U.S. Supreme Court to Decide on Inmates' Religious Rights Law

The U.S. Supreme Court said Tuesday it will take up a case questioning whether prisons are required to accommodate inmates’ requests for particular religious practices.

A 2000 federal law already protects the religious rights of prisoners but plaintiffs of several cases involving an avowed Satanist, two members of the Viking’s Asatru religion, and a racial separatist, all from the Ohio prison system, say the prison officials impose an undue burden on their religious beliefs in violation of the federal law.

According to the law, states, counties and cities can impose burdens only if they have a compelling reason and if they use the least restrictive means available.

While a federal judge declared the federal law constitutional, an appeals court disagreed. It said the law’s "inevitable effect is to give greater freedom to religious inmates and to induce nonreligious inmates to adopt a religion."

Was this article helpful?

Become a CP Insider.
Help keep The Christian Post free for everyone.

The truth has a cost, and Insiders help carry it.
A dollar from an Insider comes with no strings attached. It keeps our reporters on the story, keeps our journalism open to everyone, and keeps every editorial decision in the newsroom, where it belongs.

Become a CP Insider and choose the amount you want to pay. You can change, pause or cancel anytime. As a thank-you, you’ll get:

  • The Insider Newsletter, a members-only monthly letter from our newsroom

  • Ad-free reading across christianpost.com


From as low as $8.25/month
Prefer to give once?

We’re sorry to hear that.

Hope you’ll give us another try and check out some other articles.
Return to homepage.

Most Popular