Recommended

Current Page: Church & Ministries | | Coronavirus →

Episcopal Church panel rules against bishop who banned gay marriage in diocese: He 'violated canon law' 

Episcopal Church panel rules against bishop who banned gay marriage in diocese: He 'violated canon law' 

The Title IV hearing for Episcopal Diocese of Albany Bishop William Love, held via Zoom conference on Friday, June 12, 2020. | Screengrab: Facebook/TItle IV Hearing Panel

A disciplinary panel of The Episcopal Church has ruled that a bishop who refused to allow the blessing of same-sex marriages in his diocese violated canon law.

Bishop William Love of the Episcopal Diocese of Albany was punished last year with a restriction on his ministerial duties after he refused to allow same-sex marriages in his diocese.

Love had refused to allow for the enforcement of Resolution B012, a measure passed in 2018 requiring that all Episcopal dioceses allow for the blessing of same-sex unions.

A Title IV Hearing Panel, which focuses on issues of ecclesiastical discipline when a clergy is accused of misconduct, released a unanimous opinion last Friday finding Love guilty.

“Love’s actions in issuing a Pastoral Direction to his clergy that they refrain from performing same-sex marriages violated the Discipline and Worship of the Church as Bishop Love promised in his ordinal vows. His actions, therefore, constitute a breach of Canon IV.3.2(a),” ruled the panel.

Free CP Newsletters

Join over 250,000 others to get the top stories curated daily, plus special offers!

Free CP Newsletters

Join over 250,000 others to get the top stories curated daily, plus special offers!

The panel added that Resolution B012 allowed for bishops and clergy who oppose same-sex marriage to be exempted from blessing such unions, as long as a replacement could be found.

“Importantly, an accommodation is offered to diocesan bishops who oppose same sex-marriage to invite another bishop into the diocese to provide pastoral support for same-sex couples who seek to be able to utilize the rites in their local congregation or worshipping community,” continued the panel.

“Depriving same sex couples of access to matrimony materially and substantially impacts their spiritual, emotional and physical well-being as people of God. The expression of love changes dramatically when it is recognized, welcomed and witnessed. The loss of a public ceremony impacts the couple, the family and friends and the community.”

In a letter sent to his diocese on Monday, Love said he was “very disappointed and strongly disagree with the Decision of the Hearing Panel.”

“Unfortunately, given the nature of this case, I have no reason to believe that appealing the Hearing Panel’s Decision would result in any different outcome,” wrote Love.

The Rt. Rev. William H. Love, bishop of The Episcopal Diocese of Albany. | (Photo: Facebook/Episcopal Diocese of Albany)

Love went on to note in his letter that an additional hearing will take place “within the month” regarding “the terms of discipline to be carried out.”

“Whatever the final outcome, it will severely impact not only me and the ministry entrusted to me as Bishop of Albany, but it will also seriously impact the life and ministry of the Diocese. I continue to pray that somehow God will use all of this for His purposes,” he continued.

In response to the decision, Jeff Walton of the theologically conservative Institute on Religion and Democracy wrote a blog post that quoted theologian Richard John Neuhaus.

“Where orthodoxy is optional, orthodoxy will sooner or later be proscribed,” read the Neuhaus quote. “Orthodoxy, no matter how politely expressed, suggests that there is a right and a wrong, a true and a false, about things.”

“When orthodoxy is optional, it is admitted under a rule of liberal tolerance that cannot help but be intolerant of talk about right and wrong, true and false. It is therefore a conditional admission, depending upon orthodoxy’s good behavior.”

In July 2018, the Episcopal Church General Convention passed Resolution B012, mandating that all dioceses must bless same-sex unions, even ones where leadership objects.

In addition to the Diocese of Albany, the new resolution impacted the dioceses of Dallas, Texas; North Dakota; Springfield, Illinois; Tennessee; the U.S. Virgin Islands; the Diocese of Florida, and the Diocese of Central Florida.

In November 2018, Love sent out an official letter stating that same-sex weddings were not going to be allowed in his diocese in spite of Resolution B012.

"Jesus is calling the Church to follow His example. He is calling the Church to have the courage to speak His Truth in love about homosexual behavior — even though it isn't politically correct," Love wrote at the time.

"Sexual relations between two men or two women was never part of God's plan and is a distortion of His design in creation and as such is to be avoided."

In January 2019, Episcopal Church Presiding Bishop Michael Curry officially restricted Love’s ministry, preventing him from enforcing his opposition to the resolution.

A Title IV Hearing Panel regarding whether Love was rightfully restricted in his ministry was held in June via online teleconference, centered exclusively on whether his actions violated canon law.

Paul Cooney, who represented The Episcopal Church, explained to the hearing panel in June that Love was obligated to follow the new resolution.

“Canon 118 provides that wherever permitted by secular law and the dioceses of The Episcopal Church, opposite sex and same-sex marriage both may be solemnized by Episcopal clergy,” argued Cooney.

“We contend that the Albany marriage canons’ limitation of access to holy matrimony to couples who are a man and a woman is in conflict with the standard of access in Canon 118.”

Free CP Newsletters

Join over 250,000 others to get the top stories curated daily, plus special offers!

Free CP Newsletters

Join over 250,000 others to get the top stories curated daily, plus special offers!

Follow Michael Gryboski on Twitter or Facebook

Sponsored

Most Popular

More In Church & Ministries