
khanson
  • Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:52 pm
  • : 3
  • : 0
  • Flag
The doctrine of the Trinity is the conservative Christian belief inherited from Greek pagan religions that there is one God who has revealed Himself in three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. These three persons make up their belief in god. These three persons are alleged to be of the same substance, equal in power and glory. This is the sacrilegious conservative Christian belief categorically opposed by Almighty The-God in the religion of Islam / Shalom.

The Old Testament clearly states that there is only one God.
Deuteronomy 6:4 states, "Hear Oh Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is one".
Isaiah 44:6 states, "I am the first and I am the last, and there is no God besides me".

Clearly, these biblical verses reveal that there is only one God. Yet, zealots in Christianity have fabricated three separate persons in the New Testament who are allegedly called and share the attributes of The-God. They give the characteristics only God can have that are a shameful blasphemous belief.
khanson
  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:51 pm
  • : 2
  • : 1
  • Flag
'The concept of Trinity is not the teaching of Jesus Christ'. 'If the Trinity is not a Biblical teaching, how did it become a doctrine of Christendom'? Many think that it was formulated at the Council of Nicaea in 325 C.E. That is not totally correct, however. The Council of Nicaea did assert that Christ was of the same substance as God, which laid the groundwork for later Trinitarian theology. But it did not establish the Trinity, for at that council there was no mention of the Holy Spirit as the third person of a triune Godhead.

Why, for thousands of years, did none of God's prophets teach his people about the Trinity? At the latest, would Jesus not use his ability as the Great Teacher to make the Trinity clear to his followers? Would God inspire hundreds of pages of Scripture and yet not use any of this instruction to teach the Trinity if it were the "central doctrine" of faith?

Are Christians to believe that centuries after Christ and after having inspired the writing of the Bible, God would back the formulation of a doctrine that was unknown to his servants for thousands of years, one that is an "inscrutable mystery" "beyond the grasp of human reason," one that admittedly had a pagan background and was "largely a matter of church politics"?
The testimony of history is clear: The Trinity teaching is a deviation from the truth, an apostatizing from it.
khanson
  • Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:50 pm
  • : 1
  • : 1
  • Flag
pilgrim.1

I have not aasumed that Bible is wrong but factually some portions of bible with relation to basic faith have been adulterated with Greek Pagan mythology for which zelaots mainly converted Greeks in 65 A.D. have been responsible. Many parts of Bible which relates to Jesus Gospels are nice literature which would help you to behave humanly.

The doctrine of the Trinity is the conservative Christian belief inherited from Greek pagan religions that there is one God who has revealed Himself in three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. These three persons make up their God. These three persons are alleged to be of the same substance, equal in power and glory. This is the sacrilegious conservative Christian belief categorically opposed by Almighty The-God in the religion of Islam / Shalom.
The Old Testament clearly states that there is only one God.

Deuteronomy 6:4 states, "Hear Oh Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is one".
Isaiah 44:6 states, "I am the first and I am the last, and there is no God besides me".

Clearly, these biblical verses reveal that there is only one God. Yet, zealots in Christianity have fabricated three separate persons in the New Testament who are allegedly called god and give the characteristics only God can have that is a shameful blasphemous belief.
pilgrim.1
  • Sun Feb 10, 2008 3:05 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
@khanson,

Your quote:

'Look at the Prophets and God's men before Jesus,
whom they worshipped. They all worshipped Almighty The-God'

What source or texts are you asking others to look at in order to see 'the Prophets' when you already have assumed that the Bible is based on 'human innovations'? I see a self-contradictory premise in your arguments in so many instances that I just had to make a few remarks.

Now, suppose indeed we all go to the Bible to look at the Prophets, how is it that the same Prophets made remakable statements that you cannot find anywhere in the theology of Islam? For example, the prophets knew God as 'FATHER', and let me cite just a few of them:

(a) Moses knew God as FATHER:

Deuteronomy 32:6
Do ye thus requite the LORD, O foolish people and unwise?
is not he THY FATHER that hath bought thee?
hath He not made thee, and established thee?

