Updated 12:47 pm.EST, Sun November 22, 2009

Education|Mon, Aug. 03 2009 04:25 PM EDT

Study: Religiosity of Humanities Students Most Likely to Wane

By Audrey Barrick|Christian Post Reporter

Results from a recent study on the impact of a college student's major on their religiosity have led researchers to conclude that postmodernism, rather than science, is the greatest antagonist of religiosity.

Researchers at the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor drew the conclusion after finding that majoring in Humanities or Social Sciences has a significant negative effect on religious attendance and self-assessed importance of religion in one's life.

"Because we consider both the Humanities and many of the Social Sciences particularly strongly imbued with Postmodernism, we take this as evidence for a negative effect of Postmodernism on religiosity," they state in their report, which was released last month.

Meanwhile, majoring in the Biological Sciences and the Physical Sciences has a much smaller negative or no effects on religiosity.

"My coauthors Colter Mitchell, Arland Thornton, Linda Young-DeMarco and I speculate that Postmodernism (Relativism) has a much bigger negative effect on religiosity than Science because the key ideas of Postmodernism are newer than the key scientific ideas that challenge religion. Religions have had 150 years to develop resistance or tolerance for the ideas of evolution, for example," said economist Miles Kimball, who co-authored the study.

In the study, postmodernism is defined as a commitment to relativism and to the idea that truth and morality are not absolute but are determined by those who are powerful. It is associated with "epistemological doubt" or the idea that knowledge and certainty are extremely difficult to attain. This conflicts with religious beliefs suggesting the existence of absolute knowledge, truth, and authority rooted in God’s revelation and teachings to human beings.

"Most religions have not gotten as far at developing resistance or tolerance for the ideas of Postmodernism, though one can see it happening, as some religions warn their member about Relativism, while others argue that Postmodernism means that religious belief cannot be disproved," Kimball noted.

The new study, "Empirics on the Origins of Preferences: The Case of College Major and Religiosity," is based on data that has been collected by researchers at the University of Michigan since 1975. Each year about 16,000 students in approximately 133 public and private high schools nationwide are interviewed during their senior year of high school and a randomly-selected sample from each senior class is followed up bi-annually after high school.

Researchers set out to examine how exposure to specific contents of a curriculum affects students' values, on the basis that college majors exhibit important correlations with values and worldviews.

Findings show that students who entered the Humanities were highly religious but they came out of the major less religious than they started.

Those who switched into the Social Sciences were on average less religious and maintained or strengthened their already low religiosity.

Majoring in the Biological Sciences and the Physical Sciences did not affect students' religious attendance but the Physical Sciences negatively affected the level importance of religion in their lives.

Surprisingly, majoring in education was found to increase religiosity both in terms of religious attendance and importance. Researchers also found a rise in religiosity for students in business.

Other findings show that students in the Sciences and Engineering experience large decreases in their trust in God compared to business majors. Those who are more ready to leave things to God are more likely to stay in the No College (never having attending college) and the Other/Undecided categories.

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Agree | Disagree
All comments on this page are subject to our Terms of Use and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post or its staff.
  • Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:26 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:21 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    part 2:
    As for when, I think many people would point to the late 1960s/early '70s as the time of transition to postmodernism. I don't remember for sure (and I don't have time to look it up), but I think Jacques Derrida and several other Pomo writers came to the forefront during the '70s and '80s.

    "when will postmodernism be a thing of the postpast?" Soon, I hope. We see some signs of hope in little things. One example: instead of the "everyone gets a trophy because everyone's a winer" mentality, American Idol says some people sing poorly, a few sing well, but only one wins. Still, it is the members of the culture who vote on what is good and worthy of praise. So we may have to put up with it for a number of years more.

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:02 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Abhodim,
    Philosophy is not my forte, but I'll share what I remember from a couple of grad classes. Our prof insisted postmodernism was not a full-fledged school of philosophy, but an outgrowth of existentialism in ethics and aesthetics; he said it lacked metaphysical and epistemological foudations separate from existentialism. Most of the class disagreed with him. We felt that in existentialism meaning is decided by each individual, while in postmodernism meaning is derived from the group or culture. Both have contributed to the rampant relativism present in the US today.

    (continued)

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:11 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    When I was a much younger man in college (don't ask, won't tell) existentialism was the main movement among the philosophic elite. It has since waned. Now postmodernism is the ism on the field of academia. My question is when did the one wane, and the other take its place?
    Better still, when will postmodernism be a thing of the postpast?
    Highest regards, and yes, happy birthday Mr. President.

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:14 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 0

    Cheisa,
    It may be a round-about way of getting at the meaning of "liberal" as it relates to Catholic universities in the US, but how would you define "humanism"?

