4 highlights from Acting Atty. Gen. Todd Blanche's confirmation hearing

Demonstrators rally in support of birthright citizenship outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on April 1, 2026. President Donald Trump attended in person as the U.S. Supreme Court heard a landmark case weighing the constitutionality of his contentious bid to end birthright citizenship, an extraordinary and possibly unprecedented move for the nation's highest office.
Demonstrators rally in support of birthright citizenship outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on April 1, 2026. President Donald Trump attended in person as the U.S. Supreme Court heard a landmark case weighing the constitutionality of his contentious bid to end birthright citizenship, an extraordinary and possibly unprecedented move for the nation's highest office. | Mandel NGAN/AFP via Getty Images
3.  Blanche calls for ‘congressional statutory adjustment’ in response to birthright citizenship ruling 

Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., brought up the U.S. Supreme Court’s Trump v. Barbara decision when questioning Blanche. The 5-4 ruling, issued late last month, determined that Trump’s executive order clarifying that birthright citizenship does not apply to illegal aliens was unconstitutional. 

Blackburn discussed her efforts to combat the phenomenon of “birthright tourism,” which she summarized as “33,000 births a year from people who are circumventing … our laws and coming here simply for the purpose of giving birth.” She identified those seeking to take advantage of the interpretation of the constitutional provision for birthright citizenship as “primarily the Chinese” as well as “Russian oligarchs.” 

After explaining how “My bill would make coming here to give birth inadmissible as a … way to obtain a visa and … immediately deportable as an offense,” Blackburn asked Blanche to “touch on why Congress needs to act and give the administration more tools to enforce this.” 

“The day after the decision came out, the Department of Justice issued a directive to prosecutors to focus on the conduct you’re describing using existing laws and tools that we have, which is mostly around false statements or fraudulent information in the visa application process,” Blanche responded. “We are limited in how we can prosecute folks that are coming here and lying about why they’re coming here, coming just to give birth and also the organizations that are facilitating that.”

Noting that “the Supreme Court opinions relied in part on the statutory part of this,” Blanche maintained that  “any congressional statutory adjustment” would give the DOJ “more tools and would give the president more tools to keep out people who are absolutely not coming for the right reason, only coming to give birth.” 

Ryan Foley is a reporter for The Christian Post. He can be reached at: ryan.foley@christianpost.com

Was this article helpful?

Become a CP Insider.
Help keep The Christian Post free for everyone.

The truth has a cost, and Insiders help carry it.
A dollar from an Insider comes with no strings attached. It keeps our reporters on the story, keeps our journalism open to everyone, and keeps every editorial decision in the newsroom, where it belongs.

Become a CP Insider and choose the amount you want to pay. You can change, pause or cancel anytime. As a thank-you, you’ll get:

  • The Insider Newsletter, a members-only monthly letter from our newsroom

  • Ad-free reading across christianpost.com


From as low as $8.25/month
Prefer to give once?

We’re sorry to hear that.

Hope you’ll give us another try and check out some other articles.
Return to homepage.

Most Popular