Updated 11:59 pm.EST, Fri November 20, 2009

Society|Wed, Jun. 03 2009 08:23 AM EDT

Obama Declares June LGBT Month

By Jennifer Riley|Christian Post Reporter

President Obama has declared June “Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Pride Month,” becoming the first U.S. president to include bisexual and transgender in the proclamation’s title.

In a difficult-to-find declaration posted on the White House Web site on June 1, Obama praised LGBT Americans for their continual “great and lasting contributions” that “strengthen the fabric of American society.”

He vowed to support measures to “bring the full spectrum of equal rights to LGBT Americans,” including enhancing hate crimes laws, supporting civil unions, ensuring gay adoption rights, outlawing discrimination in the workplace, and ending the current “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy in the military.

“These issues affect not only the LGBT community, but also our entire Nation,” the presidential proclamation reads. “As long as the promise of equality for all remains unfulfilled, all Americans are affected.

He added, “If we can work together to advance the principles upon which our Nation was founded, every American will benefit.”

Obama follows in the footsteps of former President Bill Clinton who also issued a similar proclamation in 1999 and 2000. But Clinton did not use the term transgender in his version. He did, however, reference bisexuals.

President George W. Bush, in contrast, did not issue any LGBT proclamation during his eight years in office.

Several Christian leaders have criticized the proclamation, including Bob Stith of the Southern Baptist Convention. Stith told Baptist Press that the proclamation encourages “pride in what God clearly says is sin.”

“The bottom line," said Stith, who is SBC’s representative for the Task Force on Ministry to Homosexuals, "is that if God defines something as sin, we do no one any favors by attempting to blur those lines. Nor will we be doing future generations any favors by obliterating barriers God has put up for our protection.”

June is traditionally recognized by the homosexual community as “Gay Pride Month” in commemoration of the Stonewall Inn incident in June 1969. On June 28, 1969, gays and lesbians fought against a police raid that took place at Stonewall Inn in New York City. The incident is widely held to be the first time that the gay community fought against a government entity in American history, and is considered the starting point of the gay rights movement in the United States and around the world.

In the proclamation, President Obama lauded the LGBT rights movement for their determination that has allowed more LGBT Americans to live openly today than ever before. He also said he is “proud” to be the first president to appoint openly LGBT candidates to Senate-confirmed positions in the first 100 days of an Administration.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4
  • Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:57 am Agree: 0   Disagree: 3

    mike85, yeah, when I saw your post deleted I didn't get it either because as you said you just asked prophet a simple question.

  • Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:19 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 6

    Still, DP, if he was being "offensive to another poster" it's justified that his posts were deleted by said poster.

    Not that it makes sense to the rest of us (who have been hardened in our journeys along life's path), but it nonetheless makes sense.

  • Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:11 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    "But if you were being offensive to another poster"

    Mike can be a bit passonate about his positions but I have seen the restraint he has show. It's amazing that one can see that someone was gritting their teeth when they were typing! :D

    One thing that all posters need to understand is that boards like this have no verbal tone or body language to help context what a person is posting. Words are such a small part of actual communication and yet that is all we have. This is why I click the smile button so much.

    Most people who know me know that I have a thick skin.

  • Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:19 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 4

    Mike: If you were simply asking what another poster meant and you were deleted, that was wrong. But if you were being offensive to another poster, I suppose I could understand why your posts were deleted.

  • Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:05 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 1

    Barack Hussein Obama...he has completely brought disgrace and perversion upon the office of the President of this nation. This King of Sodom wants to "promote" and "protect" these sexual deviants???

    So, all of you who wanted "change?" So, you "Christians," who thought this was such an enlightened candidate? What do you think now that he has driven holes in the Holy Scriptures and is poised to sign the Hate Crimes Act and the Freedom of Choice Act??

    God help us!!! I know He will. This country has lost its soul and conviction and backbone to the cultural Marxists embodied by the election of one of its own - Barack Hussein Obama. He is not my President, nor does he speak for me, whoever he is!!!

  • Tue Jun 09, 2009 4:49 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    Weekend, I said I didn't understand what Prophet was referring to, in those exact words, and was deleted...twice.

  • Tue Jun 09, 2009 4:47 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Mike,

    You have rarely posted anything I would consider flaggable. And from what I read of the comments that were flagged, there was no reason for it being flagged. I hope they find out who did it, and restore your posts.

  • Tue Jun 09, 2009 4:12 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 5

    From what I know of this blog, a post doesn't have to be vulgar to be deleted by another user. "Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging abusive, spam, offensive, illegal, racist or libelous posts."

    In my opinion, referring to someone as "a tool" is offensive, though I'm not going to delete that post because it simply shows that person's immaturity.

  • Tue Jun 09, 2009 4:07 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 0

    Anyone who read what I posted knows there wasn't even the slightest offensive thing in there, so someone is flagging to be a tool.

