Updated 04:40 pm.EST, Sat November 21, 2009

World|Thu, Jun. 04 2009 04:46 PM EDT

Obama Upholds Religious Freedom in Muslim Speech

By Michelle A. Vu|Christian Post Reporter

President Obama called on the Muslim world to respect people’s right to choose their religion in his Cairo address on Thursday.

  • Obama
    (Photo: AP / Ben Curtis)
    U.S. President Barack Obama speaks at Cairo University in Cairo, Egypt, Thursday, June 4, 2009. President Obama delivered the speech that he's been promising since last year's election campaign - aiming to set a new tone in America's often-strained dealings with the world's 1.5 billion Muslims.

The U.S. president, while being careful in his highly anticipated speech to show respect to Islam, made his case that Islam has a tradition of tolerance that he witnessed first-hand growing up in Indonesia – the world’s most populous Muslim country.

“People in every country should be free to choose and live their faith based upon the persuasion of the mind and the heart and the soul,” Obama said at Cairo University. “The richness of religious diversity must be upheld – whether it is for Maronites in Lebanon or the Copts in Egypt."

Rather than division, faith should actually bring people together, Obama argued.

“Freedom of religion is central to the ability of peoples to live together,” he said in a city considered to be the center of Islamic thought and culture.

To balance his call for greater religious freedom in the Muslim world, Obama said Western countries should also respect how Muslim citizens practice their faith. Personally, he aims to make it easier for Muslim Americans to donate to Islamic charities.

He called on the United States and Muslims around the world to stop defining their relationship by differences, but to forge a “new beginning” based on “mutual interest and mutual respect.”

Carl Moeller, president of Christian persecution watchdog group Open Doors USA, commends Obama for mentioning religious freedom in his speech. However, the religious freedom advocate pointed out that Obama failed to "elaborate" on the persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt that he specifically mentioned, as well as the plight of Christians and other minorities living in Muslim countries.

"In summary, yes, we should go to the Muslim world. Open Doors founder Brother Andrew always says we in the West should reach out in love to Muslim," Moeller wrote in his column for The Christian Post. "But Islamic nations must treat believers – giving them complete freedom of religion – like they want countries in the West to treat Muslims."

"We also need to support, advocate and pray for those who are suffering under sharia law," he added.

According to Dan Gilgoff of U.S. News & World Report, the White House consulted American religious leaders, including a half dozen Muslims, on what to say in the Cairo speech. Muslim leaders encouraged Obama to speak directly about topics that make Muslims angry. They also advised him to invite an explicitly Muslim organization to cosponsor the speech, which the White House did by inviting the Muslim religious school Al Azhar University to cosponsor the event with Cairo University.

The Cairo speech is the highlight event of Obama’s Mideast trip this week that included a meeting with Saudi King Abdullah on Wednesday. The speech seeks to repair the United States’ relationship with the Muslim world, which has harbored resentment at America for its strong support of Israel, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and its anti-terrorism policies.

During Obama’s meeting with King Abdullah, he was given the King Abdul Aziz Order of Merit, a large gold medallion on a thick gold chain that is the kingdom’s highest honor. Abdullah said it is only given to the “very few friends of the king” and called Obama a friend.

This isn't the first time Obama addressed Muslims. In April, he delivered a speech in Turkey where he said the United States is not at war with Islam. But the Cairo speech was a more significant and extensive address to the Muslim world.

On Friday, Obama will visit the Buchenwald Nazi concentration camp in Germany.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:24 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Itâ

  • Sun Jun 07, 2009 12:11 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    halver

    <<Your thinking is not incorrect because it opposes my thinking, but because it opposes the thinking of God.>>

    1. Presuposses existance of a god.

    2. Presuposses one knows what a god is thinking.

    3. Presuposses a god even cares.

    <<If you do not believe in the things of God, then you can only believe in the things that are not of God. >>


    Your second statement may be a bit flawed too. I believe in protecting and helping the needy in our society and donating to charities. From you logic, this means god opposes these things since I'm not really a believer.

