Engaging views and analysis from outside contributors on the issues affecting society and faith today.

CP VOICES do not necessarily reflect the views of The Christian Post. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author(s).

Is Christian leadership in crisis?


Earlier this month, an article suggested that the crisis in Christian leadership is largely due to a lack of training. I do not wholeheartedly agree.

While formal training can provide a robust academic foundation, it can never substitute for the personal depth of faith required for effective Christian leadership (1 Tim. 3; Tit. 1). Neither should any training program take it for granted that prospective leaders are personally “rooted and grounded in love” (Eph. 3:17).

Unless our understanding of leadership goes beyond theory, cultural thought may develop a narrative that suggests Evangelical leadership cannot realistically offer anything exceptional. If Christian leadership is to continue with integrity, earning respect, and making fruitful contributions in a community, each leader must prioritize the personal meaning of being a Christian.

Literature on Christian leadership is plentiful. It’s replete with teachings on humility, self-sacrifice, Christ-centeredness, teachability, leading by example, and casting vision. Learning how the Lord Jesus grips a leader personally, to “know Him and the power of His resurrection” (Philip. 3:10), is what requires a fresh comprehension in our teachings.

Get Our Latest News for FREE

Subscribe to get daily/weekly email with the top stories (plus special offers!) from The Christian Post. Be the first to know.

We must acknowledge that Christ’s power in us is not merely a belief in the right praxis, but an actual dynamic that provides the sole foundation for Christian leadership. When Jesus said, “for apart from me you can do nothing” (Jn. 15:5), He was directing us toward real freedom from our natural self-centered propensities. With the authority and prestige that leadership roles offer in a community of faith, it’s not easy to overcome our natural tendency to manage selfishly. The hallmark of Christian leadership is discipling others to become all that God has for them.

Effective leadership grows in personal love for the Truth, with a profound appreciation for the grace of God, and knows deep down what it means that “the joy of the Lord is your strength” (Neh. 8:10). The event of Calvary for me, for my sins, should remain a seminal reality in the making of great Christian leadership.

John Wesley became one of the greatest leaders England ever produced, and it all began one evening at a Bible study that continues to be commemorated. Wesley wrote of that event, “I felt my heart strangely warmed ... and an assurance was given me, that he had taken away my sins, even mine, and saved me from the law of sin and death.”

Immediately afterward, Wesley began developing countless preachers, pastors, founded benevolent societies, and produced copious literature that built upon a personal knowingness of God’s grace. Even the great Apostle Paul’s successes as a church planter, evangelist, theologian, and mentor, remained personally cognizant of Calvary.

Paul said, “But far be it from me to boast except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ” (Gal. 6:14). They also emphasized the Spirit’s fruit of “joy.” As Paul stated authoritatively, “Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, rejoice” (Philip. 4:4).

Every leader will nevertheless continue to experience doubts, struggles, discouragements, failures, and continual temptations. Wesley had them. Paul’s letters reveal them. Christian leaders are called to “fight the good fight of the faith” (1 Tim. 6:12). An effective leader is thus one who perseveres in love for the Truth and grows in the personal fulfillment it reveals. An inward decline in passion for the Truth, and a severe loss of the “abundant life” (Jn. 10:10), can seriously weaken a Christian leader and aggravate temptations towards selfishness.

Recently, I watched a video: Observations About the Ravi Zacharias Scandal One Year Later. I am profoundly sad for what happened to the victims under the abusive leadership of Zacharias. The pain and injustices that were caused by him continue to make me teary-eyed. In the video, J. Warner Wallace comments that the motives of Zacharias to commit such transgressions were his access to “power, money, and sexual desire” (22:25). I do not totally agree with Wallace’s view as it applies to Zacharias. There are many Christian leaders who have access to power, money, and probably face sexual temptations, yet do not betray their God-given responsibilities.

For Zacharias, my analyses are that his personal love of the Truth had waned, and his personal appreciation for Calvary became merely theoretical. Even so, the joy of the Lord was no longer a strength. Ministry became strictly a professional exercise as his personal relationship with the Lord weakened. Even with his access to “power and money,” had he kept up with “fighting a good fight of faith,” he probably would not have engaged in sexual sins. I also surmise that if we were to ask fallen Christian leaders if their devotional lives deteriorated, they would answer in the affirmative.

A major stumbling block is that Evangelicalism inadvertently encourages a cult of personality. We measure success by a leader’s numerical achievements. Growing numbers translate into a larger branding of a leader in Evangelicalism, and somehow a lessening accountability.

We should be establishing a culture of multi-layered leadership: “Where there is no guidance, a people fall, but in an abundance of counselors there is safety” (Prov. 11:14). Everyone must remain accountable and an assumed celebrity “status” cannot rise above direct accountability. The early Church was discouraged from developing cult personalities, as the Apostle Paul admonished it from saying and practicing, “’I follow Paul’ or ‘I follow Apollos’ or ‘I follow Cephas’” (1 Cor. 1:12).

Let’s conclude with a notable takeaway from the pioneers of Christian leadership who led in a context of religious and political intolerance. What distinguished them was their growing inward spiritual transformation. In Acts, “when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were uneducated, common men, they were astonished. And they recognized that they had been with Jesus” (4:13). Today, we have the same Spirit. A fruitful leader must continually be in the school of Jesus and personally learn to build on His grace and power of redemption, within structures of accountability. Otherwise, the right theories alone cannot produce the required Christian leaders for a time like ours.

Marlon De Blasio was born and raised in Toronto. Years ago, he was walking downtown when he received a tract. The caption read, Have You Been Born Again? The Lord Jesus changed his life. He also had a career at a major corporation, and voluntarily moved on to the ministry of the Gospel. His interests are communicating the Christian world-view for our contemporary context, ministry of the Word, Christian leadership, cultural apologetics, and to "comprehend with all the saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth, and to know the love of Christ that surpasses knowledge" (Eph. 3:18). He authored a book titled Discerning Culture. Follow him on Twitter MarlonDeBlasio@Twitter 

Was this article helpful?

Help keep The Christian Post free for everyone.

By making a recurring donation or a one-time donation of any amount, you're helping to keep CP's articles free and accessible for everyone.

We’re sorry to hear that.

Hope you’ll give us another try and check out some other articles. Return to homepage.

Most Popular

More In Opinion