Advanced Search

Lutherans Plant Churches to Combat Membership Decline

By
Christian Post Reporter
Fri, Jan. 25 2008 05:34 PM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

The Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod recently announced it exceeded its goal to sign up 100 congregations to plant churches over the next decade.

“We have surpassed our expectations, which is an indication that this is the right thing to do at this time in our church body,” said the Rev. Yohannes Mengsteab, LCMS World Mission national director for new mission fields development.

A total of 103 member churches have so far pledged to start up four “daughter” churches each over the next 10 years. The congregations have completed orientation to become “Ablaze! Covenant Congregations.”

Ablaze! is an LCMS World Mission-inspired movement that seeks to coordinate all LCMS bodies to share the Gospel with the 100 million unreached and uncommitted people in the world by 2017, the 500th anniversary of the Reformation.

An Ablaze! Covenant Congregation is a congregation of any size that signs a covenant, or pledge, with its district and LCMS World Mission to start at least one "daughter" church within the next 10 years.

The short-term goal of the effort is to have 10 percent, or 600, of the Synod’s 6,000 congregations view themselves as “mission outposts,” according to Mengsteab. But the long term goal is for every congregation to become a planting congregation.

“Can you just imagine all 6,000 congregations planting one congregation [each] in the next 10 years?” he said. “It would double our size.”

He noted LCMS has seen its membership decline in recent years “because we are not taking the ministry of church planting seriously.”

LCMS reported drops in membership, contribution, number of baptisms, confirmations, and Christian education programs/students in its 2005 congregational statistic reports. Baptized membership fell from 2,463,747 in 2004 to 2,440,864 in 2005, a drop of nearly 23,000 members. Confirmed membership in 2005 was 1,870,659, a decrease of 9,554.

In general, “The number of Christians in the United States has not grown proportionately to population growth,” Mengsteab added, “which indicates that there are a lot of people who need to hear the Gospel.”

As Covenant Congregations, churches will have access to funding, assessments, and training from LCMS World Mission, Lutheran Church Extension Fund, Church Development Partners, the Center for U.S. Missions and the two LCMS seminaries.

"I think congregations are excited about it," Mengsteab said. "In the past, church planting was the responsibility of the districts, but now congregations are seeing this as their responsibility, as they are increasingly realizing that they are in the mission field."

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
Chris333
  • Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:25 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Linda, (continued)

In answering your third question about how much more unity not having denominations will bring I think it is good to bring in another point. First of all, all of the mainline denominations say this sort of thing: "As long as you believe in the main tenents of the Christian faith then you can be a true Christian, regardless of what denomination you are in (even Catholic if their faith is right). And most will say that a person from a different denomination can take part in communion as long as they have been baptized (excepting the Catholic church). So really we already have a good deal of unity in spirit and thought, the problem is the physical barriers. The church would practically speaking, be a lot more effective if it was united. It would provide a stronger front against the forces of Islam and secularism. And finally and most importantly, it is what God calls us to do. We cannot say, "Well I like the way things are" This is against Christianity and the Word of God.

At last, yes you are probably right that there cannot be real unity (though I believe in faith there already is and always will be) but this does not mean that we should just give up, Peter and Paul certainly did not think this was the case. It is okay to go to a Lutheran or other denominational church, but I am pushing to end these barriers which are intrinsically against God.

My final point would be that I am angry, I am angry that the LCMS is building 6000 churches, probably in areas where most people are either already Christians, or at least there are many other Churches there. Imagine if tthis was 6000 churches in India, or in Thailand, or in South America, what a difference it would make. Rather the LCMS is just going to be exchanging members with other mainline denominations. This is a frustrating outcome of having so many denominations, they are mainly just fighting over who gets the biggest share of believers, while we should be fighting to bring the message and joy of Christ to those who do not have it.

Peace be with you.
Chris333
  • Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:25 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Linda,

Thanks for your response, (as well as everyone else who posted since my last). I do agree with you that there is a lot that can be learned from strong believers such as Luther and Calvin and other great thinkers. However, I would never, in all of my life, either base a Church upon their teachings, or else call myself after them. (Of course the Lutheran church itself looks very different from what Luther said, which is a good thing because not all that Luther said was perfect) Still, there are some good things we can glean from their insights into the Bible and the Christian faith, but it is just as faulty (in my humble opinion) to accept their ideas as it would be to accept the Pope's, unless those ideas are consistent with the Bible and the truth of the Bible.