(b) Isaiah knew God as FATHER:

Isaisah 63:16
Doubtless thou art our father, though Abraham be ignorant of us,
and Israel acknowledge us not: thou, O LORD, art our FATHER,
our redeemer; thy name is from everlasting.

(c) Jeremiah knew God as FATHER:

Jeremiah 3:4
Wilt thou not from this time cry unto me, My FATHER,
thou art the guide of my youth?

Now, against all the argument of being a strict monotheist, have you considered the confessions in the worship of the Prophets whom you urged others to examine? They new Him as FATHER; and as a 'strict monotheist', do you know God in the same way that those Prophets knew Him? Do you confess Him as such, or you'd rather keep denying the same revelation of the Prophets whom you yourself asked others to look at?

With love in Jesus.
khanson
  • Mon Jan 21, 2008 1:48 pm
  • : 5
  • : 6
  • Flag
jesus4me

With all due respect to you as a human and respect to your personal belief, your beliefs are human innovations. I am as a strict monotheist do not contribute to your faith which stands on human dreams and assumptions. I do not blame you because you have been fed with this kind of knowledge since your childhood. This has become your passion.

My dear, you believe in the bible which is the writing of human inspirers, only a portion of it could be trusted to be correct. By saying so, I do not mean disrespect to anyone but respect to the truth that "The only deity worth worshipping is Almighty The-God".

Be a good Christian by accepting the fact that non of The-God's creation could ever become deity, only Almighty The-God is deity. The man-made deities would be destroyed by The-God because only Almighty The-God is eternal.

Look at the Prophets and God's men before Jesus, whom they worshipped. They all worshipped Almighty The-God. The Creator Lord never fakes His identity with human incarnation. Like Adam, Noah, Abraham and Moses, Jesus was a humble servant of God. He was the unique Messenger prophet and I love him so for his teachings and example.
jesus4me
  • Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:33 pm
  • : 4
  • : 0
  • Flag
Khanson, you said:

"As far as Jesu being son of god - I refute it bluntly - the simple reason is that God is The-Creator Lord. He does not need to become human - He commands and it is done."

Khanson, when you deny Jesus Christ's Deity, you deny the Creator God. Read the Word of God for yourself.

And again, khanson, please don't get angry with the Truth of God's Word.

Hebrews 1 (New King James Version)
New King James Version (NKJV)
Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc.



Hebrews 1
God’s Supreme Revelation
1 God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, 2 has in these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom He has appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the worlds; 3 who being the brightness of His glory and the express image of His person, and upholding all things by the word of His power, when He had by Himself[a] purged our[b] sins, sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high, 4 having become so much better than the angels, as He has by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.
The Son Exalted Above Angels

5 For to which of the angels did He ever say:


“ You are My Son,
Today I have begotten You”?[c]

And again:


“ I will be to Him a Father,
And He shall be to Me a Son”?[d]

6 But when He again brings the firstborn into the world, He says:


“ Let all the angels of God worship Him.”[e]


7 And of the angels He says:


“ Who makes His angels spirits
And His ministers a flame of fire.”[f]


8 But to the Son He says:


“ Your throne, O God, is forever and ever;
A scepter of righteousness is the scepter of Your kingdom.
9 You have loved righteousness and hated lawlessness;
Therefore God, Your God, has anointed You
With the oil of gladness more than Your companions.”[g]



10 And:



“ You, LORD, in the beginning laid the foundation of the earth,
And the heavens are the work of Your hands.
11 They will perish, but You remain;
And they will all grow old like a garment;
12 Like a cloak You will fold them up,
And they will be changed.
But You are the same,
And Your years will not fail.”[h]


13 But to which of the angels has He ever said:



“ Sit at My right hand,
Till I make Your enemies Your footstool”?[i]



14 Are they not all ministering spirits sent forth to minister for those who will inherit salvation?

Footnotes:

