Recommended

‘A form of reparations’: 4 reactions to Ketanji Brown Jackson's Supreme Court confirmation

March for Life

Demonstrators lead the way at the 2022 March for Life in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 21, 2022.
Demonstrators lead the way at the 2022 March for Life in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 21, 2022. | The Christian Post/Nicole Alcindor

Jeanne Mancini, president of the March for Life Education and Defense Fund, which oversees the large annual pro-life rally and march in Washington, D.C., said in a statement that she was “disappointed by the Senate’s vote.”

“Judge Jackson’s record of judicial activism fails to align with the role of a Supreme Court Justice, which is to interpret the Constitution without prejudice and to apply the law in an unbiased manner,” Mancini stated. “Pro-life Americans understand the dangers of judicial activism, and the threats it poses to women and their children, all too well.”

In spite of the vote, continued Mancini, “the pro-life movement remains steadfast in working for equal protection for every American — born and unborn.”

Follow Michael Gryboski on Twitter or Facebook

You’ve readarticles in the last 30 days.

Was this article helpful?

Help keep The Christian Post free for everyone.

Our work is made possible by the generosity of supporters like you. Your contributions empower us to continue breaking stories that matter, providing clarity from a biblical worldview, and standing for truth in an era of competing narratives.

By making a recurring donation or a one-time donation of any amount, you’re helping to keep CP’s articles free and accessible for everyone.

We’re sorry to hear that.

Hope you’ll give us another try and check out some other articles. Return to homepage.

Most Popular

More Articles