Luther's whole position was based upon a direct relationship with God, and a theology based upon the Scriptures, he was also very concerned with maintaining unity in the Church. I am sure he would be horrified if he saw what the church has become today, splintering into ever more denominations, many just based upon a slight flavor of a previous one.

On that note, I can go to a Baptist, Presbyterian, or Lutheran church and feel perfectly at home as long as they are preaching about the truth in scriptures.

Now to answer your questions:

First, I think that a Church without denominations would be beautiful. Can you imagine if we had only a Church based upon clear understanding of the Bible? Of course this would be a difficult thing, but the Christian life was never said to be easy and we need to strive for such unity. (Again I would bring up the illustration of one's own position, which cannot be divided on important issues, this should be true for Christ's body as well) I think part of this is allowing some leeway within the Church on minor issues, but on major doctrinal issues, which are necessary to the faith we should draw the line (and we already do, but we just stick to our denominations instead of uniting)

This bridges into your next question which is where would people go. Personally I go to an interdenominational church which is based upon a clear interpretation of the Bible. This church works with other denominations which share core beliefs. Anways, denominations can fade away, and the Church still remain. I do not have to get a Baptist seminary degree in order to be a preacher any more than I need a Lutheran one. Rather I need only a deep understanding of the Bible. (Such as a degree in Christian Theology or divinity).
Linda
  • Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:17 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
(Chris333 cont’d from above)
Actually I believe denominations do bring people together. Sure there are people falling away from denominations and moving toward the “feel good” stadium churches. But these churches no longer focus on the essentials that you identified or those that I receive from my church. Can you imagine if we didn’t have any denominations? Where and how would people gather as a Christian family and learn from pastors and other lay people about God’s Word and to pray for His guidance? How much more unity would there really be without denominations?
I don’t believe we will ever have unity in faith. Certainly there has been no unity in followers of Christ since he walked the Earth. I am sure you have read the epistles from Peter, James, Paul who were constantly concerned about the directions the followers of Christ were heading. The only one who will be able to bring unity to the Church is Christ.
Thank you again for sharing your personal situation and your thoughts. I appreciated hearing what you had to say.
Linda
  • Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:17 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Chris333, Thanks so much for your response. I am sorry that I have not responded back. I have just gotten back to a point where I can take time to think on what you said and respond. I asked you the questions that I did from your comments: “The Lutheran church doesn't realize that people are tired of worn out denominations. I for one am markedly against such denominations as Lutheran and Baptist, and so on….” Also, “I am not a Lutheran or a Roman Catholic or a Baptist, I am a Christian. I bear the name of Christ, not Luther or Calvin.”
Interesting though, on your choice of denominations you used as example because I was baptized in the Presbyterian church (mom’s family) but raised in the Lutheran church (Dad’s family). Anyway, I guess the expression “worn our denominations” is what really caught my eye.
You asked if I thought the Lutheran doctrine is perfect. Luther, himself, was certainly not perfect but I do believe how he interprets the scriptures on Who God is – Father, Son and Holy Spirit. I do believe, as you do, that only by Christ’s death on the cross and resurrection are we saved, through God’s Grace. I can say that my beliefs are embodied in the Apostles, Nicene, and Athanasian creeds. I do turn to Luther’s small catechism to understand what these mean to me as a Christian. Lutherans certainly do not worship Luther, but he did provide enlightenment on the God-inspired truth of the Bible to help us in our faith in God. I do enjoy attending church in God’s house and listening to what God has to say to me. (to be cont'd)
REDEEMED TWICE
  • Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:32 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
My heart breaks over the questions posed by chris 33; the example of the Bereans (Acts 17:11) is lost in the muck of modern churches. Seeking out answers from fallible man is a death sentence for the ignorant. The Word is the source of all the information needed (2 Timothy 3:16). “For the LORD gives wisdom, and from his mouth come knowledge and understanding” is serious counsel for those searching the truth.
Chris333, your loving Lord grieves over your consternation! Please listen to the soul-saver, your Savior, “because he taught as one who had authority, and not as their teachers of the law.” (Matthew 7:29) Learn from Him, please!
GreatHeart
  • Fri Feb 01, 2008 3:21 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
For several decades there has been a disconnect in the LC-MS between the preaching of doctrine and practical application of it. Our church is more interested in NFL Chili dumps and paint ball than Jesus, despite all the pious talk on Sunday. Concordia in our town is a cess pool. The standing joke is, "If you want to find the future LCMS pastors, go to Water Street and find the guy dancing naked on the bar." That's quite a testimony, but it's the truth. The Campus radio stations belches forth moral trash constantly and Victoria's Secret would just about describe the wardrobe choices of the females. They recruit on the sides of city busses, so it's little wonder the school looks like it does. Big has become more important than "faithful". Sad. The professors blast students who defend Titus 2 and its teachings on women in the home, the professors who are female, sort of, are largely feminists. Those who still believe the Bible as a practical guide for living are considered "too law oriented". Reformation Day, the guys duly genuflected at Luther's name in chapel and then headed for Hooters. That's the reality of "conservative" Lutheranism. For our family, we've seen all the forms of godliness without power and without reality. I don't think that starting new churches are going to solve the problem. I agree with Vallkyrie and Redeemed Twice.
REDEEMED TWICE
  • Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:32 pm
  • : 0
  • : 1
  • Flag
How the Lord must be weeping! I am a WELS Lutheran by confession, LCMS Lutheran by membership and neither by behavior. And soon to be neither denomination! The stench of the decay gags. "They can't keep the ones they have alive but they're starting new ones?!!" is a quote from another who is retching repulsion from the rigor. When the Word went out after the Great Commission, the Church grew exponentially. Why? Was the cross of the crucified Christ the gimmick of the early church? Are we less pagan than the world in the book of Acts? Are we missing the component of persecution to invigorate the impotent? Are the impediments "stumbling blocks" for the clergy? The Elders? The membership? Where is the call to repentance? Theology preached is not repentance practiced. I am completely baffled that this condition is treated so non-spiritually; where is the use of Scripture for a solution to truly effect change?
Valkyrie1966
  • Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:18 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
THE LCMS is a dying denomination with dying churches. I know because I belong to one. The reason the LCMS is dying is found in the pulpits. 15 minute devotional sermons, constant harping on baptism washing away our sins as infants, (despite the fact that 95% of confirmands disappear after confirmation and live like the devil anyway), pastors who get their sermons out of their filing cabinets instead of on their knees, no spirit of prayer, (no prayer at all save for the elderly prayer chain and the read prayers in worship), no heart for the lost and I could go on and on. I actually witnessed one of our pastors telling a lapsed Catholic who wanted to marry in our church that he was already saved because he had been baptized 30 years earlier, even though he had no recollection, thought he was good enough to get into heaven on his own and was clearly unsaved.) This is what is destroying the LCMS. The era of fiery biblical Lutheran preachers like Walter A. Meier and Oswald Hoffman is over and a group of hirelings from the seminaries have destroyed a once faithful denomination. All the programs and Ablaze campaigns will not save them. Only the fire of the Holy Spirit who will bring about true repentance will save them now. I would add that this is true of all churches.
Chris333
  • Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:54 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
I said something faulty below, I did not mean to say that I am going to keep the Body of Christ together (God does this perfectly well without me) what I meant was that I would work towards unity in the Body of Christ. (Sorry for the misunderstanding!)
Chris333
  • Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:48 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
Linda, (continued)