  • Tue Jun 09, 2009 12:54 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Edi, "Is June also the month of those who have sex with animals? If not, Obama is discriminating them." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ True. Isn't that what the "B" in LGBT stands for? Beastiality? LOL. hide

  • Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:52 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    CP moderator, please find out who's flagging Mike....

  • Edi »
    Tue Jun 09, 2009 10:41 am Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Is June also the month of those who have sex with animals? If not, Obama is discriminating them. hide

  • Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:47 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. show I said "Prophet, I did read your post, and I still don't know what you're referencing." hide

  • Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:31 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Mike...repost your comment. I'd atleast like to read it before someone flags it!!!

  • Mon Jun 08, 2009 4:21 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    For pete's sake, who flagged Mike? What was wrong with his comment?

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:20 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Flagged as inappropriate. show I did read your whole post, and I don't know what you're trying to reference. hide

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 8:00 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "Nice try at what Prophet?"

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Read my whole post and you will know.

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:59 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 3

    Hey...didn't the pro-gay agenda people say this wouldn't happen...didn't we say it would:

    "A polygamy advocacy organization says the New Hampshire law that is intended to assure "equal access to marriage" for all instead specifically embeds in state statutes bigotry against polygamists." WND

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:51 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    "It seems clear to me you're desperately trying to converge science and faith in your explanation of why some people are gay"

    Before the judgement seat of God science will be reduced to faith....

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:15 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Nice try at what Prophet?

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:50 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    Nice try, Mike. Wrong, but a valiant effort. Homosexuality, like adultery, fornication, and a number of other sexual perversions, is a sin.

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 1:08 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 0

    DP, if you're going to make an argument for genetics, at least make it a logical one. It seems clear to me you're desperately trying to converge science and faith in your explanation of why some people are gay, and it just didn't work for you.

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 12:07 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 4

    "Hard to fight the genetics you have been given...."

    All of us have messed up genetics in one way or another. It's called the sin nature. This is why sexual deviation is the sin. Anything that deviates from one man and one woman in marriage is sin. Every person seems able to create a deviation that is 'comfortable' for them. Even the Bible says that sin is fun for a season.

    This is why we are saved from our own self and given a new life in Christ. That new life has specifications. It is defined in the Bible. This is why there are no verses that say you can be an adulterer, fornicator, homosexual or any other form of sexually defiant and be in a right relationship with God.

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:17 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    johnzon, but as of yet there is no valid research to show that one's sexual orientation is determined by their genetic make-up and in fact there are studies, to include one by Masters and Johnson, that say just the opposite.

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 4:47 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Jehovahnissi I think I will take you up on your offer to not believe you. :P

  • Sat Jun 06, 2009 2:35 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    "Hard to fight the genetics you have been given...."


    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


    True, but can be accomplished through the power of the Holy Spirit.

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 11:06 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    DP

    <<Wouldn't it be prudent to change the direction you're going?>>

    Hard to fight the genetics you have been given....

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 10:38 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 4

    "never did I nor any of my gay friends make a choice to be gay"

    Let's say for just a second that you're right. God says the ship of your relationship with Him is off course and headed for disaster. Wouldn't it be prudent to change the direction you're going?

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:33 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 1

    Jehovah, never did I nor any of my gay friends make a choice to be gay. Sorry to burst your bubble.

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 7:53 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 0

    "mickeyc, it's real simple, were homosexual relationships recognized or not recognized in ancient societies? "

    In some, no doubt.

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 7:51 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. show "You really need to actually read the bible and you will see that homosexuality is a sin. And do yourself a favor and avoid bibles posted on LGBT, NAMBLA, GLSEN?, or other non Christian websites. Those of you who believe this lie are playing with your eternal souls. Please read the bible." I realize you have a lot of personal problems that need help with, but lying about the Bible won't do it. hide

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 6:36 am Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    Jehovah, was that your attempt to prove I chose to be gay?

    Prophet, the same could be said for your typing.

  • Fri Jun 05, 2009 2:12 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    There's an old joke that we could place Obama's name in....


    How do you know if Obama is lying to you?


    His lips move.

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:12 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Well, we KNOW that Obama is NOT the antichrist. The antichrist will be a politicial genius and an influential speaker. Obama is a bumbling precursor to the antichrist, but an antichrist none-the-less. Hope and change. Welcome to our "Muslim" Nation! Since, according to Obama, we are no longer a Christian nation, we may yet enjoy the opportunities of being ruled by Sharia law. What's next? hide

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:50 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. show Here's an old joke that we could subsitute Obama in for. How do you know when Obama is lying to you? His lips move. hide

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:49 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Delight,

    No worries. That statement came from the same guy who erroneously claimed that Islam helped build our country, and that the U.S. had one of the biggest Muslim population in the world. Both of those comments were lies too.

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 9:21 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    From the article:
    In a difficult-to-find declaration posted on the White House Web site on June 1, Obama praised LGBT Americans for their continual "great and lasting contributions" that "strengthen the fabric of American society."

    What "great and lasting contributions" and what "strengthening of the fabric of America"????

    What a flatterer!