Hebrews 1:3 NU-Text omits by Himself.
Hebrews 1:3 NU-Text omits our.
Hebrews 1:5 Psalm 2:7
Hebrews 1:5 2 Samuel 7:14
Hebrews 1:6 Deuteronomy 32:43 (Septuagint, Dead Sea Scrolls); Psalm 97:7
Hebrews 1:7 Psalm 104:4
Hebrews 1:9 Psalm 45:6, 7
Hebrews 1:12 Psalm 102:25–27
Hebrews 1:13 Psalm 110:1
jesus4me
  • Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:31 pm
  • : 3
  • : 0
  • Flag
khanson, as you can see, the Promised Land Israel was promised to the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob; thru them, Israel, God's Promised Land was given to the Israelites (Jewish people). Thru Abraham's, Isaac, Jacob, and David's family line, Jesus Christ, the Messiah, and Savior of the world was to be born, and it so happened just as God has promised. In the Book of the Prophet Isaiah, there is a Messianic Prophesy concerning Immanuel - (God with us) Which is a direct prophesy to Jesus Christ the Messiah. The Book Of Hebrews refers to Jesus Christ as the Son of God. Jesus Christ is God in the flesh who came to dwell with us. Without the shedding of blood, there can be no remission of sins. This is why, He (Jesus Christ is also referred to as the (Lamb of God, or the Lamb that was slain). God our Creator accepts no other standard except absolute perfection. Because the ONLY ABSOLUTELY PERFECT ONE is HE, HE sent HImself in the form of a Man (His Son, Jesus Christ) to dwell with us (Immanuel). You see, it was God's Plan ever since the beginning when sin entered the world thru Adam, in the Garden of Eden to reetore His relationship with His Creation-man (men and women alike). When Adam and Eve ate of the forbidden fruit, they realized they were naked, and hid from God. God, shed the first blood for remission of sins, and clothed Adam and Eve with animal skins to clothe their nakedness. You see, the first animal sacrifice was done in the Garden of Eden after the fall of man into depraved sinful behavior, and mankind has been born into sin ever since the beginning. In order for man to be righteous before God, God instituted a sacrificial system in the Jewish Law as a sign of what was to come - The Ultimate Sacrifice and Shedding of Blood for sins - The Sacrifice of Jesus Christ Messiah Immanuel (God with Us). And just like God promised, He delivered. No one killed Jesus Christ on the Cross. He gave Himself willingly. He knew it had to be done. Because God demands absolute perfection, There was no other Way, except for Jesus Christ to shed His Prescios Blood. The sins of the world were bore on Jesus Christ as He gave up His Life on the Cross, all the sin of man was imputed upon Him. He died, resurrected on the third day after conquering hell and death, and now sits at the Right Hand of the Father God.
khanson
  • Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:01 pm
  • : 1
  • : 3
  • Flag
Prophet

Jesus4me and I had a long conversation and I had no intention of hurting anyone's feeling or anyone converting from one religion to others. My intention with all you guys is to share with you the concept of God. Almighty The-God cannot be more than one - He is Just One God.

As far as Jesu being son of god - I refute it bluntly - the simple reason is that God is The-Creator Lord. He does not need to become human - He commands and it is done.

No one is saved unless believes and worhips One God without attaching any affiliations in His Oneness. I never thought that you or any Christian worships any other god because there is no other god except The-God of Adam. But majority of the people conceive not.
Online4Him
  • Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:31 pm
  • : 2
  • : 0
  • Flag
Jesus4me,

Continue to share the truth of God's Word my friend :)

For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek - Romans 1:16
Prophet
  • Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:24 pm
  • : 1
  • : 0
  • Flag
the-khanson
That's very mature. LOL. I have read the conversation between you and jesus4me. I know for a fact that Jesus4me is saved, so I have to wonder what your last post is all about. Maybe it's some attempt to regain some of your pride and make yourself look good. J4M's post seemed to be based on the Word of God. Yours is just angry retaliation. Im sure that your last message to J4M will be ignored as being immature. I will continue to pray that you will be led into the Truth of who God is and what He is all about.

jesus4me,
Continue to walk in His truth. Place Him above all things, and continue to keep Him as Lord of your life. God bless you.
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here