I tell others the truth in scriptures as best as I can understand it, I will sometimes give them differing opinions about smaller issues such as predestination, but on the major issues that I mentioned above I do not change (changing any of them would compromise my faith). My opinions do not change with changing worldviews, my views are grounded in the Bible, and always will be. The truth does not change.

But let me ask you, whenever your denomination changes opinions about an issue do you accept the old way or the new? Do you agree with everything your denomination says? Does your faith change as the denomination you belong to does? Or does you denomination always stay the same?

I agree that the denominations are not intentionally malicious, but I am sorry I cannot say that they are inherently good. Suppose there were two denominations in the whole world, the Presbyterian and Lutheran. Can they both be right? If God is one, and truth is one, then only one view could be right (or neither possibly). Naturally one or both sides should give up, say we are wrong, and seek the truth. If this is true for just an example of two denominations, then how much more for 1000s. It is only detrimental to the message of God, as well as contradictory to the Bible, to have so many denominations. (This is not to say that the denominations are not doing good things, they are and I agree with most of their main points, which is what really matters, but simply being so divided is against the will of God)

"God does not change or "wear out"... ever..., neither does His Word, neither does His Church. "

I did not say God wears out, I said denominations are on the down turn (this is not my opinion, it is a fact), nor did I ever say His Word does, neither did I say His Church did. I never said those things and you just assumed I did. I am also not anti-Lutherans (so long as they are Christians) rather I am against the Church being divided.
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here