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 3:31 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Johnzon
    You have commented...
    "Please tell me, Whats wrong with my "belief"? Is it wrong because its not the same as yours. Perhaps yours is wrong. So far as I can tell, much of your religion is about threats and punishment. Seems antithetical to the notion of a loving God that Christians proclaim."

    Appearently you have an entirely incorrect interpretation of what religion is. You may wish to consider the relationship you had with your parents growing up.

    They set boundaries for you. Eventually you became responsible and honored them by learning your boundaries and passing on what you learned to your own children.

    Do's and Dont's, rights and wrongs. Does not our God do the same?

    Your thinking is not incorrect because it opposes my thinking, but because it opposes the thinking of God.

    If you do not believe in the things of God, then you can only believe in the things that are not of God.

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 12:49 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    danpat

    <<"Separation of Church and State" which is found
    nowhere in the Constitution.>>

    I agree, but both Madison and Jefferson used separation to explain the intent of the first amendment.

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 12:23 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "We agree there, thats why the founders of the US wanted religion kept out of government, to prevent theocracy which leads to tyranny..."

    I agree but this is not what "they (ACLU)" mean by
    "Separation of Church and State" which is found
    nowhere in the Constitution. The founders railed
    against Church and State being ONE (theocracy)
    like England...

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 12:20 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "Rusty boy needs to visit some of our wounded
    soldiers and remember Daniel Pearl and others
    who have been beheaded. In Calif. this week
    a Muslim girl was beaten with pipes for going..."

    So true. Religious freedom to a Muslim is the
    freedom to follow Mohammed (by force). By 2050
    the whole world will be Muslim anyway. Look
    at England, Germany, etc., today...

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:22 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    DP, no one is telling you that you cant have your religion at home and church, but not in government. I dont understand why you cant understand that. The principal author of the US Constituiton, James Madison, stated many times what the First Amendment means with respect to religion and government:

    Letter to Robert Walsh, Mar. 2, 1819,

    "The civil Government, though bereft of everything like an associated hierarchy, possesses the requisite stability, and performs its functions with complete success, whilst the number, the industry, and the morality of the priesthood, and the devotion of the people, have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the church from the State" .

    Detached Memoranda, circa 1820,

    Strongly guarded as is the separation between religion and & Gov't in the Constitution of the United States the danger of encroachment by Ecclesiastical Bodies, may be illustrated by precedents already furnished in their short history.

    Letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822,

    Every new and successful example, therefore, of a perfect separation between the ecclesiastical and civil matters, is of importance; and I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in showing that religion and Government will both exist in greater purity the less they are mixed together.

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:50 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    "We agree there, thats why the founders of the US wanted religion kept out of government, to prevent theocracy which leads to tyranny"

    No they didn't want to keep religion out of government. They wanted elected representation of the population. If the population elected and athiest then that is the beliefs they wanted representing them. If the people elected a Christian then that is the beliefs they wanted representing them. We elect people who we believe will represent what we want.

    It is tyranny to restrict a persons religious beleifs in the public venue. This is what was going on in England and one of the things they didn't want here. They had tyranny...we have tyranny...it's just the athiests that think they control what society should think.

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:27 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    halver

    <<You should be very greatful that you live in a society that does not want to cut your head off for believing in nothing.>>

    We agree there, thats why the founders of the US wanted religion kept out of government, to prevent theocracy which leads to tyranny

    <<Someday, however, you will need to defend your belief.>>

    Please tell me, Whats wrong with my "belief"? Is it wrong because its not the same as yours. Perhaps yours is wrong. So far as I can tell, much of your religion is about threats and punishment. Seems antithetical to the notion of a loving God that Christians proclaim.

    To me, its really quite sad you follow a religion filled with threats of punishment for having the "wrong thinking"

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 9:43 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Johnzon
    You commented...
    "For me, the best religion is no religion. I live for what I can see right in front of me, not what might be in the bushes in the middle of the night........"

    You should be very greatful that you live in a society that does not want to cut your head off for believing in nothing.

    Someday, however, you will need to defend your belief.

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:31 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    darshan

    <<For all those who are Biblical-Torah observant, such a policy also is un-Biblical and against the teachings of Torah.>>

    You just stated it, much of the problems that exists in the ME are due to religion.

