Advanced Search

Militant Atheism Gives Rise to Christian Apologetics

By
Christian Post Reporter
Tue, Nov. 13 2007 06:42 PM ET
[-]Text[+]
E-mail Print RSS More on Topic AddThis Button

Some of the most prominent evangelical leaders and Christian apologists recently addressed thousands of believers amid a trend of atheist outspokenness.

"Let's face it: Atheism is in," Stan Guthrie wrote in Tuesday's column in Christianity Today magazine.

But arising to disprove atheist claims are not just Christian arguments of faith or citations from Scripture, but evidence.

"We have a defensible faith that stands up to scrutiny and investigation," said Lee Strobel, a former atheist and author of the bestselling book The Case for Christ.

Lee was a featured speaker at this year's National Conference on Christian Apologetics, held Nov. 9-10 at Calvary Church in Charlotte, N.C. The annual conference, presented by Southern Evangelical Seminary, came as America has been experiencing a surge in attacks against religion – more specifically, Christianity.

In recent years, books on atheism have hit best-selling lists and the authors have gained prominence across the country.

The louder voice that has emerged among atheists, however, has not gone unchallenged.

"There's a phenomenon going on right now," Strobel said, according to The Charlotte Observer. "In response to this proliferation of attacks on Christianity that we're seeing in best-selling books and on the Internet, there's a new hunger in the church for apologetics – that is, defending the faith."

Churches are now finding a need to equip Christians with rebuttals and answers that go beyond an acceptance of the authority of Scripture. In response, Christian apologists are filling the void, teaching a language anchored in reason and science.

And if the Church wants to keep the younger generation, Christian leaders should start stressing evidence and proof, as one 17-year-old suggested.

"We've grown up in a place and a time where everything can be proven," Emily Koll, a member of Calvary Church, told the local newspaper. "And then, all of a sudden, with God, you have to take a leap of faith. We're not used to that. It's outside our comfort zone."

Nearly 4,000 people convened at Calvary this past weekend to hear speakers like Strobel and Charles Colson talk about apologetics.

But before even diving in to the proof, Colson said it was time Christians define Christianity, which culture, popular media and atheists have apparently done.

"What is Christianity?" Colson posed at the conference.

"Christianity is an explanation of everything," he said.

It's not just about morality, getting saved or being part of some religious group. And it's much more than a relationship with Jesus, he told The Charlotte Observer.

Christianity, essentially, gives an explanation for all of the great questions of life such as ‘What is truth and justice?’ ‘Why do we exist and where did we come from?’ and ‘Where are we headed?’” said Tom Gilson, who attended the conference, about Colson's talk.

"The Bible does not speak directly to every question," Gilson wrote on his blog, ThinkingChristian.net. "Yet Biblical principles apply to all of life, as explanations of what the world and life are about, and as guidance for all that we do. Too many of us compartmentalize Christianity into some 'religious' sphere. But God is King of all."

With the atheist argument becoming more aggressive, one theologian says Christians need to deal with it and stand up to it.

"[I]f people look at science, they will find faith and they will find reason; the two cannot be incompatible and they have one author, namely God," said Midland theologian Norbert Dickman, who was scheduled to present what the Christian response should be to the rise of the atheist voice at an Illinois church on Tuesday.

The recent National Conference on Christian Apologetics was designed to equip individuals to "win the battle" of other worldviews in addition to atheism.

BACK TO TOP Print E-mail More on Topic AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Comments

Most recent comments
miklejonb
  • Wed Jan 02, 2008 11:32 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
The smallest particles, quarks etc., have always existed as has all the rules governing their behavior.
amystevens
  • Fri Nov 23, 2007 1:16 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
I ran across this book recently and read it. A good start for understanding how evolution and faith can go hand-in-hand without punching a hole in either one:

http://www.amazon.com/review/product/1597260983/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt/103-7875564-6999066?%5Fencoding=UTF8&showViewpoints=1
GoldenEagle
  • Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:44 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
I know envy is a sin, but if you have Geisler for a professor, I envy you.I did not know much about him, but I picked up a couple of his books and I have not been disappointed.I sure wish I could have studied under someone like him instead of the liberal Religion/Philosophy professors I studied under.The Schaeffer trilogy is a good recommendation, too.Good job, schumacr.
schumacr
  • Wed Nov 21, 2007 11:19 am
  • : 1
  • : 0
  • Flag
GoldenEagle's right - if you're going to read just one book on the defense of the Christian faith, Geisler's book is it. Of course, I'm a little biased as Dr. Geisler is one of my professors... :-)