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:32 pm Agree: 7   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. show So does anyone have anything more than anecdotal evidence that postmodernism continues to have any substantial presence in American college classrooms as anything but the subject of criticism in first-semester philosophy classes? Because that's all I ever heard about it, and I have TWO humanities majors. hide

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:12 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 1

    Again, I don't know how you define liberal. I suspect it has to do with what your personal beleif is about Scripture alone being of import to faith, since none of the denominations you mentioned have Tradition as the Catholic Church does.

    How does a devoutly orthodox Church teach liberally? Is it the Catholic acceptance of evolution as a possible path for God's creation? I still don't see liberalism in the Church, so help me out here

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:59 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 3

    Chelsea: Although the Roman Catholic church may be traditional, Catholic institutions of higher learning are anything but traditional. We have three Catholic colleges in the city where I live, and they are FAR more liberal than the Presbyterian or Lutheran or Bible colleges in the city. Look at the large Catholic universities, such as Notre Dame, and you'll find yourself not laughing but crying for how far downhill those institutions have fallen down the path to liberalism.

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:40 pm Agree: 4   Disagree: 0

    How on earth can you describe Catholics as liberal? The Catholic Church is one of the most orthodox, conservative organizations of earth. I dont' know whether to laugh or cry at that one.

    In any case, I wasn't indoctrinated at all and don't think that a straightforward, reasoning view of the world is indoctrinating at all. It's just different than a religious view. If you're faith is strong, you can reconcile the two views for what they are, separate and distinct ways of looking at the world, not right or wrong, just different.

    Everything doesn't have to be explained by reason and everything doesn't have to have a religious bent. I don't have to do a mathematical proof to believe in God. And, while there's nothing Godly about capuccino, I don't think God cares that I enjoy it. If you let your education undermine your faith, you're either weak minded or weak in faith.

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 1:23 pm Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    "I think it truly depends on the person."

    Of COURSE it does. No one is saying it doesn't. The study simply says that the religiosity of university students is likely to wane because of the indoctrination of the education they receive.

    As someone already pointed out, universities these days have simply become places of indoctrination and propaganda and hostility toward traditional views. For those who began their studies with views more to the left (i.e. Catholics and atheists), their university experience is not likely to change them . . . unless it makes them more liberal, of course.

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:41 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 3

    I think it truly depends on the person. I was a History major with a Political Science minor and I am as committed to my Catholic faith as much as ever. I don't know, maybe it's easier to remain faithful when your Church is a part of the history you study, instead of one that tries to evade the world. The Catholic Church knows it was founded to act for God in this world as well as dutifully remaining true to God for our salvation. The two are intertwined, not separate and distinct aspects of our lives as Christians.

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:16 pm Agree: 3   Disagree: 2

    It's not bad to see religion decline as personal relationships with Jesus Christ mature.

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 12:12 pm Agree: 0   Disagree: 1

    Philo,
    Note my use of MODERN science. The Renaissance served to reclaim Greek science only to up-date the inaccuracies of Aristotelean theories. While neatly displayed by the Greek's system of encyclopediac study, it was woefully outdated.
    For example, William Harvey's detailed investigation of the circulatory system needed nothing from Galen's previous medical research.
    Do not mistake me, the Greeks were incredibly cultured and advanced. Yet, one recollection of the Grecian philosphical system I hve is of a painting of the key philosophers with Plato and Aristotle in the center, one pointing up (Plato), the other down (Aristotle). Within two generations, two conflicting philosophic traditions drawn from the initial Socratic system.
    Perhaps, the Grecian foundations for philosophy and logic are indispensible to the humanities, in our quest for "critical thinking skills and knowledge." Still, logic holds that Achilles would have burned by the tortoise -- if it weren't for Grecian philosophy.

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:59 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    relativism feeds egoism.

    ...but pride comes before a fall.

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:23 am Agree: 5   Disagree: 4

    Nowhere are ideas that do not adhere to the conventional wisdom shouted down with more regularly than on today's college campuses. Not refuted, shouted down. Ridiculed. The idea that today's educational institutions are places where ideas of all are welcomed is simply false.

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:21 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    Isn't postmodernism a rather silly word. Since present and modern are synonymous, postmodernism, when examined, is a nonsensical word. Aha, a nonsensical word to describe a senseless age. Maybe we are on to something after all.

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 10:19 am Agree: 5   Disagree: 5

    What bizarre ideas are here. Actually, the Bible has led many scientists to accurate scientific conclusions. Since the Bible is truth, accurate, truthful, and completed scientific research does not contradict the Bible.