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 1:29 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    halver


    <<We are called upon to be witnesses to our own faith before others. Our mission is to convert those souls who are lost, just the same as the Muslims who desire to convert Christians to Islam.>>

    Everyone believes their religion to be the one and only , you believe yours to be the only way to go, Muslims and Hindu's and Mormons and Jews and Scientologists and Catholics and Baptists and....etc, etc.

    For me, the best religion is no religion. I live for what I can see right in front of me, not what might be in the bushes in the middle of the night........

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:24 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    PS should read: "on March 7, 1942...had been met with the ORDERED execution of all pregnant women." Apologies.

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 7:17 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Historical footnote: on July 24, 1942, the Nazis issued the following order to the Kovno Ghetto - "Pregnancies and births in the ghetto are prohibited; pregnancies have to be terminated; pregnant women will be shot." On March 7, 1942, the latter "capital offence" was met with the execution of all pregnant women. While the Holocaust is not, as Pr.OB implied, the raison d'etre of the "homeland" of post-Shoa Israel, its unspeakalbe horrors must never be forgotten: thus any demands for no
    "natural growth" within its G-D ordained, sacred bounds fall within just such a classification!

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:56 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Rusty: the problem with Pr.OHB's policy on Israel is that it is not about Israel: it is about accommodating, no, appeasing, Iran, Syria and its terrorist proxies who sit on all three sides of Israel all of whom have stated it is their express purpose utterly to destroy Israel. There can be no more Land for 'Peace' with avowed enemies. For all those who are Biblical-Torah observant, such a policy also is un-Biblical and against the teachings of Torah.
    Eretz Israel, all of it, is HaShem's Land Promised eternally to Israel.

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:37 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    rusty.boy
    you have commented...
    "The story of the good samaritan comes to mind - Muslims are our neighbours, and we need to treat them as such"

    The issue is not about being neighborly, it is about representation of faith.

    We are called upon to be witnesses to our own faith before others. Our mission is to convert those souls who are lost, just the same as the Muslims who desire to convert Christians to Islam.

    There are undeniable differences between Muslims and Christians in this respect. This cannot be compromised since it would void the purpose of Christ on the cross.

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 12:19 am Agree: 5   Disagree: 1

    rolln4him,

    And what exactly is wrong with an education in Indonesia? Or with Obama's policy on Israel? You missed the main theme of what he was saying - you know, moving forward peacefully, stopping extremist violence, building on shared values. What do you think Jesus would have said up there? Bomb Palestine, only American education is valuable, destroy Islam. I really don't think so, we are all Gods children, peaceful resolutions are what we need - Iraq is clear proof that war is a failed tool. But you have proved time and time again that you believe in a wrathful, angry God (i.e. you believe in a God that mimicks yourself), not a loving caring Father.

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:50 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 5

    During the election we couldn't use Obama's middle name Hussain lest we be called a racist. Now our man uses it regularly while over in the Muslim world. Chameleon! Depends where he's at is how he'll act. Coward. He brags about his Muslim education while in Indonesia now, but when he was running for the presidency? LOL! What a joke of a president. He doesn't even know that we're allies with Israel.... He's an embarrassment to the office. The big "O" needs to be impeached - now - as a traitor!

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:37 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    By referring to the Koran story of Isra (Muhammed's Flight from Mecca to Jerusalem )as the basis for religious mutuality in Eretz Israel, and even more notably within Yerushalayim, Eretz Israel's undivided, eternal capital, amounts to an "occupation" of the Land that HaShem Promises in Torah for Israel.This hand in hand with the demand to freeze all "settlements" and natural growth!

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 6:45 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 1

    I wasnt able to watch the President's speech, but did read the entire script. I totally agree that the US and the Muslim world need to leave the past in the past and build relationships on mutual respect and common interests. The story of the good samaritan comes to mind - Muslims are our neighbours, and we need to treat them as such.

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Church
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Baker Publishing Group

This full-text Bible is perfect for children who have outgrown Bible storybooks, but who would struggle to read the small type of most Bibles. The large, easy-to-read 12.5 point ty

Featured Advertiser Links