Recommended

5 Supreme Court cases to watch in 2024

Jan. 6 Capitol riot obstruction case

Pro-Trump supporters storm the U.S. Capitol following a rally with President Donald Trump on Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington, D.C. Trump supporters gathered in the nation's capital to protest the ratification of President-elect Joe Biden's Electoral College victory over President Trump in the 2020 election.
Pro-Trump supporters storm the U.S. Capitol following a rally with President Donald Trump on Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington, D.C. Trump supporters gathered in the nation's capital to protest the ratification of President-elect Joe Biden's Electoral College victory over President Trump in the 2020 election. | Getty Images/Samuel Corum

In December, the high court announced it would hear arguments in the case of a former Boston, Massachusetts, police officer charged in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

Defendant Joseph Fischer, who faces a multiple-count indictment for his involvement in the riot, is seeking to dismiss a charge of obstructing an official proceeding, which carries a penalty of up to 20 years in prison.

Get Our Latest News for FREE

Subscribe to get daily/weekly email with the top stories (plus special offers!) from The Christian Post. Be the first to know.

Last April, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia reversed a lower court ruling in 2022 that dismissed the obstruction of an official proceeding charge against Fischer and three other defendants.

"Notably, no fewer than fourteen district judges in this jurisdiction have adopted the broad reading of the statute urged by the government to uphold the prosecution of defendants who allegedly participated in the Capitol riot," wrote Circuit Judge Florence Y. Pan, a Biden appointee, for the panel majority.

"Although the opinions of those district judges are not binding on us, the near unanimity of the rulings is striking, as well as the thorough and persuasive reasoning in the decisions. The district judge in the instant case stands alone in ruling that § 1512(c)(2) cannot reach the conduct of January 6 defendants." 

The Supreme Court's decision in this case might influence the legal proceedings against Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump, who is currently facing an obstruction charge via an indictment from a Washington, D.C. grand jury last year.

Follow Michael Gryboski on Twitter or Facebook

Was this article helpful?

Help keep The Christian Post free for everyone.

By making a recurring donation or a one-time donation of any amount, you're helping to keep CP's articles free and accessible for everyone.

We’re sorry to hear that.

Hope you’ll give us another try and check out some other articles. Return to homepage.

Most Popular

More Articles