    It is not the Christians who are trying to deter thoughtful investigation. Rather, it is the secular humanists who have tried to put off limits investigating or debating theories such as evolution. It's the professional political class who wants to thwart thinking and limit speech. And the more we learn, the more we see that the Bible is true, and the one foundation for right living and right thinking is Jesus, the Cornerstone, the one who spoke the world into existence.

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:38 am Agree: 5   Disagree: 2

    Belhaven and philo,

    "It has not been long since Christians were banning books and burning witches."

    As others have pointed out on these forums, the witch hunts were about the amassin of power by some who acted under the guise of religion; the burnings were actually stopped by eight Christian ministers.

    "Science began with the Greeks and their heirs in Alexandria. Both were wiped clean by Christians in their fervor to eliminate all forms of "heresy" (science)."

    And now Christians are blamed for wiping out the Greeks. That would surely be a surprise to every historian who knows his subject. Please, pray tell, how did they accomplish such a feat?

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:32 am Agree: 4   Disagree: 0

    Flagged as inappropriate. show So do the people who made this study actually have any *evidence* that postmodernism is as abundant in American universities today as it was 20 years ago when all this paranoia started? Or are they basing literally their entire conclusion on an unsubstantiated guess? hide

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:41 am Agree: 10   Disagree: 6

    "Modern science, after all, has its foundations in the Renaissance, and was an initial quest to understand God's universe. Sir Isaac Newton is a good example of such science. The atheistic tendencies developed in the mid-1800's."

    Wrong! Science began with the Greeks and their heirs in Alexandria. Both were wiped clean by Christians in their fervor to eliminate all forms of "heresy" (science). It took over a thousand years for the world to rediscover things that were known before Christianity.

    And now you want to take credit for the enlightenment? Dream on!

  • Bujo »
    Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:35 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 1

    Flagged as inappropriate. show I'll agree with this article. I saw a lot of this in myself. However, I have several friends who went through the same department (English) and are now ministers. hide

  • Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:28 am Agree: 2   Disagree: 2

    Belhaven,
    Can't agree with you. There is a connection between religion and a quest for wisdom (Prov. 1: 7), and in one respect "Knowledge puffs up (1 Cor. 8: 1). If knowledge creates an arrogant, narcissic ego-freak, what benefit is that?
    Modern science, after all, has its foundations in the Renaissance, and was an initial quest to understand God's universe. Sir Isaac Newton is a good example of such science. The atheistic tendencies developed in the mid-1800's.
    IMHO, I see postmodernism as the brick wall that could definitely smash the speeding vehicle of progress to smithereens. Fragmented societies help no one.

  • Mon Aug 03, 2009 11:19 pm Agree: 5   Disagree: 8

    Philo,

    Good observation! Education and its results (critical thinking and knowledge) have always been enemies of religion. Most people do not seriously question their religion. If they learn to question authority and think for themselves, they are more likely to throw off the yolk of religion.

    It has not been long since Christians were banning books and burning witches. The current assault on science in the classroom by creationists must be opposed by all who value knowledge and truth.

  • Mon Aug 03, 2009 7:04 pm Agree: 6   Disagree: 2

    Gee, it sounds like ANY major is detrimental to religiosity, it's just a question of different degrees. I wonder what that means?

  • Mon Aug 03, 2009 5:56 pm Agree: 1   Disagree: 2

    This definition of postmodernism is the root of the problem. The definition is the description of ultramodernism (which has been happening for a few decades now and is confused with postmodernism either on purpose [McClaren] or by not being able to see the forest through the trees [Geisler and MacArthur]).

    Modernism is where man became the measure of all things which means there is no overarching right or wrong but just subjective opinions. Although modernists like to make bold claims about truth and facts, unfortunately when it comes down to it, modernists make man the one who measures and all men measure differently.

    Postmodernism will come after this horrible, tortured and stupid transitional period ends and I can't wait to see it!

    Grace and Peace,
    Jim

Please help us to monitor our message boards by flagging comments that are unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable.
Contact Us if you have any questions, comments, or concerns.
Comment on this story
ID Password

Don't have a Christian Post ID? Signing up is easy. Click Here

  • icon1
  • icon2
  • icon3
  • icon4
  • icon5
The Christian Post reserves the right to terminate the account of any User who violates our Terms of Use.
Advertisement
Advertisement
CP Shopping
  • Jewelry
  • Health
  • Gifts
  • DVD
  • Coins

Bracelets | Chains | Crosses | Earrings | Gemstone |

Featured contents & Giveaways
Joolwe :
Cross-pendant necklace
Zondervan

Struggling to succeed in the Nashville music scene, talented singer/songwriter Parker James finds the competition fierce even deadly. A young woman's murder, industry corruption, a

Featured Advertiser Links