    I take this ridiculous statement with the same grain of salt I do with his other great lies:

    "We don't want to spend taxpayer money."
    "We don't want to be in the car business."

    Don't "read his lips", look at what he does, it much more meaningful.

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:35 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 6

    "The greek words very clearly is talking about homosexuality. Not pedophilia."

    "NOPE."

    This is really getting comical :)

    You really need to actually read the bible and you will see that homosexuality is a sin. And do yourself a favor and avoid bibles posted on LGBT, NAMBLA, GLSEN?, or other non Christian websites. Those of you who believe this lie are playing with your eternal souls. Please read the bible.

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 5:14 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 3

    "paiderasste"

    I was able to contact an old friend of mine who actually writes and teaches greek. The word is an "extra-Biblical" word. This means it is not a word the authors would have used.

    Paul also wrote in 1Cr 5:1 "It is actually reported that there is immorality among you, and immorality of such a kind as does not exist even among the Gentiles, that someone has his father's wife. "

    Please note that we have a term in American slang for this which is abreviated MF. Paul would not have used the term as it would not have been proper.

    He also made a very good point...we don't get our doctrine from grammer. The Bible is very plain in Romans 1 and elsewhere that men having sex with men is sin. No if's and's or but's.

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:43 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    mickeyc, it's real simple, were homosexual relationships recognized or not recognized in ancient societies?

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:24 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    "If Paul wanted to refer to homosexual behavior, he would have used the word "paiderasste." That was the standard Greek term at the time for sexual behavior between males."


    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Paul used the words "men lying with men" as in "homosexuality", whether committed or not. As it doesn't differentiate between either, and both were prevalent at the time, it covers both. Strike two.

    The word "arsenkoites" which means "homosexuality" is used in Corinthians, which means "homosexuality". Strike three.

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:16 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    ""Killing is a sin and one of the commandments "

    That's the law! Shame on you. You've said over and over the law doesn't apply under grace."

    Where did I ever say that? Is lying now your best defense? HAHAHAHAAH

    Strike one, two more lies and you're out.

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:15 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    ""paiderasste"

    I have not found that word in ANY greek dictionary neither Christain nor secualar. If it did in fact exist it would have been a slang word which an educated man like Paul would not have used.

    It is a transliteration of Koine Greek. That is the language of the NT books and one that Paul probably wrote in as it had become the vernacular of his day and he was writing to uneducated people.

    "Your arguement, at best, is like saying the customer didn't ask for soda...they asked for pop."

    No it's like saying someone was talking about a temple prostitute but was really talking about all heterosexuals.

    Strike two.

    Again you, yes. You really should have gone to college or at least a community college if you're so interested in Ancient Language. Fact is, you couldn't care less because you want the Bible to say what YOU believe, not the other way around.

    "Try again."

    I did. Go to a Koine Greek source and figure it out, if you dare.

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:11 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    "mickeyc, so then Nero was not speaking to homosexual relationships, but ancient societies approved of them, so which is it? "

    Please give me some context for your question. What are you asking?

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 4:04 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 2

    mickeyc, so then Nero was not speaking to homosexual relationships, but ancient societies approved of them, so which is it?

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:44 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 2

    Jehovah, PROVE to me that I chose to gay. I can't wait to see how you do so.

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:27 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 3

    "paiderasste"

    I have not found that word in ANY greek dictionary neither Christain nor secualar. If it did in fact exist it would have been a slang word which an educated man like Paul would not have used.

    Your arguement, at best, is like saying the customer didn't ask for soda...they asked for pop.

    Strike two.

    Try again.

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:23 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 3

    "Killing is a sin and one of the commandments "

    That's the law! Shame on you. You've said over and over the law doesn't apply under grace.

    Strike one!

    Now...answer the question.

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:09 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 1

    "The greek words very clearly is talking about homosexuality. Not pedophilia."

    NOPE.

    If Paul wanted to refer to homosexual behavior, he would have used the word "paiderasste." That was the standard Greek term at the time for sexual behavior between males.

    As for "malokoi" Wesley seems to have the best take on it.

    [John] Wesley's Bible Notes defines "Malakoi" as those:

    "Who live in an easy, indolent way; taking up no cross, enduring no hardship. "

    "Malakoi" is translated in both Matthew 11:8 and Luke 7:25 as "soft" (KJV) or as "fine" (NIV) in references to clothing. It could also mean "loose" or "pliable," as in the phrase "loose morals," implying "unethical behavior." In the early Christian church, the words were interpreted by some as referring to persons who are pliable, easily influenced, without courage or stability. Non-Biblical writings of the era used the world to refer to lazy men, men who cannot handle hard work, and cowards.

  • Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:01 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 1

    "And we all know that during that time, homosexual marriages (committed relationships) were being permitted. Even Nero performed homosexual marriages. So, it is indeed talking about committed homosexual relationships."

    If that were what he was talking about, he would have used different words. We all know that he wasn't talking about that, so why pretend?

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • Music
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links