Another I'd recommend is Francis Schaffer's Trilogy, which contains his three most important works. Excellent stuff!
GoldenEagle
  • Wed Nov 21, 2007 10:20 am
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
I like the points that schumacr makes.Many of these points are also covered in the book "I Don't Have Enough Faith To Be An Atheist".I hate to harp on it, but you need to read this book.I cannot emphasize enough how good this book is.
Tom
  • Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:59 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
fallenman--Most of us do take a look at your side of the story from time to time, for myself i have not seen anything that would convince me of evolution-----as Darwin preached. I believe in Creation, personally I see it as the most convincing in light of the Bible and from what I have been able to investigate, but it really would not be that hard for me to accept a longer time period. However to say we came from monkeys is something else all together that to me would be an absolute contradiction to what I know is true.
Gods Blessing in your studies and college
In Christ
Tom
Fallenman
  • Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:02 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
It touches me to know that there are those who will seek the truth even when they are sure of their convictions...
schumacr
  • Tue Nov 20, 2007 4:38 pm
  • : 1
  • : 0
  • Flag
<<Ahhh im so glad Shumacr is starting to take other opinions on evolution >>

Christians, myself included, should always be willing to look at evidence and thoughtfully consider it. As I've said, if evolution is true, we should all be evolutionists.

<<so evolution is not an arguement against God, its merely an arguement for how life was created... the Big Bang would try to 'put a hole in God' but the Big Bang isnt proven....>>

OK, understood. I would, however, respectfully say that the big bang appears to have a lot of evidence on its side. The 2nd law of thermodynamics, the expanding universe, the radiation echo discovered in the 30's, the galaxy seeds found by the COBE explorer, and Einstein's theory all point to a beginning of the universe.

<<but thats getting quite a tad bit philosophical ^^. So I wont get into that.>>

Don't be afraid of philosophy - you and I both need it. There are lots of things you can't use the scientific method for. You can't use it to prove math or logic, because it presupposes both. You can't use it for moral/ethical judgments (you can't prove the Nazi's were evil via the inductive method). You can't use it to make aesthetic judgments (beauty, goodness). And you can't use it to prove science itself because the statement "Science is the source of objective truth" is itself a philosophical statement, and not provable via science. What science does is it proposes a paradigm that, for the moment, best explains our observations. Don't forget that someone may come along tomorrow with a better, more accurate paradigm...

Asking who created God is a category mistake - much like asking what does blue taste like. You don't create the unmade. And remember - you've got to have an eternal 'something' - either a Creator or universe to explain life. And the evidence still doesn't (in my mind) point to an eternal universe.
Fallenman
  • Tue Nov 20, 2007 2:56 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
But ya if the Big Bang was proven then one could say God caused the Big Bang, because without God, one would have to ask what caused the big bang? Likewise though one could ask that of God, but thats getting quite a tad bit philosophical ^^. So I wont get into that.
Fallenman
  • Tue Nov 20, 2007 2:54 pm
  • : 0
  • : 0
  • Flag
By the way, Evolution doesnt put a 'hole' in God, it puts a 'hole' in genesis. Humans didnt pop into existance. But one could just modify his beliefs to make it fit more concisely... which it is possible to do... the whole thing with evolution vs creationism is that Atheists thought this was a genius idea, but then Christians said get rid of it, its trying to destroy Christianity, Atheists thought why?! Its such a good theory... so evolution is not an arguement against God, its merely an arguement for how life was created... the Big Bang would try to 'put a hole in God' but the Big Bang isnt proven....
Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging Abusive, Spam, Offensive, Illegal, Racist or Libellous Posts.

Comment on this story

ID Password
Submit Don't have a Christian Post ID?Signing up is easy. Click Here